Tag Archives: 9/11

Book Plug: Exit Strategy: Navigating the Decline of the American Empire

I’ve become a huge fan of the Myth of the 20th Century podcasts, and I keep on confusing their names, but have finally established that the main guy calls himself “Adam Smith” after the economist. AS is the guy I can most identify with. He has called himself a “representative of heritage America” – like me. He’s completely solid on race – he’s pro-white – and he’s solid on the Jewish Problem, but without a hint of the Hitler-fetishism that has always turned me off. He is also at the least sympathetic to 9/11 truth and perhaps even a 9/11 truther himself. (Politically, that’s all I ask of anyone.)

On one of the podcasts he mentioned he’s a fan of those “primitive technology” videos on youtube – as am I. The first series I saw was of an Aussie dude who started, literally, by banging two stones together, and after a hundred or so videos had built an entire village complete with houses, workshops, a full set of stone tools, and other such cool stuff. Other channels are by two, I guess, Indonesian? boys making some absolutely amazing stuff out of bamboo, and another with a pretty Asian woman making amazing furniture and out buildings out of bamboo using very primitive hand made tools.

For any American boy with that frontier pioneer blood in his veins, this stuff is catnip. I once knew a guy who taught middle schoolers to write fiction and he showed me a bunch of their work. Half of the stuff was basically fanfiction based on TV shows – all garbage. Maybe 10% of the boys and girls would write honestly creative stories and the top few he showed me were of kids writing what is called in anthropology “origin stories.” This includes “where we came from” (always came from somewhere else, in the distant, mythological past, to where we are now which starts ‘history’) and the invention of agriculture.

In fact, not long after my parents died, my older sister gave me a story I had written when I was about five, that my mother had kept. It was exactly and precisely an “origin story” that included all of those things. It started with my parents dying (which I cribbed from Superman, apparently) and then I discovered how to grow food, make tools, hunt animals, then moved to a village and found a wife. (All of the marriage, tribal stuff cribbed from Sunday school stories from the Old Testament.)

So this Adam Smith guy reminds me of my old college roommate. I was living with my first real girlfriend, and her girlfriend, and my other best friend was my ex-girlfriend. While I loved being surrounded by cute college girls, sometimes the estrogen was just too overpowering, so I could always hang out with my college buddy and we would drink beer, smoke weed, and talk about his major, philosophy. AS reminds me of the kind of guy I could have a beer with and spent a couple of hours discussing everything under the sun. That’s why I blog now, because while my ladyfriend is super-smart, straight-A honor student, and knows a lot of things, she is extremely feminine-minded. I have compared her to Deanna Troi of Star Trek, an “empath” and her emotional intuitions have never been wrong. But her eyes will glaze over when I start discussing technical or analytical topics. Considering I live in a state of, essentially, externally-imposed exile and semi-isolation, I can’t stop blogging because this is about the only place I can get that kind of interaction. The guys I see on a daily basis are mostly blue-collar and few are college educated. Not bad people – although a often surprising number of them are, in fact, ex-cons – and not stupid – although some of them are thick as a brick. But I can’t get the kind of conversation I got back in college or when I was a coke-snorting, model-banging aspiring yuppie on Wall Street.

AS was a typically “libertarian” type that got “red pilled.” Libertarianism – the instinct – is the “default” for American men. At my core, I’m a libertarian, although I never got into the Ayn Rand stuff nor (((Austrian Economics))) – I thought Atlas Shrugged and We The Living were good fiction, but I never identified with the characters at all. They seemed like sociopathic, anti-social ideologues. Ayn Rand Libertopianism is not at all compatible with my “libertarian instincts” and thankfully I was never autistic enough to be fully taken in by Austrian pseudoscience.

So the Myth of the 20th Century guys have a website, The American Sun, and there’s an interesting link to an article by theotherlifenow.com titled “Respectability Is Not Worth It.”

Respectability Is Not Worth It (Reply to SlateStarCodex)

This goes over exactly what I’ve been trying to say about the 20th century era of mass electronic media – radio, TV, cinema – and how the internet has changed all that. Some good points about Joe Rogan being the “Tom Brokaw for everyone who only ever watched Brokaw because there was no producer of daily media who specialized in the unique combination of martial arts, weed, and stand-up comedy.”

I’m not really a fan of Rogan’s podcasts, although I am a HUGE fan of his old show, “News Radio” which was one of the best sitcoms in sitcom history (RIP Phil Hartman.) But Joe Rogan is *MAINSTREAM* now. Rogan’s audience is as big as anyone’s. Once the white Baby Boomers die, FOX news is over and something like the Joe Rogan Internet Network will take its place. FOX tries hard to be “cool” with stuff like Gutfeld, but he’s too much of a GOP shill and a “conservative” for anyone to care. As much as shows like Gutfeld try to be “edgy” they simply cannot stray too far off the conservatard plantation.

Same with Alex Jones, as mentioned in the article. Jones is so big that they have to censor him – he’s now utterly banned from Facebook and Instagram and they are even banning regular people linking to InfoWars.com. I hate Alex Jones precisely because he was instrumental in destroying the mainstream 9/11 Truth movement – I am 99.99% sure, in fact, he was literally paid to do that, in fact. But apparently Alex Jones is quite influential.


Someone smarter than I am needs to come up with a coherent theory of communications networks. There is the pre-history, there is the development of the printing press, mass literacy, the Reformation and the Enlightenment, then the newspapers.

But once the media become electronic things began to shift rapidly. You can actually see significant disruption caused by the telegraph especially militarily and economically. FDR became the Stalin of America because of the radio. Christianity was disenfranchised because of television more than anything.

All of these 20th century mass electronic media networks were centralized and broadcast from one central headquarters to “the masses.” The internet has changed that and the story of the 2000s-now is the attempt (somewhat but not entirely successful) at recentralizing the internet via “social media” – Facebook, Google, and Apple. Even the infrastructure is become re-centralized due to Amazon.

But they haven’t exactly won yet and we have a good opportunity to, if not exactly “take over the internet” to at least carve out our own network, technically and socially, if we put in the work.

So I just saw the terrorist video …

Some thoughts …

Nothing indicates to me that it isn’t authentic.

Far less bloody than I expected – horrific and terrorizing, but not bloody or gory.

One guy nearly got the shooter, ran at him and jumped him, if he had had maybe one more second he probably could have overpowered him and beat him to death.

Everyone’s reaction to a shooting is just wrong. Everyone runs and huddles, which just meant the terrorist could kill more people more easily and even take his time.

He seemed to kill most people in the first minute because he took everyone by complete surprise, people heard shooting, ran to the corner or to a window and huddled. They are censoring the video so you won’t watch it and the next time this happens you will do the wrong thing and DIE. They don’t want witnesses.

The guy went back and shot bodies to make sure everyone was dead.

I concur with others, he seemed kind of amateurish, not precision like you see with trained soldiers.

Anyone who says that First Person Shooter video games are not “training” for this sort of thing is lying – even Breivik admits to it. It’s not about teaching tactics, it’s about psychology, it’s about operant conditioning. You spend hours training your brain to remain calm while you shoot hundreds of people at close range. You learn to supress your natural reactions and revulsion.

First Person Shooter video games = operant conditioning for mass shooting.

I realize the reddit young white male “libertarian” crowd will freak out because they love their video games more than anything. Of course I’m not saying that “banning” FPS will change anything, but there’s no question FPS are operant conditioning.

Which brings me to another point the reddit types will hate. If FPS are operant conditioning for mass shooting … what is pornography? The feminists said, “pornography is the theory, rape is the practice.”

Which do redditors like more, their video games or their porn? Hard to say – is there a difference?

A recent poll asked young women what sexual acts their boyfriends were trying to get them to engage in, two were at the top of the list: anal and “facials.”

You’ve got a living, breathing, naked young woman in your bed. You can do anything you want to her. And you want to … stick it in her butt and ejaculate on her face?

That comes from PORNOGRAPHY. Those are not physically pleasurable activities, those are the result of psychological operant conditioning.

As for the shooter, it appears to be what it appears to be. It’s mostly “Counter-Jihad” which is a Zionist movement. It’s clearly inspired by Anders Breivik, who is a ZIONIST and supported Israel – as the Australian terrorist supported Israel.

It is the Zionists who are promoting World War III between Europeans and Muslims, and it’s a one-two punch. First, they get Europeans to invade Muslim lands, then they bring millions of Muslims – mostly, military aged men – into Europe and the West and provoke them to commit terrorism againts Europeans.

When Europeans kill Muslims in Muslim nations, the natural revenge reaction by Muslims against Europeans is suppressed. When Muslims kill Europeans in European nations, they say we need “more” Muslims.

Why? Because they want more terrorism. What is going to happen in New Zealand? They are going to disarm New Zealanders, then import more Muslims and hope for more terrorism

How did this start? Well, it started in 1948 when Western Zionists invaded and occupied Palestine, a Muslim nation. But it really took off on September 11th, 2001, a “false flag” terrorist attack done by the American “Deep State,” the Israeli Fifth Column, and Saudi Arabian mercenaries.

Americans – and especially the odious and fake “White Nationalist movement” – were too cowardly to call that false flag what it was, and enthusiastically cheered for war. Nearly 20 years later the war goes on, any time there’s even a possibility of it slowing down you have a “true flag” – or a “false flag” – attack to keep the hate going.

The solution is obvious: don’t hate, separate. Western Lands for Westerners. Muslim lands for Muslims. Yankee go home, and Achmed go home too.

Arrest maybe 10,000 Anglo-Zionists – not all of them Jews – living in New York, Washington DC, London, UK, and Tel Aviv, Occupied Palestine, put them on trial for crimes against humanity, and everyone go back to their own homelands …

… and PEACE would break out. Can’t have that now can we?

Conservative Lies About Tradition, Example 526


President Barack Obama, Trump’s predecessor, had made a point of his anationalism. For a time, by way of illustration, he refused to wear the traditional flag lapel pin worn by politicians in office.

You see how they lie? They flat out make up lies suggesting that wearing a flag lapel pin is a “tradition,” some long standing habit that US Presidents and Representatives have done. Ask the typical conservative moron and they will probably tell you that George Washington first wore a flag lapel pin until Barack Hussein Obama stopped doing it, probably because the Egyptian Brotherhood told him not to.

Wearing a flag lapel pin is not a “tradition.” It was started by Zionist neo-conservatives in the Bush administration, after 9/11, to make a claim on patriotism.

The same people who let 9/11 happen, on purpose, and in fact were almost certainly directly involved in the plot. They were the opposite of “patriots” – they were traitors. Which is of course why they had to wear a flag pin, to give the appearance of being patriotic while they were committing treason.

The “tradition” dates to October, 2001.

All the military-worship dates to the end of the draft. When American men had to actually join the military and go fight they were quite cynical about the military bureaucracy. But when the draft was ended, all of a sudden these same American men spent a lot of time publically announcing how much they “supported the troops” precisely because they were not about to actually sign up and go die in some third world mudhole because some corporation, headquartered in an off-shore tax haven, wasn’t meeting quarterly revenue goals because some government decided to raise taxes.

So if you aren’t actually going to put your own ass on the line “defending” a corporation you don’t own stock in, the easiest solution is to blabber in public about how much you “support our troops.” It’s easier to wear a two dollar flag pin – made in China – than actually inconvenience yourself joining the military.

And if you are a traitor working for a foreign government, the best way to hide is to wear a flag pin on your suit coat. After all, that is how stupid conservatives are. Literally. They think, “well, that politician is wearing a flag pin, he must support the troops!”

I’d feel a deep sense of shame if anyone were to ever confuse me with a conservative.

Conservatives are the WORST, most EVIL People

Basically, conservatives are the worst, more immoral, most hateful, most awful people. Conservatives should be shunned, expelled from ALL White societies. There is literally nothing worse than a conservative – liberals may be stupid, liberals may be naive, liberals may be even hateful.

But conservatives are an STD, conservatives are a kind of communicable disease, you can’t even breathe in the same room as a conservative without being infected. Conservatives are an infection.

No hate – it’s just you have to quarantine conservatives so you won’t catch the infection.

Sorry. “Right wing” is a synonym for “viral infection that makes you stupid.” It’s literally some sort of virus that infects your brain (your brain being just another organ, like your heart, or your lungs, or your pancreas.) But you think with your brain, so of course – conservatives – being the lowest level of evolution, can’t figure that out.

Here’s the US Navy – the US Navy, being a literal cancer on America – pushing their evil cancer STDs on Americans / White people. Of course, these conservatives want to spread their STDs to the liberals, who – as dumb as liberals are (and liberals are VERY stupid) – know just how to do it.

Liberals, being somewhat isolated from the EVIL FAG MILITARY of the EVIL USA Empire – nevertheless are weak, cowardly faggot who desperately want to get some “credibility” by being “patriotic” by pretending to be somehow involved in the EVIL US military.

If you join the military of America, that basically means you are either a) stupid or b) evil.

Fuck the USA military, FUCK the GOP, FUCK conservatives. Breivik the terrorist is better than all of you. The USA military is an ENEMY of the actual people of America. The USA military is a OCCUPATION force and anyone who bear arms for the Federal Government HATES their own people and the own family.

That INCLUDES Donald Trump, whose entire family is Israeli not American.

Gnon Hates You, God laughs at your calamity, Thank God for Dead Soldiers.

EVIL Reddit tries to sucker Americans to join the EVIL traitor US Navy. The US Navy is basically a satanic traitor club that literally murders their own people like on 9/11 and instead covers up for traitors like Jonathan Pollard.

Anyone who joins the US Navy basically says “I hate my family, I HATE my country.” There is ZERO honor in the US Navy. All 100% of US Sailors are traitors and deserve life in prison, if not worse. The only US sailor I would have an ounce of respect for is one that would kill their officers.

Hang them on the masts. Nuke them. That’s the only way to redeem yourself.

I Hereby Take Back Anything Bad I’ve Said About Roy Moore & Will Allow Him 2nd Base With My Teenage Daughter

In a May 2011 episode, Moore told the two radio hosts, who have repeatedly rejected the official explanation for the 9/11 attacks, that he would be open to hearings looking into “what really happened” on that day.

That’s good enough for me. Have at her, Roy.

Hunter Wallace on the Alt Lite

In Hunter Wallace’s latest interview with Red Ice posted on AltRight.com, he expressed surprise at how the “Alt Lite” is full of homosexuals, degenerates, race mixers, and single people without children. He points out that while these people were welcomed at the “Deplora-Ball” celebrating Trump’s win, regular old-fashioned White Nationalists like he and his wife were excluded. He marvels at how this “Alt Lite” finds Milo – a Jewish homosexual who poses for “art” bathing in pig’s blood and endorses “Twinks for Trump” – completely acceptable but “racists” – i.e., racially conscious White people – are not.

The reason why Wallace is confused is because he misunderstands the nature of the Alt Lite, Donald Trump and his campaign, and the “New Right” phenomenon generally. The main reason he doesn’t understand what is going on is because he’s never taken seriously the events of 15 years ago and everything that has happened since.

The “Alt Lite” – Milo, Gavin McInnis, Lauren Southern, the “Gorilla Mindset” guy – are all only “Alt” because they are Donald Trump boosters.

Well, who is Donald Trump?

The left, the liberals, and the Democrats are of course peddling nonsense when they say that Trump is a “racist” or a “sexist” or an “anti-semite” or “Hitler.” The Democrats say that about all Republicans. The reality should be obvious to everyone:

Donald Trump is a New York liberal Democrat.

So it should not at all be surprising that the people supporting Donald Trump would also be, essentially, urban liberals. These are not social conservatives – neither is Trump. These are not people who are pro-white – neither is Trump. What do they all have in common, aside from the fact that they support Trump?

They hate Muslims and see “radical Islam” as a threat to the West.

In the case of people like Milo and Trump’s other gay fans, one only needs to look to one of the first anti-Muslim European leaders: Pym Fortyn. Back in the early 2000s, Fortyn was the Donald Trump of the Netherlands. He was “socially liberal, economically conservative.” He was a flamboyant homosexual. He opposed mass Muslim immigration precisely because Muslims tended to be socially conservative. Muslim were against homosexuality, liberated women, abortion, pornography and sexual liberation in general.

What Hunter Wallace may be too young to realize is that before the George W. Bush administration, most Muslims in America were Republicans. Many conservative Christians in America saw Muslims as natural allies against social liberalism. Muslims were represented in the pro-life movement. The Bush family was traditionally seen as “Arabist” and had strong ties to the Muslim world through the oil industry.

Well, what happened that turned Republicans and socially conservative Christians against Muslims?

You get two guesses and the first one doesn’t count.

Hunter Wallace may recall his own run-ins a few years ago with the neo-conservative David Frum and his protege, the self-described “Satanic libertarian” Alex K. Alex K was a gay “libertarian” that was strongly anti-Islam, a supporter of the war against Iraq and the Muslim world generaly. Just like Milo, Alex K. was eventually fired because of disturbing sexual comments he made about underage boys, infamously describing the then teenage Justin Bieber as a “Child I’d Life To Fuck.” Milo’s implosion is virtually identical to the implosion of the young neo-con five years ago.

As Donald Trump’s entire career has been promoting anti-racism (i.e., anti-whiteness) gay acceptance, socially liberal values, and sexual liberation, it’s not particularly surprising that those people are his staffers. Also considering that Donald Trump is a long time extremely strong supporter of the Zionist regime in Palestine – actually spending the last decade acting as a proxy for the Likud party – it also shouldn’t be a surprise that Trump is the most anti-Muslim President in US history.

Trump is a neo-con. Obviously.

Neo-conservative Jews have always been strongly anti-White America, strong supporters of mass immigration, strong supporters of social liberalism via issues like “gay marriage” – yet support the exact opposite for Israel, for which they support ethno-nationalism and Jewish supremacy.

Contrary to popular belief, Trump was never an opponent of illegal immigration. Trump spent the Obama years becoming popular among the Republican party base by publicizing the idea that Barak Obama was a Secret Muslim that hated Israel and wasn’t even born in America, and had a fake birth certificate forged perhaps by a conspiracy of the Muslim Brotherhood and the Iranian mullahs. The idea that Trump is a “civic nationalist” is a post-hoc label given to Trump by hopeful fans that really should have known better.

As A. Nolen explained from day one, Trump was allowed to touch a third rail of US politics – mass non-white immigration – because it was a popular issue among the GOP base that was always marginalized by the GOP establishment. Neither the GOP establishment nor the neo-conservatives wanted to make immigration an issue, but it was the one popular issue that immediately turned Trump into the front runner. If illegal immigration hadn’t have caught on, Trump had the trade deals, Common Core, and Obamacare as backups, but that wasn’t needed.

It was after the event that Wallace – and the rest of the Alt Right – have chosen to ignore that Muslim were taken up by the left, at a time when the left, true to their principles of anti-racism and anti-nationalism, became increasingly critical of the apartheid policies of the Zionist entity in Palestine. The European left, and even the European mainstream, were also increasingly taking up the cause of the Palestinians.

So it shouldn’t be a surprise that over the last 15-20 years we have seen the emergence of a “New Right” that is exactly in line with the socially liberal interests of Zionist Jews but makes a completely unprincipled exception for Zionism and Islam.

There’s a direct line between that event, Pym Fortyn, David Frum’s Alex K., Milo and Cernivich and Donald Trump.

The “Alt Right” and the White Nationalists turned against the neo-conservatives of the Bush and Obama years so had to be brought back into the fold. The person who was tasked to do that was Donald Trump, who has so far done an amazingly masterful job.

At the ten anniversary even in New York City, there were two major protest rallies.

One was a rally of conservative Christians and Zionist Jews attacking Muslims and denouncing the so-called “9/11 Victory Mosque” that was supposedly being built at Ground Zero (the entire scandal was fake.)

The other rally was staged by “Act Now To Stop War and End Racism” where a brown Muslim led a crowd of mostly white progressive in a chant of “Allah Akhbar” and spoke in favor of Palestine.

In fact, one may just want to review Donald Trump’s own public statement about that particular event and especially his statements during his campaign against Jeb Bush when Trump … in a room full of conservative Christian Republicans in South Carolina, Bush Country … actually said “vote for me and you’ll find out what really brought down those towers.”

Does anyone doubt that the Bush family got the message loud and clear? George W. Bush himself just came out this weekend to defend Muslims and call Trump a “racist” and an “Islamophobe.”

I guess Trump can say it but when a simple blogger like Hipster Racist says it it’s a “conspiracy theory.”



Not a joke: the #3 leader of Al Qaeda was a California Jew named Adam Pearlman. Look it up even the US military admits it.
Not a joke: the #3 leader of Al Qaeda was a California Jew named Adam Pearlman. Look it up even the US military admits it.

Owning, Spanking, and Tickling Women

Jim at http://blog.jim.com recently wrote an ignorant, deceitful, and completely bullshit article about 9/11. The commenters suggested that someone put him up to it. It’s likely a fair assumption he’s lying because he has to – he’s clearly not stupid enough to believe any of it.

But Jim has some things very right, especially on women. He writes constantly about spanking women, even beating women, and the nature of women and “Pauline marriage” – i.e., the Christian ideal of marriage that was commonplace until maybe 75 years ago.

I can’t help but be partial to a man who understands wife spanking as well as he does – and nothing is funnier to me than reading the comments of men shocked – SHOCKED I tell you – that a man would ever spank his wife, or otherwise dominate her in any way.



We brand cattle and otherwise mark our property, and if you won’t brand your woman, say, tattoo your name on her ass, she’s like to do something awful like cutting herself. Don’t people realize that regular maintenance spankings take care of this? If they don’t get it in real life, they will read 50 Shades of Grey and Twilight and fantasize about it, or make up pornographic Fraternity Rape fantasies like that woman that Rolling Stone wrote about.

I remember the first time a girl told me she was going to kill herself because I never fucked her. We made out a lot, but never went all the way, for various reasons. So after I stopped paying much attention to her, she called me up one night and told me she had swallowed a bunch of pills because she couldn’t live anymore. I had to call her mom, who of course rushed her to the hospital. Trust me – it was a downer.

Then there was the virgin who after a few months of rogering in the back of her daddy’s SUV, told me what she really wanted was for me to tie her up, blindfolded, and rape her. Look folks – she came from a loving family with a doting step-dad (hmm… well she had never met her biological father. Um, never mind.) She was well-adjusted. My parents loved her and wanted us to get married. She was 16 – and at 16 she was already fantasizing about handcuffs and blindfolds. Sure, I did it, but my heart wasn’t in it – I just didn’t get it.

Another girlfriend – who was literally a sex machine that wanted to do it multiple times a day – she would push and push and push until I grabbed her and held her down and raped her – which usually ended with her smiling and humming to herself as she made us dinner afterwards. I may have had all sorts of second-thoughts and complicated emotional reactions about how I treated her, but she sure as hell didn’t. That relationship ended when I stopped – I just didn’t have the energy into dominating her all the time, and so she basicall wandered off. I was pissed, but instead of dragging her by the hair back to my place, I just sort of started ignoring her and we just sort of drifted apart. The after-break-up sex lasted a few more months but the spell had been broken.

Then there was the waitress who matter of factly told me to put my hands around her throat and stop her from breathing when I was fucking her. Not a lot, just a little. She didn’t want me to kill her or anything. She just needed to be immobilized to the point where she couldn’t even breathe, and that was enough to make her orgasm.

And spanking? Good lord. That even barely counts as kinky. That’s just run of the mill routine. Hair pulling? Holding her wrists down? They show stuff like that on prime-time television, it’s so commonplace.

I – of course – was writing about this stuff since before this blog, and it was a regular feature on this blog since the beginning, and I used to get hassled by the “BDSM community” for pointing out how politically incorrect – not to mention anti-feminist – this stuff really is. It points to an impulse, one that comes from millions of years of evolution, that both hard core feminists – and fake “Christian” Male Church Ladies want to pretend doesn’t exist.

50 Shades, of course, but back ten years ago it was “Secretary” – oh, man, you should have seen the ink spilled about that movie. It was hugely popular among the Fashionable Liberal Women set who watches indie films, but it was just so “problematic” they had to write about it over, and over, and over again.

Go back even more and it’s the Story of O. The literary types were adamant it was written by a man, but of course it was written by a woman – ONLY a woman could have written the story of O.

Hitting your woman with a stick

Jim may sometimes exaggerate to make a point, but the point remains. Women aren’t men. They don’t think like men, they don’t fuck like men, they don’t react the way men do. And most men don’t understand them.

The only time I ever lost a woman was because I *didn’t* rough her up, I *didn’t* take ownership, I *didn’t* claim her as my property. Women don’t want a boyfriend or a fuck buddy, they want an owner. Sure – lots of women would rather be owned by her boss rather than her husband, but Boss and Secretary is basically their second most common sexual fantasy, just after “kidnapped by a rival gang/warrior, and enslaved in the harem of a slightly but not too exotic foreign chief, where she fucks/births her way to the top of the harem.

Jim’s also right about race, which makes his cucking over 9/11 so much more disappointing, but I guess you can’t win them all.


Kinky Sex Fetish: A Manhattan Murder Mystery 14

So I’m standing there, not really believing what I’m seeing. I’m asking random people in the crowd, “what happened” and getting various stories.

But wait, hold on. Fast forward, a few weeks. I’m sitting at my desk. Jimmy comes in. He walks over to my table, and throws down a copy of the New York Post in front of Mark, sitting next to me.

Jimmy says, “look at this shit, can you believe this shit?”

So, you know, Jimmy and Mark are looking at the paper, so I stop pretending to work and look at it.

“Wha?” I kind of do a double take.

“What?” Jimmy asks.

I don’t say anything. It’s not everyday – well none of this shit is the kind of thing that happens “every day.” But it’s not everyday you see a guy you used to work with, bound and gagged, on the front page of a tabloid.

Jimmy looks at me suspiciously. I don’t say shit.

Ok, ok. So two years earlier, in California … there was this waitress named Rebecca…



“I say to you: our wombs have been filled with the children of fornication by those sons of apes and pigs who raped us. Or I could tell you that they have defaced our bodies, spit in our faces, and tore up the little copies of the Qur’an that hung around our necks? By God, we have not passed one night since we have been in prison without one of the apes and pigs jumping down upon us to rip our bodies apart with his overweening lust. Kill us along with them! Destroy us along with them! Don’t leave us here to let them get pleasure from raping us.

Leave their tanks and aircraft outside. Come at us here in the prison. They raped me on one day more than nine times. Can you comprehend? Imagine one of your sisters being raped. Why can’t you all imagine it, as I am your sister. With me are 13 girls, all unmarried. All have been raped before the eyes and ears of everyone. They took our clothes and won’t let us get dressed. As I write this letter one of the girls has committed suicide. She was savagely raped. A soldier hit her on her chest and thigh after raping her. He subjected her to unbelievable torture. She beat her head against the wall of the cell until she died, for she couldn’t take any more.Brothers, I tell you again, fear God! Kill us with them so that we might be at peace. Help! Help! Help!”



SUBJECT: Visit to Project [deleted]

1. On this day the writer spent the day observing experiments with Mr. [deleted] on project [deleted] and in planning next year’s work on the project (Mr. [deleted] has already submitted his proposal to the [deleted]).

2. The general picture of the present status of the project is one of a carefully planned series of five major experiments. Most of the year has been spent in screening and standardizing a large group of subjects (approximately 100) and the months between now and September 1 should yield much data, so that these five experiments should be completed by September 1. The five experiments are: (N stands for the total number of subjects involved in the experiment.)

7. A Very favorable impression was made on the writer by the group. The experimental design of each experiment is very carefully done, and the standards of detail and instrumentation seems to be very high.

Though she didn’t know it, her modeling career was facilitated by Richard Fuisz (pronounced fuse), a former actor, psychiatrist, pediatrician, congressional candidate, whistle-blower, and entrepreneur who declines to comment on a published report that he has intelligence ties. Fuisz, who owned a company that did joint ventures in Moscow, was approached by the then-Soviet ambassador to Washington, Yuri V. Dubinin, to set up a modeling agency to prepare the first waves of Soviet beauties for American commerce (which often meant substantial dental work) and protect them from “adverse influences” and bad publicity like magazine “spreads about their teeth,” Fuisz says.

Gagged Businessman
Gagged Businessman