Daily Stormer & The Bitches

http://www.dailystormer.com/what-happened-to-men-women-and-relationships/

OK, let’s try this one more time. It’s actually very, very, very simple. It is one of those things that is so simple it’s sometimes hard to see it clearly, hard to think about it.

So – boys and girls grow up, hit puberty, and start being sexually attracted to each other. At some point, the boy’s penis gets erect and he sticks in in the girl’s vagina. Then, he ejaculates, and his sperm and her egg create a zygote. Then the mommy gestatues the fetus for nine months and out comes a baby in what I’m told is an extremely painful process.

Got it? OK. Now, what’s the matter with “modern relationships?”

In a way, nothing. What’s the problem? Lots of manosphere types complain that women are too slutty these days, but I don’t know, from where I’m standing I have to admit I freaking love slutty girls, at least when they are being slutty with me.

No, I get it. White women are not reproducing. The average white women is having less than replacement children. Women are divorcing their husbands. Women are postponing marriage and childbearing as long as possible, then divorcing as soon as they are unhaaaapy about something or other. Girls are slutty and they are gang-banging sleazy – but quite handsome – hipsters that make them do all sorts of degrading, kinky shit. Meanwhile, Nice Beta Guy can’t get laid to save his life.

Again, this is really, really, really simple. Go back to the first explanation. What has changed?

Well, first thing is that there is lots and lots of fucking going on, but fewer white babies being made. What is the problem? Hmm. Maybe white men aren’t making enough sperm – is that it? Are we running into a sperm shortage?

No, that doesn’t seem to be the case.

Oh, that’s right, it’s birth control. At a time when women are having their periods – thus beginning puberty and sexual maturation – earlier and earlier, women are postponing childbearing longer and longer. Now, what is she going to do in the meantime?

I’ll tell you, she is going to be blowing sleazy hipsters in the back seat of her daddy’s car, that’s what she’s going to be doing. Gals – they love sex, can’t get enough.

So little Sally starts bleeding and getting breasts at *12* and by the time she is 16, she is hot stuff and every horny high school boy wants to get in her pants. Sally herself is a bit picky, she has no interest in Bill, Arthur, or John – but she would consider Mike – and she would do absolutely anything Corey wanted the second he snapped his fingers.

But she’s only 16 – she can’t have children yet! That would make her a “teenage mother” and we know the worst thing that could happen to any young woman is being a “teenage mother.” I mean, nevermind that teenage motherhood is pretty much the most common kind throughout all of human history, it’s bad because if Sally has a baby at, say 18, think of all the things she is going to miss out on.

She won’t get to go to college and get a degree in Communications or Women’s Studies.

She won’t get a job in the HR department shuffling papers. How will she afford child care?

She won’t get to fuck the college equivalent of Corey – who by now is a studly hockey player with a fancy SUV.

She won’t get to go through her “slutty phase” then pretend it didn’t happen.

No, she will miss out on all that to have a boring life as a mother, changing diapers and doing other totally boring baby stuff. Even worse, just having the baby will make her body less sexy, and no one will fuck her except for her boring husband Mike – Corey at this point wouldn’t give her the time of day, as he is busy “spinning plates” – dating mutiple girls, getting blowjobs whenever he wants, and breaking hearts left and right.

Now, bring up any of these obvious things, especially to White Nationalists, and the very first thing that is going to happen is you are going to start reading “White Nationalist” women – old harpy bitches – screetching and whining. MISOGYNY! WHY DO YOU HATE WOMEN! I’M A GODDESS WORSHIP ME! THIS IS WHY WE ARE LOSING BECAUSE YOU MEN MADE ME FEEL BAD!

I think there must be a lot of WN men who have not developed themselves very much as human beings, are not mature in their thinking and are not open to getting to know real women. Perhaps they were rejected by women in the past or their mother was a shrew and so now they hold a grudge against all women. If a man never learned how to connect emotionally, he may conclude that it is women’s fault.

In other words, “you’re all just immature and can’t get laid crybaby!”

It’s pretty much pointless to discuss things with women, because women are emotional creatures and delicate little things that can’t handle the slightest bit of criticism. I am telling you this – your WORST and most disruptive people in the “White Nationalist” movement are old, washed up party girls who didn’t even marry until she was 40 and had precisely ZERO white kids.

Yeah, sure, let’s listen to these old battle axes.

Sure, it would be nice if we had wise women elders – mature matriarchs, loved by her children and grand-children, dispensing advice and mentoring the younger women.

But those kind of women do NOT troll White Nationalists websites, now do they? Nope, only a very specific kind of woman drinks lots of wine and trolls WN websites … now go see if you can spot one in that Daily Stormer thread.

Take Mike, a handsome but kind of beta young white guy – give him a real job, some money, let him mature for a few years, until he’s, say, 24, then give him a hot teenage girl to fuck and impregnate. 16-21. Don’t let young white women put off marriage and family too long.

Don’t bother with Corey – Corey is going to be fucking a lot of women whether you like it or not. Don’t worry about Joe – I didn’t mention him, but he’s useless and he can stick to porn as no woman will have him anyway.

Worry about Mike – get him set up, let him fuck the hell out of Sally, then, as a community, help the young family keep their head above water.

What ever you do, don’t listen to the fucking bitches of the “White Nationalist movement” who prove every single day how badly feminism has fucked up older women.

The old women are a loss – write them off. Save the young women before it’s too late.

What makes women different than men is their sexual attraction to *power*. This is what most men just can’t seem to get through their head. They see something like 50 Shades of Grey and think, “what, women like to be spanked?”

Yeah, they do, but that’s not the point. Getting spanked by a beta like Billy is giggle-inducing. Getting spanked by Joe is rape and assault.

Getting spanked by Corey is a diddle-worthy fantasy. In fact, being a sex slave being degraded daily by Corey is a multi-orgasm worthy fantasy. Why? Looks, certainly, and the cocky arrogance that comes from being a good looking “alpha.”

But it’s Corey’s *power* – his family’s money, his hot car, his power *over other women* – his power *over other men* like when his soccer team beats their rivals.

His physical power that she is fully aware of – he’s big and strong and could kill her with his bare hands. When he’s fucking her, she is deeply aware of his physical power. The fact that he can tackle men on the football field – while ever-so-gently caressing her afterwards – that focused and controlled power, women love it.

Of course, we have all but gelded middle and working class white men. We give women the power to drag her husband through the divorce courts and she *knows* she has that power over her man. She comes to resent her husband becuase she has that power over him.

Sally can push and push, be really bitchy, and if Mike dares to turn her over his knee and deliver a message straight to her ass – well, if she likes it, cool, but if not it’s “domestic abuse.” Sally knows this – she has the power, not Mike, thus she resents him.

Mike and Sally decide to be a “power couple” and then Sally gets promoted and makes more money than Mike. How do you think that is going to work out? Sally is going to despise Mike for that. She has the power, he doesn’t. He may as well check his balls at the front door.

Power. When middle and working class white men had power over their wives – and their families in general – everything was pretty good, things worked out. It wasn’t perfect, of course, but it was a workable system. Now, as a society, we have taken that power away from the average working and middle class white man, and are suprised that white women have become amateur prostitutes, have reduced their fertility, and break up their families at the drop of a hat.

There’s nothing wrong with women; women are fine just the way they are. It’s our society – we don’t promote teenage motherhood – we promote teenage promiscuity – then we act surprised that men can’t turn a whore into a housewife. We have an entire women’s movement that sees killing unborn babies as the most important right a woman has. We have white women wearing t-shirts bragging about having an abortion – then we wonder why white people have a declining population.

In many ways, men have disappointed women by taking them too seriously. She was being a bitch hoping you’d get mad and bend her over your knee and spank her. Instead, you actually took her bitching about the dirt on the carpet seriously.

Her disappointment was apparent.

“Girls don’t like boys, girls like cars and money.”

19 thoughts on “Daily Stormer & The Bitches

  1. This is a good article, HR. You understand this issue better than most WNs and PUAs.

    Ignore what the lower level WN write and set your own mark. Obviously the solution that will work won’t be popular initially.

    Like

    1. This is more about family formation. “Game” is easy enough. Most guys and most gals wind up with someone, sex is easy.

      What has changed is the economic and social basis for marriage and family. In fact, “game” exists only because now men have to put in all sorts of energy to get women, while in the past, the community would make sure young people paired up early and stayed together.

      “Game” is sort of an individual guy who may be awkward around women, but it’s not going to fix the economic and power dynamics of marriage in the modern West.

      Like

  2. WASPs’ loss of faith and abandonment of their churches is a major factor. I’m not a Christian, but the loss of social capital that this shift represents is devastating and plays directly into what you say about how “in the past, the community would make sure young people paired up early and stayed together.” A problem that whites have now is that we don’t really know what, if anything, is going to replace the church in community life. The competitors range from asatru to satanism and plain old time religion, but I happen to think the genie of atheism is out of the bottle forever.

    Like

    1. I was just listening to an interview with E. Michael Jones about his famous work, Libido Dominati, about political control through sexual liberation. I think there’s a lot of truth to what he says, but I don’t agree with a lot of it.

      He mentioned that while the fight over obscenity in cinema was a Catholic vs. Jewish thing, contraception was a Catholic vs. Protestant thing.

      Scientifically, the notion that “a man has as many masters as he has vices” – Jones’ key thesis – can be scientifically explained via the notion of “supernormal stimulus.”

      Most of the vices – pornography, drugs, alcohol, gambling, obesity, etc., can all be explained as the results of supernormal stimuli.

      There’s a great animation about the concept on youtube somewhere but I can’t find it.

      Like

      1. Libido Dominandi is on my things-to-read list, along with The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and his other books. Jones came out with a big, thick, new one about usury, Barren Metal, last year and I got an advertisement for it in the mail that sounded interesting, but the asking price was something way out of my league like $70.00.

        Like

    2. we don’t really know what, if anything, is going to replace the church in community life.

      We used to talk about this on MWIR all the time.

      The competitors range from asatru to satanism and plain old time religion, but I happen to think the genie of atheism is out of the bottle forever.

      But it’s not an *ideology* that we’re missing. When people on MWIR started saying, “we need a new pro-white religion to replace Christianity,” I was always saying, no, we don’t need another *religion* or *ideology.*

      What we are missing is the *institution.* It’s not the mythology, it’s the fact that people are members of an institution. It’s the building – it’s the tax break – it’s the fact that the women co-operate and baby-sit each other’s kids. It’s the fact the men socialize after church.

      It’s the organization, not the ideology. That’s what we’re missing.

      The Unitarian-Universalists is not even a religion anymore, and their ideology is just hardcore multi-culturalism mixed with atheism.

      Yet they are one of the richest, most educated, and most successful WASP groups in America today.

      Why? Because even though they gave up their religion – they are all atheists now – they did not give up their *institution*.

      Like

      1. By the way, in my spare moments I’m chipping away at the writing of a book (which I probably won’t be even close to finishing for at least three years) and I’m quoting you in it. Would you object to being described as a “white nationalist sex advice blogger”? I wrote that semi-facetiously, but it seems descriptive enough to introduce your credentials as a warrant for the quote.

        Like

  3. Reblogged this on vikingbitch's Blog and commented:
    Oh Hipster. You had it but then missed the mark. Yeah White Men had power, but no one took if from them – THEY GAVE IT AWAY WILLINGLY. American White Men Post WWII fell into the Jew laden trap that they were The Keepers of The Great White American empire and that they could shit on their women via the Playboy, Poon, and Porn culture. They carried within them a false pride, an ego that being a White American Male could buy them all the pussy in the world. They forgot that they needed their American White Women’s support and tossed us aside. They discounted Working White Women and traded us in for cheaper models.

    So now the White Birthrate is down because young White Women are just modeling what the American White Male Leaders have done and do. Aren’t men supposed to lead by example? Well many have set a piss poor example and fucked things up royally. If men want respect and power, they must be respectful and powerful. Traipsing around strip clubs, spanking to porn endlessly, banging prostitutes all the while claiming to ‘put family first’ is pretty hypocritical.

    Just be male sluts and own it. Fuck who you want fuck, just be honest about it. Sire kids to different women but be honest with the women in your lives about it.

    Rip down the artifice and let the decline happen because that is the only way we will be able to rebuild – when the walls of falsity break down the alchemy can occur!

    I was raised by a European dad. He was / is a man’s man, but not in the American White Male sense of bravado and braggadocio. I did not have to endure hours of college and pro football watching via the Talmudvision – thank God! Looking back at my life and coming to terms with my identity, I was raised not as a White American. My father hated when the White Guys would come by my house with ball caps on in reverse.

    White American men were raised with what I call The King of the Castle Complex except without the castle and the street cred to back it up. Look, I am all about being supportive on my man should I have one, but the thumping on the chest and ‘keeping the bitches in line’ attitude that wafts from WNs really reeks of nigger in many ways. Never in a million years would my Dutch father talk the way many if these WNs talk.

    Coming to American WN has been a shock for me. I frankly could give two shytes if you all ignore me. This forty something ‘hag’ has put myself through school, worked at least two decades, and birthed three kids – two of them naturally, and breadtfed all of them. iI certainly do not need a man to give me advice. Likewise, I don’t want a guy to depend on my advice.

    Do what you want to do.

    I like sex. I’ve fucked younger guys. I’ve fucked much older guys. I loved them. No I am not a ho. Yes, I shared selfies with my boyfriends of my boobs and butt. Hey, better me than some porn Tron.

    American WN is so damn moralistic. I gave up in it awhile ago. I read the blogs and I post. It is stimulating and it is interesting, but it is a far cry from Reality.
    I just see myself as some displaced pagan Aryan Viking. I see myself as someone who is not of this time. So I make my own way, and let the mean remarks and insults roll off my back.

    Like

  4. Mr. Hipster,
    I’m new to your blog. We can simplify it in the easiest way possible.
    Most white women are not attracted to white males anymore. They want the black man,
    and they can openly persue the black man. Many actually see the white man as second
    rate. Look at sites like Interracial Breeders, othellouniverse, and other sites run under
    the title horridtemptatation.tumblr.com. The white woman worships her new black
    master. She is very happy to beed with him and wants his seed and baby.
    The Jews set the table, and the white woman was only to happy to dine.

    Like

    1. Most white women are not attracted to white males anymore. They want the black man,

      This, of course, isn’t just wrong, it’s absolutely idiotic. The number of white women that want black men is *tiny* – it’s a fringe.

      The number of white *men* into interracial cuckolding – the type of men that fantasize about white women with black men, is, however, much higher than one might expect.

      Look at sites like Interracial Breeders, othellouniverse, and other sites run under
      the title horridtemptatation.tumblr.com. The white woman worships her new black
      master. She is very happy to beed with him and wants his seed and baby.

      No, thank you, I have no interest in looking at interracial cuckold porn.

      You should probably find a different blog with which to engage your fetish.

      Like

  5. Happy New Year, Hipster Baby:

    There is truth in some of the shit you’re saying. A lot of women suffer from their own version of Jason Alexander’s George Costanza Syndrome. They are in “Mike’s” league, but they want and subconsciously believe they deserve a “Corey.”

    Traditional society left very few options open for women. Marriage WAS their vocation, so the women had to look at a “Corey” more realistically as Fantasy Material, because a “Corey” was clearly out of their league. This put much more competition for a “Mike,” so that the woman who landed a “Mike” felt pretty damned lucky if she considered the alternatives.

    It didn’t take long for most working women to figure out that the corner office dangled under their noses by Feminism to lure them out of traditional roles would never happen and that they’d have to eke out their careers working in cubicles. Thanks to the way that Anti-White Male bigotry has been institutionalized to make the working prospects of a lot of White men shaky at best, women have to work.

    IMO, a Corey is eventually going to settle down with some woman, but she’ll probably be a lot younger and prettier than a Sally AND she’ll be occupying that corner office; let’s call her a Buffy. Then Corey and Buffy are going to be that Power Couple who can afford the nannies and the plastic surgeons that would give Buffy a breast lift and a tummy tuck after Corey Jr. inevitably works his magic on her pregnant body. Or better, yet, they can afford a doctor who can harvest Buffy’s eggs and plant their embryo in some surrogate.

    Realistically, a good job albeit in a cubicle with no windows, keeps her on parity with and attractive to a Mike. And it gives her better protection from having to settle and grit it out with a Joe. I think the real problem of careerism in women is that it gives a Sally THE ILLUSION OF CHOICE and that choice, of course, would be with a fantasy guy like Corey, just like Mike’s choice would be to have his own Buffy.

    It behooves the Mikes and Sallys to drop George Costanza Syndrome and work with each other. Keep their Coreys and Buffys restricted to fantasy the way they used to.

    Now the big question is how to change attitudes by dispelling any illusions fostered by this Consumerist Matrix we are living in? I don’t know, but I think that this is something that ALL Pro-Whites, married or single, young or old, parents or childfree, have to do.

    Short of some kind of cultural coup where parents have the authority to force the Mikes and Sallys to pair off at an early age in arranged marriages, I don’t know how we could do this, HR.

    Where I have to respectfully disagree with you is that any Pro-Whites are expendable at this point. If you recall, Mindweapons wanted to focus on reports of Mudshark Misery as a cautionary tale against White girls mashing it with Non-White boys. Well, I think childless people who came to WNism too late to reverse the childless course their feet were set on when they were ignorant would be a huge asset to the cause by simply coming forward and admitting how much they regretted their ignorance.

    IMO, if more childless career women step up and let young White women know that they opted for a career over children and then they woke up in their forties and fifties to discover that all they had to show for it was a shaky pension plan would be much more effective than all the feminist-bashing done by WN men.

    The basic message that WNism has to convey to ALL Whites is that YOU CAN’T HAVE IT ALL. You have to invest yourself in one thing or another. Children or Hedonism (which is then limited by how good-looking and rich you are).

    Just my $.002 worth if it’s worth that much.

    Like

    1. Well, I think childless people who came to WNism too late to reverse the childless course their feet were set on when they were ignorant would be a huge asset to the cause by simply coming forward and admitting how much they regretted their ignorance.

      [If] more childless career women step up and let young White women know that they opted for a career over children and then they woke up in their forties and fifties to discover that all they had to show for it was a shaky pension plan would be much more effective than all the feminist-bashing done by WN men.

      Agreed 100%. I just don’t see any “WN” women doing that. Not just the mistake of “childless career women” but the whole gamut: promiscuity, divorce, etc. Lots of “traditionalist Christian” women’s blogs are doing just that – and they actually have an audience of young women.

      The “WN” women – like the ones in that DailyStormer thread – are just the mirror image of those feminist-bashing “betas who can’t get laid.” The losers of the “hookup culture” are young beta men and older women. It’s no surprise it is those two groups pointing fingers and blaming each other.

      Now – “sexist misogynist pig” hat back on – I thought older women would be smarter and wiser than young men? Yet look who they chose to argue with?

      Like

  6. Well, I can only speak for myself. I like “arguing with” you, because you are one of those rare “sexist misogynist pigs” I like. A nice balance of intelligence and what in the old days was called “a certain roguish charm.” If you are anything like your onscreen persona, I think you’d be fun as well as infuriating. That’s a lethal combination. You know that old, saw; better a headache than a bore. You should really start up your own PUA site, because I suspect that, if your students pay attention, they’d all be very successful with the opposite sex.

    And sorry, but I have to object to the whole alpha-beta wolf nonsense that sites like Heartiste spew out. It overlooks the whole dichotomy of men (that I don’t totally “get,” but see in action) where two guys beat the shit out of each other one moment and then the winner buys the loser a beer. We have thousands of years of history where Aryan men beat their swords into ploughshares and back again, so I think “werewolf” is more apt.

    The “young beta man” of today was the callow youth of yesterday. The big difference is that the callow youth had lots of guidance and mentorship from role models who had “been there, done that, got the tee shirt” and all that jazz. The reason why we are seeing older “beta” men is because they didn’t get that, thanks to the hedonism and mammonism that became the culture. Otherwise, they’d have all gone through their own “coming of age” where the boy becomes a man instead of remaining a Peter Pan who has married his Wendy.

    I also disagree with you that those “beta” men can’t get laid. All men have their own unique charm especially if they are involved in their own pursuits; i.e. what fires their own passion. There is something about a guy that is really engaged and enjoying himself that makes him more attractive. I dated a lot of “nerdy” guys and enjoyed being with them.

    I was never “Buffy” material but not butt ugly. I look like my dad who was a handsome man. He translated to the feminine OKAY, but I was never candy shop pretty. A century ago, me au naturel would have been called a “handsome” woman. If I slap the “war paint” on and dress to the nines, I wouldn’t shame any guy who had me on his arm. I guess my “twins” bagged a couple of Coreys and all I can say is there is a lot of truth to the old saying that great looks don’t need great personality and vice versa. I ultimately stumbled on my Mike with some added oomph so I’m not complaining.

    For some reason, I am a lot more optimistic and far less cynical now. I am a lot less ready to write a guy off than I was when I was younger. I really believe that it’s possible for any man reinvent and redeem himself. I saw it happen with some little punk who ended up in a shotgun marriage with a relative of mine. He had to struggle and boy did he resent it. It took him a long time to grow up, but when he did …. wow. He just welcomed his first grandson into the world and is quite the patriarch. Who’d a thunk it? Not me.

    All I know is that all of us, the young people, in particular, are going to have to use this time of terrible transition to redeem and reinvent ourselves. Something is going to happen. This decadent hedonism can’t continue, because it is the death of us. Kievsky was right when he said we have to become a stern people again.

    Like

    1. I’m a traditionalist. That means that our traditions are the ideal, it’s what we hope to live up to. Yet, as people, we’re not perfect so we are not always going to do that.

      It’s like with the gays. There’s no point in starting some crusade against sodomites. But there is no need to change tradition one bit when it comes to marriage. Marriage is one man, one woman. Gays just don’t enter into it.

      Well, that ideals – one man, one woman – also implies virginity, which implies youth. The purpose of marriage is children.

      As a traditionalist, I want society to aspire to that ideal.

      Now, the WN Feminist brigade, and especially someone like VikingBitch – they are not traditionalists. They find this ideal to be old and outdated, and they are little revolutionaries, not particularly different than Emma Goldman, that want to radically redefine marriage and our romantic customs.

      VikingBitch’s complaints were pretty obvious. She said I “almost” had it right when I joked that I had fun being promiscuous. But suggesting that isn’t ideal is when I got it “wrong.” VB has said over and over again that marriage itself is “Jewed,” that she couldn’t stand being in a monogamous relationship with any man, and she’s raising three freaking test tube babies – and promoting this. Not as if it’s a reasonable compromise people make sometime, but as if it is the ideal. Then, of course, these weird long rants about … pornography. VB – who can’t think her way out of a paper bag – actually suggested that pornography caused the lessening of the economic and social power of middle and working class white men.

      Does this idea of hers make the slightest bit of sense? No, it’s just her bitching about men. “Sure, I’m a slut but you looked at porn!”

      This doesn’t even rise to the level of an argument. This is just squealing.

      The other one, Dark Side of the Moon, she’s just upset that any man dares to disagree with any woman, ever. Suggesting that maybe she – and the four other women that post there – are not the be-all and end-all of the WN movement, and she’s ready to declare everyone misogynist and take her ball and bat and go home.

      I mean, really, the narcissism. Disagree with *her* and it’s like you disagree with all women everywhere? Do women really believe that their ideas don’t matter, cannot be judged, because they have a vagina, therefore they are worthy of attention? If I was reading this attitude from a 17 year old girl, sure. But these are apparently *grown women?*

      Now what do you know – spend a little time reading the anti-feminist blogs like JudgyBitch, Christian blogs like SSM, even cute little Emma the Emo – and the contrast could not be more obvious. I think I understand where the screetching comes from. The vast majority of men want women like JudgyBitch, SSM, and Emma the Emo – you know, feminine women who don’t have weird hangups about men and don’t see “misogyny” everywhere. So if the WN feminist brigade gets compared to these other ones, they are going to come up awfully short.

      Hence, the screetching.

      These “manosphere” boys are sexual reactionaries. For all your completely unjustified complaints about Heartiste, when I started writing parodies for TheRedPill, the handful of times some young woman would say, “I want to marry young. I’m still a virgin. I’m not interested in the hookup culture” – she would get swamped with attention from young boys who feel the same way.

      Yet the older WN feminist convention, they are like cock-blockers or something. Take the absolute worst of feminism and mix it with the absolute worst of church lady prudishness, and that’s the WN feminists in a nutshell.

      It’s kind of like what Dalrock says, feminism is all about being stingy with love. Feminists have this fear that if a woman actually loves a man, she’ll be vulnerable. She might actually start giving up working for her own interests and needs and instead start defining her life around her family. She will lose her “individuality.”

      But really. So you have some young, 19 year old “beta” upset that he’s unlucky in love, and he maybe engages in some locker room talk or a bit of harsh language, and the WN Feminist contingent acts as if someone is “oppressing” them, and of course, takes it 100% personally – as if these young 19 year old boys were thinking about *them* – women his mother’s age – instead of about girls his own age.

      Now, much of the problem is different communication styles. Women have no interest in debating ideas. They want to have people on the internet saying nice things about them, and bad things about “our enemies” – the Jews, blacks, Muslims, homos. It’s all about sitting around stroking each other and “supporting” each other and listening to each other’s feelings, etc. I can almost smell the estrogen.

      So, as the other one said, VikingBitch’s blog is for all those poor dears “ignored” by the evil White Nationalist men and who feel “invisible” because they don’t have a bunch of White Nationalist men telling them what wonderful goddesses they are.

      But – let’s admit this – women get bored as hell sitting around talking to each other, so that is why VB had to reblog that article and start some drama.

      Like

      1. @Hipster Racist:

        The puzzler about VB is that she still remains so un-traditionalist especially after having her son. I confess that I myself was a hardcore “feminazi” who eschewed traditionalism until I ended up with guardianship of a baby boy. When he started walking, I realized that he was subconsciously looking for a father figure when he literally started standing like a friend’s husband (who had to stand that way because he had a war injury).

        I understood that. while he loved me, even though he was very small, he identified with men, so I guess that may have made me take down my defenses and be more receptive to the right man than reflexively paint him with my own misandry brush as I was wont to do before the kiddo came along and upset my apple cart.

        It’s kind of like what Dalrock says, feminism is all about being stingy with love. Feminists have this fear that if a woman actually loves a man, she’ll be vulnerable. She might actually start giving up working for her own interests and needs and instead start defining her life around her family. She will lose her “individuality.”

        Well, I have to respectfully disagree with Dalrock. It’s more about fear of loving in vain. That old Biblical saw about “casting ye pearls before the swine lest they turn on ye and rend ye.” As a Feminazi who was dragged kicking and screaming onto “Team Man” by a cute little six month old boy, I can honestly say that was what was my underlying subconscious motivation, especially since I “enjoyed” a front row seat to my parents’ divorce right about the time I started dating.

        The problem with many a woman is that she is attracted to swinish men and then when her choice acts like the swine he is, no one is more surprised and betrayed than she is, even though she knew all about his “bad boy” rep, because “I’m different.” Thanks to my father’s antics, I refused to take any man, particularly a Corey, that seriously.

        Men have their own version of “swine syndrome,” too, where women are concerned. Really, if you think about it, people take greater due diligence when it comes to hiring suitable employees than finding the right spouse.

        But then there’s a world of difference in the subtlety of really loving someone as opposed to scratching an itch while dressing it up as love. When it’s more about love than sex, than it gives back and enriches in so many ways that it isn’t funny. It’s transformative.

        But back to this whole alpha-beta puzzle. I think the key to that one is found in what Hollywitz spews out. When the Lord of the Rings movies aired, my brother, who was really into the books as a kid, could not get over the popularity of Boromir over Aragorn. Well, Aragorn may have been the hero, but Boromir was the anti-hero.

        We had fundamentally decent, moral upright White Hat Gary Cooper Heroes that somehow got rewritten as uptight hypocritical cowards to cede the field to amoral but oh-so-sexy Clint Eastwood Anti-Heroes. So, women have been indoctrinated to see selfishness in swinish punks as manly strength and the decency of real men of honor as bland, nice guy, bleh, meh material.

        I wasn’t in love with or even initially attracted to my husband when I met him. But we became great friends and I was also a friend of his family and vice versa. Then, I guess, that friendship caught on fire. The better I got to know him, the more I fell in love with him. And I think that’s huge, especially when my own mother admitted, years later, that when she thinks of all the real time she spent with my father during their very modern courtship, she scarcely knew him at all.

        So, I think the folks of the nineteenth century had it right. Divorce was so frowned upon that it was a career killer for men and reputation killer for women. They had long courtships because they had to be sure. The young people of today need to get back to that, develop their own interests and really get to know each other and their families really well before they tie the knot.

        Like

  7. Hey, HR:

    I wanted to add that I in no way meant any disrespect for VB when I said that her remaining so untraditional after she had her first son was a puzzler. She’s quite a bit younger than me and my own experiences predate hers by almost twenty years. In my post at Aryan Skynet, a poster who thought I was too critical about a formal PLE state like Hal Covington suggested and stressed the importance of a multiplicity of approaches.

    So, even though I don’t totally get everything about where VB is coming from, the Multiplicity of Approaches Principle still must apply. I want her to succeed and I want her to find fulfillment and her children to be happy and healthy even though I can’t envision taking her approach myself.

    Whites are too damned critical of each other. I’m going to do my best to refrain from any criticism and if I see some WN blog with a great idea, I’m going to push it for all its worth.

    Like

    1. @Cly

      When he started walking, I realized that he was subconsciously looking for a father figure when he literally started standing like a friend’s husband

      Yeah, I remember you mentioned this anecdote. It’s not surprising at all. Having grown up around hordes of children, it never even crossed my mind it would be different. I remember clearly as a young boy wanting to get away from my little sister and go hang around with the other boys. We have an orphan in the extended family, and when the boy has any chance to go on a ride to the store with one of the men, you can’t stop him – he wants any chance to get away from all the girls and women. I would think it works similarly in reverse, it’s just a natural expression of the sex differences I would think.

      I have nothing personal against VB, but she is just a blogger. I disagree with her most of the time. I don’t consider myself in any sort of “movement” with her, so I couldn’t really care less about “movement harmony” or whatever.

      It’s more about fear of loving in vain.

      I know quite a few self-described feminists – and these are not shrinking violets afraid of men, nor are they the least bit unattractive. They are type-A women with very strong egos. A few of them I know love seducing younger men – men half their age – age differences that would be considered “creepy” if men did it. They are not “afraid of loving in vain” – they are simply the female equivalents of Bill Clinton. They are the type that constantly complain that they just want some casual sex, but these boys keep on having feelings for him. The way they talk about men is the way you would expect some psuedo-rapist frat jock to talk about sorority girls.

      Maybe this is a generational thing – hey I’m not that young, I came of age in the 1990s – but looking around, I just do not see very many vulnerable women terrified of life and love – I see women encouraging other women to be a selfish and as crude and as “stoic” as they presume men are.

      The trick is, though, is that most women don’t really seem to be like that at all. With some peer pressure, they might try that lifestyle for a while, but it doesn’t make them happy.

      Men have their own version of “swine syndrome,” too, where women are concerned.

      You know, I was completely shamed as a young man for even considering that it might not be particularly wise to expect commitment from a “slut” – then was quite surprised when I dated a slut and she acted like, well, a slut.

      I’m pro-woman. My point is this Hook Up Culture game generally speaking works better for women when they are young – and better for men when they are older. The Evil Feminists peer pressure the younger women into being a cynical slut, then otherwise normal women are surprised that when they “hit the wall” a reformed Corey isn’t waiting for them. Hence, the wail of older, washed up feminists everywhere – “where have all the good men gone?” Well, they “traded up” for younger, hotter women.

      Monogamy – as imperfect as it may have been – protected the interests of older women.

      They had long courtships because they had to be sure. The young people of today need to get back to that, develop their own interests and really get to know each other and their families really well before they tie the knot.

      If I have any advice for young men, it is this: meet your prospective wife’s *mother* – if you could stand to be married to her mother at her age, it’s a safe bet. If you cringe at the idea of being married to her mother – run, run away.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s