It’s Not Men vs. Women, it’s Beautiful vs. Ugly

Just a throw away thought.

cute-editorial-face-paint-fashion-girl-hipster-Favim.com-65900So the proprietor of a certain white website where I used to participate and occasionally still read started working out, got a girlfriend, and wants to show his new lady how sensitive he is by making his website more “woman friendly.” So, the women commenters have a chance now to go after the men. The typical white women’s lament goes something like: all white men want is a 21 year old swimsuit model with big boobs because they fell for the jew porn, don’t share in the housework, run off with their secretaries, and aren’t real men and trash white women and talk about how Asian women are better. The typical men’s complaint goes: white women aren’t feminine enough, gain weight, slut it up with bad boys and won’t give “beta” men the time of day, but then find a chump when they hit the wall, marry him, then stop having sex with him, divorce him, take all his money and his kids.

They are both right. The women making those complaints are truthfully describing how men they are attracted to treat them, and the men are accurately describing how women they are attracted to treat them. Even in marriage, the women complaining that their husbands are “abusive jerks” are right, and the men complaining that their wives break their wedding vows are also right.

sexuallydominantwoman01So some MGTOW man-o-sphere guy who said he’d never get married just married one of the commenters on his blog, a single mother, and his man-o-sphere fans are outraged at his “treason.” It’s almost the male equivalent of the females that, well, slut it up in their 20s, finally find a “beta” to marry when they are older, then immediately go around complaining about the “bad boys” that won’t “man up” and get married and the “PUAs” that have sex with women they meet at bars.

One feminist got it right when she quipped, “who do man-o-sphere bloggers wind up marrying? The sluts they complain about!”

These men and these women are actually made for each other, if they would stop chasing around “bad boys” and “heartbreakers” and, you know, marry each other – at the appropriate age. But there’s simply no woman that has options when she’s 22 that is going to settle down with a “beta” 22 year old, and there’s simply no way a man who has options when he’s 35 is going to settle down with a “expiring” 35 year old. Men will still chase around beauty and youth (youth, read, “low n count”) and women will still chase around beauty and experience (experience, read, “high n count ok, it’s preselection.”) Is it that ugly people are to blame for not being attracted to each other, but instead being attracted to beautiful people?

Oh, sorry, I have no solutions, just pointing out the obvious.

11 thoughts on “It’s Not Men vs. Women, it’s Beautiful vs. Ugly

  1. “So some MGTOW man-o-sphere guy who said he’d never get married just married one of the commenters on his blog, a single mother, and his man-o-sphere fans are outraged at his “treason.”

    So we have proof that MGTOW’s are pussy-whipped Manginas. Awwww the sound of obvious!

    Like

      1. He is a Mangina, due to his failure to stick to the standpoint of being an MGTOW. It would not have been so pathetic, if he had married a nice virgin girl or something. But he married a ‘used’ woman, a single mom of all women!

        If a woman, only meets White Knights, Manginas and betas (irrelevant if the guy is an MRA/MGTOW) – then she is called a smart woman if she avoids them. A woman who is not attracted to men would be a lesbian. And all other women who for some reason want to be alone or avoid relationships, I would not necessarily call them ‘strong’ or what not. A woman might earn a billion dollars, have a career, own a gun and do kickboxing but she may still can lack individual autonomy or self-esteem. Like most women who support socialism. It would not make her strong. It comes down to attitude. If she has a man or not is not really relevant.

        Like

      2. Btw, could you provide me a link to the drama where you found this nonsense? I have to show this to my husband.

        Like

    1. GG, don’t remember where, probably Heartiste or reddit TheRedPill, those are the only “man-o-sphere” blogs I read other than some religious ones. I had never heard of the guy before this “scandal” but I would agree, if he was some big anti-marriage guy and then married a single mom, he’s a “pussy whipped mangina” according to his own standards.

      Like

  2. For some strange reason, during my younger days, I always ended up pulling exceptionally handsome men. One guy was so hot-looking, they nicknamed him, “The Dude.” My acquaintances found this remarkable, because I was never drop-dead gorgeous even dressed to the nines. Nor did I dress provocatively. I dress for comfort.

    But it was not like any of these guys took one look at me and declared, “I have to have you.” It always started platonically. I found this a puzzler as much as any hotter women in my circle until I saw this Blue Collar comic making a joke about men and strip clubs saying that seeing all those boobs made a man want to see MORE boobs! Men, even really handsome men, because they are men, want to sample ALL the goodies, even the ones that don’t have the shiniest wrapping.

    I blame the television for setting expectations to the point that real people – men and women don’t know how to deal with each other. Some television shows are geared to men and others to women. But the scenario is that in various shows, you see depictions of rather ordinary looking men with women who are stunning enough to be models or actresses, because well, they are. In other shows, you have women who are on the pretty side of average with men who are stunning enough to be models or actors, because well, they are!

    People don’t see what goes into these stunners. First of all they may be blessed by great genetics, but then they have personal trainers and stylists and make-up technicians and wardrobes containing great foundation garments. So, any and all flaws are not visible to the human eye.

    Contrast today’s airbrushed women to the women in classical art. Can there be any doubt in your mind that a Roissy at Chateau Heartiste would be deriding these women as beached whales and admonishing them to put the fork down and hit the gym?

    Yes, we still have magnificent sculpture from antiquity depicting incredibly beautiful perfect people, but the average Greek and Roman walking around back then didn’t expect to have a living, breathing version of same unless s/he was supremely wealthy. They made do with, had to live with and even (perish the thought) learned to love each other.

    White men and women would look and feel a lot better if they got rid of their TVs. What does one do besides watch scripted lives and stuff one’s face? A lot of guys would buff up real nice, if they played team sports even as amateurs than watched it. There is so much more women could do, too.

    Like

    1. Well I will 100% agree everyone should kill their TV immediately.

      I would say that women are far more invested in the minutia of (women’s) looks than men. Men just find a woman that is “hot enough” and then all the non-looks, non-sexual aspects come into play.

      Men are naturally polyganous, women are naturally hypergamous. That’s why a man might cheat with his secretary, but still love his wife. Generally speaking, by the time a woman cheats, she’s already out of love/lust with her husband.

      The tragedy of our modern age is that young motherhood (and fatherhood for that matter) is absolutely discouraged, culturally as well as economically. That destroys the extended family. First, if a woman waits to have kids, she will have less. That means fewer brothers and sisters (and cousins and nieces and nephews) for everyone. It also means grandma and grandpa have less time to spend with the grandkids – and forget anyone ever even seeing a great-grandchild.

      I would think that getting 18-22 year old white women to start having children early would be the best cultural/health/physical change we could make to restore the white race, but I haven’t a clue how to even encourage such a thing.

      I was so sad and disheartened to read a 26 year old woman I know post on her facebook one of those “meme” pictures that said, “getting married in your 20s is like getting off a roller coaster before it’s over.” I mean, that may as well be a parody from the “man-o-sphere” guys about the “cock carousel”, but this young white woman took it to heart. I even proposed to this women that her and I take our years long “sometimes friends with benefits” relationship a little bit more seriously. Her response? “No, no, Hipster! I want what I can’t have.”

      I give up.

      Like

      1. I don’t get it, are you actually a racist? Having kids young and having more of them is the LAST thing a community needs in this day and age. And to generalize white people as having less kids later, is well, false : it’s a class issue, not a race issue. Poor people have more kids, black white Hispanic whatever. But this is a BAD thing, nothing keeps a woman down the rest of her life more than having kids too young : upward mobility can be nearly impossible when your stuck changing diapers with a baby daddy who’ll leave sooner rather than later. Granted, the whole system is fucked anyway, but men and women of all races should aim to transcend the systemic issues instead of going back to the dark ages of “be fruitful and prosper ” so you cab work your ass off for little reward and die at fifty!
        if your post and comment reply was mostly satire/ sarcasm, I do apologize as I take things extremely literally. I found this post cause I googled “ugly hipster boys” . Hmm.

        Like

      2. @Molly

        Having kids young and having more of them is the LAST thing a community needs in this day and age.

        Which community? I’m pretty certain you’re not a part of my community, so…

        nothing keeps a woman down the rest of her life more than having kids too young : upward mobility can be nearly impossible when your stuck changing diapers with a baby daddy who’ll leave sooner rather than later. … the dark ages of “be fruitful and prosper”

        One assumes getting married first would be the ideal. I’m fascinated by women like you, with the anti-natalist attitude. Bearing children – the act of creating human life – “keeps a woman down” – presumably, money is more important. It’s an interesting perspective.

        men and women of all races should aim to transcend the systemic issues

        Don’t reproduce the human species, instead, “trascend the systemic issues” meaning, I assume, some sort of “progressive politics.” I just hope you take a moment to thank the men who created birth control for you.

        I found this post cause I googled “ugly hipster boys” . Hmm.

        Aww, that’s cute, it’s like you’re “negging” me 🙂 Don’t worry, I’m certainly not interested in getting you pregnant.

        Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s