The entire libertarian rhetoric about “collectivism” seems to come from Ayn Rand, who preached “individualism” and a rejection of “collectivism” for Whites while calling her Jewish ingroup “the Collective” and promoting Zionism – a collectivism for Jews. Typical chutzpah, typical Jewish double standards: nationalism for me but not for thee.
“Individualism” in the Enlightenment sense tended to mean a rejection of a hereditary aristocracy and instead an embrace of a hierarchy of individual merit. That sense of individualism was compatible with duty to a people and a nation, and no one thought of individualism as somehow in opposition to one’s duty to a family or tribe or race.
Individualism of today is expressed by a man or women rejecting the basic duty to family; in feminism we see a feigned horror at the idea that a woman’s duty is to bear grandchildren for one’s own parents, we see a lazy rejection by men of any sense of duty to a wife, family, or a community. We see a rejection of organic collectives: family, tribe, race, nation, and instead a collectivism based on abstract ideologies.
Quite a bit of the libertarian instinct is likely a rather healthy rejection of forced integration in modern America, it is a rejection of an artificial collective based on citizenship or “Americanism” that requires one to sacrifice self-interest, and even organic collective interests, to an artificial state enforced collective. But since it’s forbidden to openly embrace a collective identity based on race and nation, well meaning libertarians counter-productively simply reject “collectivism” out of hand.
Libertarianism itself is an artificial tribe based on usually poorly thought out political abstractions.
In fact, since the organic collectivism of race, tribe, and family are all but forbidden, we see the emergence of the most toxic individualism/collectivism of all: consumerism. Humans are social creatures by nature, so we see laughably artificial “tribes” forming around such trivialities as music styles, fashion, films, and cringe-worthy fandom based on TV cartoons such as anime.
All that was a long winded way of coming to my main point, which is that people who are part of a collective based around “anime” should be placed in death camps.
I keep on reading that Ramzpaul is a “cuck” or is somehow secretly “controlled by the Jews” or something.
Yet at least half if not more of RamZPaul’s videos deal with Jewish power, Jewish double standards, and Israeli control of US foreign policy. He is FAR more consistent on this issue than virtually anyone else in the “Alt Right.”
Here RamZPaul yet again points out who is really in control, who is behind the attacks on Syria, who both the Republicans and Democrats are afraid to call out. Lots of people on the Alt Right are saying that Trump is giving in to the “neo-cons” or “John McCain” or “the globalists” or “the Deep State” but for some reason most are avoiding that word: ISRAEL.
You know, Israel, the shitty little country half way around the world? Jared Kushner is an Israeli, son of an Israeli, who works in the interests of Israel. The PM of Israel, Netanyahu, demanded that Trump attack Assad in Syria – and Trump followed orders.
So why won’t the rest of the Alt Right come out and say the obvious? Either you get people dancing around the issue, or you have the (((Hollywood Nazis))) adding some cartoonish mystification – it’s “the Jew” or it has something to do with the “Talmud” or the “Protocols of the Elders of Zion” or “Hitler” or something.
Nope – nothing to do with any of that at all. It has to do with AIPAC and the powerful Jews that run America – Schumer, Kushner, the Google execs, the Facebook guy, Wolf Blitzer, the ADL, the $PLC, WINEP, the Jew run media networks.
At least RamZPaul says it clearly, without any mystification or exaggeration.
Which may explain why RamZPaul is ALWAYS attacked by the more, er, “colorful” of the supposedly pro-white internet properties…
In Hunter Wallace’s latest interview with Red Ice posted on AltRight.com, he expressed surprise at how the “Alt Lite” is full of homosexuals, degenerates, race mixers, and single people without children. He points out that while these people were welcomed at the “Deplora-Ball” celebrating Trump’s win, regular old-fashioned White Nationalists like he and his wife were excluded. He marvels at how this “Alt Lite” finds Milo – a Jewish homosexual who poses for “art” bathing in pig’s blood and endorses “Twinks for Trump” – completely acceptable but “racists” – i.e., racially conscious White people – are not.
The reason why Wallace is confused is because he misunderstands the nature of the Alt Lite, Donald Trump and his campaign, and the “New Right” phenomenon generally. The main reason he doesn’t understand what is going on is because he’s never taken seriously the events of 15 years ago and everything that has happened since.
The “Alt Lite” – Milo, Gavin McInnis, Lauren Southern, the “Gorilla Mindset” guy – are all only “Alt” because they are Donald Trump boosters.
Well, who is Donald Trump?
The left, the liberals, and the Democrats are of course peddling nonsense when they say that Trump is a “racist” or a “sexist” or an “anti-semite” or “Hitler.” The Democrats say that about all Republicans. The reality should be obvious to everyone:
Donald Trump is a New York liberal Democrat.
So it should not at all be surprising that the people supporting Donald Trump would also be, essentially, urban liberals. These are not social conservatives – neither is Trump. These are not people who are pro-white – neither is Trump. What do they all have in common, aside from the fact that they support Trump?
They hate Muslims and see “radical Islam” as a threat to the West.
In the case of people like Milo and Trump’s other gay fans, one only needs to look to one of the first anti-Muslim European leaders: Pym Fortyn. Back in the early 2000s, Fortyn was the Donald Trump of the Netherlands. He was “socially liberal, economically conservative.” He was a flamboyant homosexual. He opposed mass Muslim immigration precisely because Muslims tended to be socially conservative. Muslim were against homosexuality, liberated women, abortion, pornography and sexual liberation in general.
What Hunter Wallace may be too young to realize is that before the George W. Bush administration, most Muslims in America were Republicans. Many conservative Christians in America saw Muslims as natural allies against social liberalism. Muslims were represented in the pro-life movement. The Bush family was traditionally seen as “Arabist” and had strong ties to the Muslim world through the oil industry.
Well, what happened that turned Republicans and socially conservative Christians against Muslims?
You get two guesses and the first one doesn’t count.
Hunter Wallace may recall his own run-ins a few years ago with the neo-conservative David Frum and his protege, the self-described “Satanic libertarian” Alex K. Alex K was a gay “libertarian” that was strongly anti-Islam, a supporter of the war against Iraq and the Muslim world generaly. Just like Milo, Alex K. was eventually fired because of disturbing sexual comments he made about underage boys, infamously describing the then teenage Justin Bieber as a “Child I’d Life To Fuck.” Milo’s implosion is virtually identical to the implosion of the young neo-con five years ago.
As Donald Trump’s entire career has been promoting anti-racism (i.e., anti-whiteness) gay acceptance, socially liberal values, and sexual liberation, it’s not particularly surprising that those people are his staffers. Also considering that Donald Trump is a long time extremely strong supporter of the Zionist regime in Palestine – actually spending the last decade acting as a proxy for the Likud party – it also shouldn’t be a surprise that Trump is the most anti-Muslim President in US history.
Trump is a neo-con. Obviously.
Neo-conservative Jews have always been strongly anti-White America, strong supporters of mass immigration, strong supporters of social liberalism via issues like “gay marriage” – yet support the exact opposite for Israel, for which they support ethno-nationalism and Jewish supremacy.
Contrary to popular belief, Trump was never an opponent of illegal immigration. Trump spent the Obama years becoming popular among the Republican party base by publicizing the idea that Barak Obama was a Secret Muslim that hated Israel and wasn’t even born in America, and had a fake birth certificate forged perhaps by a conspiracy of the Muslim Brotherhood and the Iranian mullahs. The idea that Trump is a “civic nationalist” is a post-hoc label given to Trump by hopeful fans that really should have known better.
As A. Nolen explained from day one, Trump was allowed to touch a third rail of US politics – mass non-white immigration – because it was a popular issue among the GOP base that was always marginalized by the GOP establishment. Neither the GOP establishment nor the neo-conservatives wanted to make immigration an issue, but it was the one popular issue that immediately turned Trump into the front runner. If illegal immigration hadn’t have caught on, Trump had the trade deals, Common Core, and Obamacare as backups, but that wasn’t needed.
It was after the event that Wallace – and the rest of the Alt Right – have chosen to ignore that Muslim were taken up by the left, at a time when the left, true to their principles of anti-racism and anti-nationalism, became increasingly critical of the apartheid policies of the Zionist entity in Palestine. The European left, and even the European mainstream, were also increasingly taking up the cause of the Palestinians.
So it shouldn’t be a surprise that over the last 15-20 years we have seen the emergence of a “New Right” that is exactly in line with the socially liberal interests of Zionist Jews but makes a completely unprincipled exception for Zionism and Islam.
There’s a direct line between that event, Pym Fortyn, David Frum’s Alex K., Milo and Cernivich and Donald Trump.
The “Alt Right” and the White Nationalists turned against the neo-conservatives of the Bush and Obama years so had to be brought back into the fold. The person who was tasked to do that was Donald Trump, who has so far done an amazingly masterful job.
At the ten anniversary even in New York City, there were two major protest rallies.
One was a rally of conservative Christians and Zionist Jews attacking Muslims and denouncing the so-called “9/11 Victory Mosque” that was supposedly being built at Ground Zero (the entire scandal was fake.)
The other rally was staged by “Act Now To Stop War and End Racism” where a brown Muslim led a crowd of mostly white progressive in a chant of “Allah Akhbar” and spoke in favor of Palestine.
In fact, one may just want to review Donald Trump’s own public statement about that particular event and especially his statements during his campaign against Jeb Bush when Trump … in a room full of conservative Christian Republicans in South Carolina, Bush Country … actually said “vote for me and you’ll find out what really brought down those towers.”
Does anyone doubt that the Bush family got the message loud and clear? George W. Bush himself just came out this weekend to defend Muslims and call Trump a “racist” and an “Islamophobe.”
I guess Trump can say it but when a simple blogger like Hipster Racist says it it’s a “conspiracy theory.”
Of course. Nixon famously made peace with China to break up the Soviet-Sino Axis. During the Clinton era, USA economically merged with China at a time when Russia was down and out.
Under Bush and Putin, Russia and China began repairing their breached relationship and famously instituted the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, cutting out the US and even to some degree the EU.
Now, Trump is drawing in Russia in order to isolate China.
This is the sort of thing that we learned in Current Studies classes in high school – and not just honor classes, this was stuff that your average white suburban high school senior was expected to be able to write intelligently about.
What about now?
Now, the liberals on Reddit.com speculate that Trump is controlled by Russia because Putin has a video of him peeing on Russian hookers.
It’s no better on the right – the failed White Nationalists and recently self-defeating “Alt-Right” couldn’t even begin to write a coherent thought about foreign policy. The best they can do is “nuh-huh, Trump is not a Russian spy” and “Putin is against the fags yeah!”
It’s true that general interest foreign policy may be out of band for the WN movement proper – but it certainly isn’t for the “Alt Right.” But the “Alt Right” has frankly done little more than act as an unpaid and unwanted cheer-leading section for Trump. Having virtually zero influence on the elections (it was the hated Alt Lite at Breitbart.com that actually helped Trump win – on economic issues mostly) all the “Alt Right” has been able to accomplish is to squash any criticism of Trump’s intimate ties to the Israel lobby and his decades long toadying for them.
The elite of the Aryan Race are simply not well represented in the WN movement, nor the Alt Right. True, they do have some leading lights – Drs. Andrew Joyce and Kevin MacDonald, for instance, and some really good essay writers like Gregory Hood – but aside from the big brains, the footsolders are dregs. From the IRL activists that show up and do media stunts that accomplish absolutely nothing except making the movement look like it’s full of ugly nutjobs, to the online commenters which give the impression it’s populated by stupid nutjobs who may or may not be ugly – online, aside from the essay writers – the Alt Right is all about Trump memes and Japanese cartoon porn.
The typical Alt Right denizen would not be able to watch this short clip on foreign policy and write an essay that would receive a “B” in a typical middle class suburban high school in 1996.
Now that Trump won, hopefully the hasbara shills will lose interest and we can begin the hard work of building a pro-white movement that represents the BEST – not the WORST – of our race.
Liberal girls always seem to be imagining strong, rough, Heathcliff-type white men demanding that they disrobe or become “sex slaves.” (Oddly, Heathcliff keeps doing this in well-trafficked areas in the middle of the day with no witnesses.)
The hijab hoaxer at the University of Michigan described her imaginary Trump-supporting pursuer as white, in his 20s or 30s, with an athletic build, unkempt and intoxicated. He demanded that she remove her hijab. (After a police investigation, she admitted she made it up.)
The alleged hijab victim at University of New Mexico, Leena Aggad, said her hijab was ripped off by “a really buff guy wearing a Trump shirt.” (The attack was serious enough for her to tell the media about it, but not serious enough to report it to campus security, much less the police.)
A 28-year-old black woman, Kara Stevens, claimed three Trump-supporting white men in their 30s approached her in a Safeway parking lot in Hillsboro, Oregon, mentioned Donald Trump — then threatened to turn her into their “sex slave”! (Investigation suspended with no video, no witnesses and no evidence.)
With a little more imagination, these stories could become the new “Fifty Shades of Grey.”
I was, of course, writing “Liberal Girls Ravished By Right Wingers” Rape Porn before it was cool.
In fact, it seems that yours truly may in fact be the original “Alt-Left” – usually defined as the “left wing of the Alt-Right.” Not only does the Official Alt-Left site, AltLeft.com, link this blog, but anyone reading the description of what the “Alt Left” is can recognize this writer’s influence:
[The Alt Left] was always meant to augment the AltRight, not outright oppose it. It was a way to view and examine the affects of multiculturalism and political correctness from a cultural and economically left lens as well as from a secular and futurist perspective rather than the radical traditionalist, socially conservative one that dominates right wing circles. In other words, recognizing the implicit whiteness that underpins the identities of progressive cities like Seattle or Portland, and asserting that it must become explicit to some degree in order for those places to maintain their culture, aesthetic and quality of life. It was to put forth the idea that someone can be pro-white without the albatross of traditionally conservative culture, pre-modern aesthetics, capitalist economics, or widely accepted republican historical dogma.
Going back to nearly the beginning of the old MindWeaponsInRagnarok site, and the original post using the handle “Hipster Racist,” shows that this writer was doing it before anyone else was. We were celebrating the implicit racism of Portlandia since the beginning.
In fact, the entire concept of “hipster racist” was in fact an anti-white talking point gaining serious cultural currency until this writer co-opted it as pro-white, and few anti-white Social Justice Warriors have attempted to wield it seriously since.
Not only that, the original Alt Righter, Richard Spencer, has personally thanked Hipster Racist for inspiring his use of the term “hipster racism” nearly five years ago.
Like the Velvet Underground, I never sold a lot of records – but the people who did buy my records all went on to be rock stars themselves. I didn’t influence the masses, I influenced the elites who then went on to influence the masses.
Anglin is just the clown out in front – remember, just a few years ago Anglin was railing against “racists” and “anti-semites” and talking about how Jews are just so smart which is why Evil Whitey is so “Nazi.”
Then, Anglin turned on a dime, and started the well-funded (((Daily Stormer))) website, to co-opt the growing Alt Right movement and smear it by association with (((Hollywood Nazi.))) That’s their job, and there are obviously professionals behind the clowns like Anglin. The (((Daily Stormer))) used to publish (((Joshua Goldberg))) a Jewish propagandist working the (((Rita Katz))) of SITE, a well known Israeli Mossad front group in Washington DC.
So, a few Jews went to the NPI conference and “Sieg Heiled” for the camera along with the Asian porn star Tila Tequila, and now Andrew Anglin, the (((Daily Stormer))) the ADL and the SPLC – along with the Jewish media – is making up a completely fake story about Richard Spencer and NPI somehow being involved in … “naaaaaazis!” Of course, Anglin and the (((Daily Stormer))) are working hand in hand with Jews to associate the Alt Right in general, and Spencer/NPI in particular, with (((Hollywood Nazism.)))
Anyone who wasn’t born yesterday has seen this gimmick over and over again. If you bring it up, like the Alt Right’s Colin Lidell does, you’ll be trolled and spammed by Anglin’s little troll army of JDL operatives.
The were successful, now Trump and Brietbart have the excuse they needed to “denounce” the Alt Right, and anytime Spencer or NPI does anything, the ADL, the JDL, the $PLC – and Andrew Anglin and the (((Daily Stormer))) – will be there to draw a Hitler mustache on them.
That’s how the game is played, time for people to wise up.
If Andrew Anglin was actually interested in promoting the interests of White people and was actually sympathetic to the Alt Right, he would:
1. Stop trying to co-opt the alt-right movement, which is not, and has never, been, or had anything to do with, neo-Nazis, trolls or otherwise.
2. Stop calling himself “Alt Right” – he’s not – and instead just be honest: he’s a neo-Nazi. He should change his blog header to say “Number One Neo-Nazi Site Online.” That’s true, and he can be proud of his accomplishment.
But Anglin won’t do that, because Anglin is not interested in helping the Alt Right – and probably doesn’t care about White people either. He’s quite clear about his goals:
3. Associating the Alt Right generally with Hitler, the Nazis, and Holocaust Shtick.
Not coincidentally, Andrew Anglin and the anti-Whites at the SPLC and the ADL share at least Goal #3.
Isn’t it interesting that Anglin & the Daily Stormer (along with certain other costume clowns) have spent untold digital ink on smearing the man who coined the “Alternative Right” name as a homosexual – along with that other group of people who share one of his main goals, the SPLC?
No, we’re not just talking about a joke – Anglin and his internet trolls have spent quite a bit of time libeling and slandering the person who invented the term “Alternative Right” with long homoerotic fictional tales and even accusations of felony rape. Sometimes this was meant as a joke – but sometimes clearly not a joke.
Anglin’s shtick may appeal to some teenage boys. Anglin’s shtick may, in fact, help to some degree in mocking Holocaust Hitler Hysteria that anti-Whites are always promoting (although more intelligent and funnier trolls like at TheRightStuff.biz are better at that.)
But Anglin’s pretense at being on the side of the Alt Right – just having different tactics – ua betrayed by his actions.
The fact that his site “just happened” to promote Joshua Goldberg, a Jewish terrorist posing as a “neo-Nazi” and an “ISIS sympathizer” – just makes his whole outfit even more suspicious.
But we know that Anglin isn’t going to go away. We know that Anglin will continue to try to associate the pro-White movement and the Alt Right with Hitler, the Holocaust, Hollywood Nazis and the rest of the SPLC/ADL agenda.
We know that Anglin will never just leave the Alt Right alone and do his own neo-Nazi thing.
So, the only thing that the Alt Right can do is to denounce him, forcefully, as the Jew shill he appears to be. Failing that, just distance themselves from him – whatever Anglin is, he is not us.
Ram Z Paul explained it. When he was asked to do an interview about the Alt Right, he immediately realized they were really doing a story about Anglin and the Daily Stormer, in order to smear the Alt Right by association with Anglin. Ram Z Paul did what he could – he said the Daily Stormer were neo-Nazi trolls and had nothing to do with the Alt Right.
As Anglin said, they are going to smear us as “neo-Nazis” anyway. But unlike Andrew Anglin, that does NOT mean we should side with Andrew Anglin, the Daily Stormer, the SPLC, and the ADL.
I’m not a Nazi, I’ve never been a Nazi. Neither are Kevin MacDonald, Richard Spencer, Jared Taylor, or Ram Z Paul. Neither are 90% of the people who identify with the Alt Right.
The Alternative Right is NOT led by Andrew Anglin and his neo-Nazi trolls. Nor is the Alt Right led by the homosexual Jew Milo and the neo-con pro-Israel site Breitbart.com.
Hillary Clinton, the SPLC, the ADL, the anti-Whites and Andrew Anglin all share the same goals – and those goals are not the same as ours.
Here’s a fun trick – go to your favorite Alt-Right, New Right, White Nationalist, Race Realist, White Right whatever site. Go through their articles for the last few years. Read what some of them were saying about ISIS – ISIL – “Islamic State” whichever.
Now read this article, and read between the lines. What are the elements of the headline?
ISIS – imaginary battle – never existed – Twitter hoax.
Now, this is not a “conspiracy theory” because it’s published in a “legitimate” media organ. Instead, it’s a “hoax” and that fooled “ISIS supporters” from “around the world” on “Twitter.”
On the other hand, if Hipster Racist were to suggest that media coverage of “ISIS” included “faking pictures” and “Photoshopp[ing] an image” we’d call it a “crazy conspiracy theory.” That is, until The Independent publishes a story about a “hoax.”
As Mr Mahmoud’s “breaking news” gained traction with re-tweets, other Iraqis joined in the fun by faking pictures that both Isis and militia supporters believed were real.
Now, if some random Iraqi that is “critical of the Iraqi government” but “hates ISIS” can fool a worldwide contingent of … “ISIS supporters” … on Twitter … which are regularly reported on in the “real news” as representative of the pro-ISIS faction of Muslims worldwide …
… then the actual participants in whatever real wars on going on can – and DO – their own “photoshopping” and “faking pictures.”
In fact, it would be job number ONE for any competent psy-ops staffer.
Yet the “best and brightest” of the White Right, Alt-Right, New Right, and White Nationalists pretend to take war propaganda at face value. Not a single photograph is questioned as legitimate, not a single video timestamp can ever be discounted, not a single “Tweet” from an official “Twitter account” can ever be taken as anything other than sincere, with varying shades of truthiness.
Because to even suggest otherwise would be to “get involved in conspiracy theories.”
Lots of lefties in the Bush administration thought that “dissidents” like Amy Goodman and Noam Chomsky were really speaking “truth to power” and were actually so “controversial” they were “censored” from the mainstream. Over time, it was obvious that, far from being “dissidents” Goodman and Chomsky were, in fact, an important part of the propaganda of the power structure, and would censor stories and issues that were really important and really controversial.
I’ve only been reading the WN sites for about five years, but you can already tell which “alt right” sites are not, in fact, “dissidents” at all and far from “speaking truth to power” they merely enforce one end of the acceptable spectrum.