The Mistake Of Identifying As “Right” Instead Of “Pro-White”

Whether “right wing” or “alt right” or “conservative” or even such right-associated terms as “libertarian,” all the label does is create a ready made excuse to:

a) Exclude Whites from the ingroup.

b) Include non-Whites in the ingroup.

c) Argue over whether an otherwise pro-White person or policy is truly “right wing” or “alt-right” or “conservative” or “libertarian.”

Fortunately, this dynamic helps to clarify things quickly. A Jew like Ben Shapiro can be “conservative” and “anti-left” and “anti-progressive” – he can even be a nationalist (which he is, he’s an Israeli nationalist, a Zionist.)

But Ben Shapiro will never be “White” and he’ll never be a “White Nationalist.” A figure like Ben Shapiro will always, 100% of the time, support Jewish nationalism while attacking White nationalism – any nationalism for Whites. Shapiro will attack immigration restriction in Ireland, Poland, Canada, Italy, and Hungary, but will always support immigration restriction in Israel.

This double standard makes it easy to see exactly what Ben Shapiro is. In theory, there could be an Ashkenazi White Nationalist, there could even be a Zionist Jew that supports White Nationalism, but what’s the point of chasing unicorns?

There are many Blacks and Asians and Arabs that are conservative, right wing, and even nationalist, but they will never be citizens – one of the in-group – in a White nation.

So all being a “conservative” or “right winger” does is to offer up ready made excuses for not being pro-White. To put “conservative principles” or “right wing ideology” above the survival of your race, your people, your family is autism in the extreme, an anti-adaptive trait.

You can’t hug a child with nuclear arms, and you can’t hug a White child with conservative ideology. Ideologies are merely words, a construct of language. People are living beings, flesh and blood. Why should words and ideals take precedence over your own flesh and blood, your own family, your own children?

Commenter Curmudgeon at TOO makes a related point:

On another note, I have long thought the term Alt-Right was a recipe for disaster. The old Left/Right paradigm is long dead, and the sooner nationalists own that label, the better. The majority of people know someone who has a family member or friend that is struggling with economic issues. It is much easier to answer the nonsensical globalist gibberish directly, by answering every statement in terms of ‘why do you care more about the well-being of someone living in a foreign country, whom you have never met, than the well-being of family, friends and neighbours’, and ‘How does immigration make your unemployed neighbour’s life better?’ The truth is, the globalists have no logical answers to these hard questions. Exposing them to folly of their own shallow answers will not turn all of them, I personally have made several unsure of the globalist rant, and turned a few.

“Alt Right” simply became a way to add “right wing” baggage into a promising pro-White movement and led to its destruction. “Neo-reaction” seems to have been created precisely to keep Whites arguing over an ideology and never make racial distinctions – especially, to prevent any mention of the anti-Whiteness of Ashkenazi Jews. In fact, NRx goes to hysterical extremes to include anti-White Ashkenazi Jews as “neo-reactionaries” while anathematizing pro-Whites who object to anti-White Jews or won’t subscribe to various hypothetical intellectual obsessions.

It’s putting the cart before the horse. Without Whites, there aren’t going to be any conservative Whites, nor libertarian Whites. So like a tree falling in the forest with no one around to hear it, no Whites are going to hear you signalling how principled you are about private property rights and the non-aggression principle.

Do you think any non-Whites will care what some conservative, “right wing” libertarian ideologue White thinks about anything?

I’m not White supremacist enough to think they would, or should.

8 thoughts on “The Mistake Of Identifying As “Right” Instead Of “Pro-White”

  1. My position on these CathoReactionary “ironybros” and affiliates changes the more I see them. I know they’re rotten and much of their crap (EM Jones included) is simply odious, repugnant. But now they’ve reorganized themselves behind characters of such high quality as Saint Matt Forney, and one of the “ironybros” (decadent,debauched eternal children) mentioned he did work for the FBI, apparently.
    Analysing what they do, it’s basically ADL MO (the “catholic” element is LARPing – some of them also pose as Orthodox). They isolate, personalize and attack, and their attacks are ALL based on character-assassination, the “image” aspect. They induce guilt by association on normies who would otherwise approach certain personae not for their “charisma” but for their overall ideas. And when repelled, they cry “anti-Christian discrimination”.
    I’m not a fan of Jim Goad by any stretch (barely know him), but his views here are solid. His point about hysterically pointing out “degeneracy” everywhere as being typical of immature existential children is correct. The “holier than thou” brigade – it’s becoming clear now that most of the Right practices the same exact expediency they always accused the Left of doing. Also notice the catholic freaks screeching hysterically on the chat, including the new PUA-recycled-into-NRx Saint Matt himself (pops up almost immediately when mentioned, threatening to show “secret docs” and whining about anti-Xtian bias).
    Reminds me of recycled gangster Tommy Robinson (Stephen Lennon) in Britain. They even invented a cathartic-hollywoodian little story about him being saved by a judicial order moments before being thrown in a cell full of muslim “savages”. And his fantasy name is more known than his real one, interestingly. Symbolic magic. The powers-that-be certainly don’t want whites caring about themselves – they want *clash of civilizations*, and are disposed to crush/infiltrate anything that gets in the way.
    It’s not CathoReac, but more properly CathoSnitch. This thing stinks, and is part of a much bigger, worldwide op that might include Dugin and the protestant-zionist machine. Forgive my theorizing.


  2. It’s like the old “I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it” to which i reply:

    Will blacks defend to the death your right to say the n-word?
    Will jews defend to the death your right to deny the holocaust?
    Will muslims defend to the death your right to insult the prophet?

    No, what they will is fight you to the death!

    Unrelated, maybe your new act could include a podcast!

    Liked by 2 people

  3. Political tendencies have a strong personality component, and thus are largely genetic and thus are not likely to change very much. 20% of whites can’t be reached. Conversely, 80% can, and we can either gamble on dire straights to convert them, or we can convert them with a reasonable program.

    My elevator pitch is a society very similar to the one we have today, except without the people that hate us and want us dead.

    Why is this hard?

    Liked by 1 person

  4. You see the same problem in the Manosphere. Degenerates who aren’t White/European like Roosh going around telling their readers that White women are filth and that racemixing is goodright.

    The “Alt-Right” needs to be confronted with the foolishness of organizing around and granting loyalty to institutions and ideals instead of blood. A race is after all just one extra large family.


    1. @Aldon

      Believe it or not, I’d far rather people loyal to an institution rather than an ideology. An institution is, after all, made up of people. I subscribe to the “Bowling Alone” theory that the hollowing-out of our society has a lot to do with the decay of our institutions, especially the civic society institutions. Not coincidentally, this happened at the same time as mass electronic media (especially television) and enforced “diversity” (read: anti-whiteness.)

      The “manosphere” should have never been a “movement.” If anything, the manosphere could have – should have – spawned a rebuilding of real life, male-only social fraternities. My very first “manosphere” article was all about that, in fact, and I knew I was on to something when it make me a hate-figure for the reddit Blue Pill and crowd.

      The manosphere is right, for the most part, it’s just, what do you do with the “red pill” once you’ve swallowed it? It was just a rediscovery of what everyone already knew before about 2004. What they should have done is stop reading clowns like Roosh and started a social fraternity. It actually leverages the “cheerleader effect” and makes men more attractive to women.

      But the key to a long-lived manosphere site is to keep stroking the resentment of betas and sexual losers, if you “solved the women problem” you wouldn’t get any more hits on your manosphere blog.


  5. Lol the CathoReac crowd strikes Spencer.’s Duginist faggotry.

    It was just a matter of time until the two projects collided. Notice how “Vox Day” (Theodore Beale, a bizarre cult-leader type himself who refused to condemn Anders Breivik, the Templar-Mason shooter in Norway) talks about “pan-nationalism” but avoids the fact that he expects all nations to be Catholic. He’s a CathoGlobalist, and more than a bit on the loony side. His vids have good info but he is insufferable personally. Basically “IQ” and “socio-sexual hierarchy” answers everything, apparently. Faith Goldy is a marionette grifter with botox.
    Weird National-Leftists vs. weird CathoReacs – expect this dynamic to consume the energies of the dissident Right for a long time. Two nasty global projects that i hope destroy each other.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s