Tag Archives: bondage

Bang Gang: The Second Sexual Revolution: No Coloreds, No Fags, No Rape, No Jealousy

Revolution Next

By the 1990s, the AIDS scare was over and everyone realized that the plague was confined to male homosexuals, needle drugs, and Africans. The sexual chill of the 1980s was over: the popular culture of film and music had continued to get more and more explicit – some would say “degenerate” – even while people’s actual behavior had become puritanical. The social shift was centered around the mainstreaming of condoms. The official story was that teenagers were going to have sex anyway so they should use condoms to avoid AIDS and pregnancy.

While the first sexual revolution of the 1960s still had double standards and jealousy, the second sexual revolution had shifted. If everyone was promiscuous, then no one was a “slut.” Since no one was getting married or having children any time soon, teenage relationships were by nature temporary and among peers partners were swapped: Jane dated Billy for a while, then Jane hooked up with Billy’s friend Mike while Jane’s friend Sally started dating Billy. The timeline simply got shorter and the number of partners increased.

So it was only a matter of time until the timeline of the relationships got shorter and the partner swapping more immediate. High school parties where couples would disappear into a bedroom simply evolved into high school parties where more than one couple would be in the bedroom, or on the same bed. Or where there weren’t couples as much as groups.

The Rules

Still, there were some lines that were simply not crossed, at least in the 1990s middle to upper middle class Washington DC suburbs of the 1990s. The rules were essentially non-negotiable:

1. No coloreds. Maybe a half Korean girl would be in the mix occasionally, but like an Abercrombie and Fitch catalog, this was a very White affair. Washington DC, even in the 1990s, was most certainly a racially diverse area, but integrated schools had not led to integrated social circles, and rarely intimacy. All throughout the 1980s Black and White couples were lauded by the media (OJ & Nicole) and the United Colors of Bennetton had spent a decade trying to push a slightly less sexual version of the Abercrombie and Fitch orgy aesthetic, but to no avail.

2. No fags. Male homosexuality was simply not tolerated. This was an era when gays were “coming out of the closet” and TV shows like Friends made it clear that “homophobia” was uncool. Nevertheless, teenage boys, even if they talked the talk, were simply not going to walk the walk. They may not have been going around queer bashing but neither were they going to invited suspected gays, much less out gays, to their parties. And the occasional friend, suspected or known to be gay, that was invited to a social party were simply never invited to the after parties.

Of course “bi-curious” girls were not even considered “lesbian,” merely a form of exhibitionist foreplay.

3. No rape. This was the era of third wave feminism. It was not cool to do something to a girl who was passed out – that passed out girl was your friend. It simply was not considered manly and a rough form of “consent” was expected. Of course “peer pressure” wasn’t considered “coercion” and it would be another decade before concepts like “rape culture” would be popularized – quite possibly precisely because a decade or so of these attitudes created a backlash, and the teenage girls who organized these parties had to regain some plausible deniability.

4. No jealousy. Of course people did get jealous, but no one owned anyone and when people did pair off and form serious couples, they simply didn’t go to the parties anymore. This was in a sense, “sexual utopia in power” and F. Roger Devlin might say. Women – really, girls – were the organizers here. They decided which boys to invite and it was their consent that powered the whole culture.

The Style

The style was rave, baby doll dresses and neo-bohemian. The soundtrack was electronic dance music and alternative rock. The drugs were alcohol, marijuana, and MDMA. (LSD and mushrooms were quite often the initiation into the scene, but those aren’t party drugs.)

No one knew anything about “BDSM” or even what it meant, the blindfolds and bondage were simply party favors, a natural development. There was always a certain “switch” dynamic – both boys and girls could be the one being blindfolded and “worked,” but the few times when an actual male submissive would want some sort of humiliation play, it would skeeve the girls out; he would be labeled a “creep” and no longer invited to the parties.

The age to play? 16.

The Hangover

Of course, as always, standards began to slip after the first generation. LGBT became more militant. Consent became blurry. Jealousy, always present, became more pronounced as “experimentation” morphed into “lifestyle” and the window of opportunity to leave it all behind got smaller. It you’re in the scene from 16-26, you’ve had a decade of experience at temporary “relationships” and zero experience with keeping anything permanent. The color line started to blur, which ruined the entire concept of consent, as consent is a cultural norm, shared among those with the same race and culture. Little sisters were not rebelling against the sexual chill of the 1980s as their older sisters had done, thus had a “starting point” that was much further along than their older siblings.

The impact of internet pornography started to be felt. Before, the parties, the social scene, WAS the initiation – it WAS the porn. Once hard core internet pornography went mainstream, boys – and girls – already had expectations, and the expectations were no longer set by peers in their own social circles, but by professional pornographers and pimps from Los Angeles, always eager to “segment” a market in order to micro-market to fetishes with pin point accuracy.

There’s all the difference in the world between BEING the product, and watching a product being advertised.

The End

What finally killed it off was camera phones and social media. Rumors can be denied, video evidence broadcast instantly to thousands could not.

Toronto Film Review: ‘Bang Gang (A Modern Love Story)’

The Future

As the Unabomber Ted Kazinsky might say, technology affects everything and society gets further and further away from the natural order. Only an industrial society would postpone marriage and family formation long past a biologically appropriate age in order to spend the youth’s most productive years learning to run the machines and push the paperwork. Feeding the machine becomes more important that reproducing the race; the machines become more important than the biology. So society will go back and forth between repression and degeneracy as long as it suppresses biology.

The Onion: Teen Wastes Prime Childbearing Years Going To High School

http://www.theonion.com/article/teen-wastes-prime-childbearing-years-going-to-high-33891

Women don’t want their grievances fixed, you silly boys. They want them heard.

Women don’t want their grievances fixed, you silly boys. They want them heard.

http://takimag.com/article/thanks_for_nothing_bitches_kathy_shaidle/

I swear I’m not making this up.

My girlfriend at the time, a Hillary loving, NPR listening, hardcore “outside of the bedroom” feminist, stereotypical liberal – no, not one of those idealistic Bernie Sanders people, but a practical minded type that went with the mainstream of the Democratic party – she actually explained to me, way, way back in 2007, that tampons should be “free” – meaning, paid for collectively by the taxpayer, not individual women.

The logic apparently went something like this: women have periods but men don’t, and that’s not fair, so the government should pay for tampons.

I thought this was crazy, and like the clueless man that I am, I mansplained about how taxes work which just made her angrier that I didn’t get it.

She voted for Hillary in 2008 and hated the fact Obama won so much she actually did vote Green, but only because in New York it didn’t matter anyway.

Frankly I think she was kind of racist. She didn’t have any black friends and her great-grandfather was an actual SS officer back in the day.

As with many things, she was far ahead of her time. She was into the IRL “50 Shades of Gray” thing long before the book or the movie came out. And it wasn’t until recently that single payer period care became a serious political issue.

“Free [sic] Tampons Should Be a Human Right”

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/free-tampons-human-right_us_56deffbce4b03a40567a1e33

tender-submissives
One thing I’ll give her though: as a bona fide fashionista, always dressed to kill in dominatrix boots and crypto-fetish gear (the kind that you have to be “in the know” to get the subtle references – she could attend a Democratic party fundraiser in a little black dress and still find a way to accessorize with something faintly bondagey) …

… she wouldn’t be caught dead wearing a “pussy hat.” Like, ever.

tampons-and-razors

Taylor Swift Writing New 50 Shades of Grey Song

It’s like all my Taylor Swift fantasies are coming true right in front of my eyes.

I dated a Taylor Swift look-a-like once. And yes, she was a huge Taylor Swift fan herself.

Is there anything more wonderful in life than the thought of Taylor Swift, in one of her outfits, looking up at you saying, “what are you going to do with that belt?” I can’t think of any.

All you conspiracy theorists out there – yes, we do go to parties and wear masks and do sexy stuff. The ladies love it.

illuminatiwatcherdotcom-taylor-swift-style-mind-control-mirror-eye

Jewish Women Are Having S&M Sexual Fantasies About Trump as Hitler

You people all thought I was kidding:

https://hipsterracist.wordpress.com/50-pounds-of-heidi

http://eradica.wordpress.com/50-pounds-of-heidi

But Jewish women are now publishing their own Trump Nazi S&M fantasies themselves:

http://www.unz.com/isteve/the-forward-how-do-i-explain-my-trump-nazi-nightmare-to-my-mexican-american-daughter/

How Do I Explain My Trump Nazi Nightmare to My Mexican American Daughter?

Anna Keller

October 21, 2016

I have a terrible recurring dream. I’m hiding in the attic with Anne Frank and she’s calling me “Kitty.” I tell her that I have to go, I don’t know where my daughter is, and she turns to me and tells me that we can’t go anywhere. We are in hiding and we must stay this way until the war is over. All of a sudden, I hear boots on the stairs and the door swings open and it’s Donald J. Trump — only he’s naked, wearing a swastika sweatband on his head, and he says, “I think Islam hates us.”

As usual, I’m ahead of the trends.

trump-spanks-kelly

spanked-by-hitler

Owning, Spanking, and Tickling Women

Jim at http://blog.jim.com recently wrote an ignorant, deceitful, and completely bullshit article about 9/11. The commenters suggested that someone put him up to it. It’s likely a fair assumption he’s lying because he has to – he’s clearly not stupid enough to believe any of it.

But Jim has some things very right, especially on women. He writes constantly about spanking women, even beating women, and the nature of women and “Pauline marriage” – i.e., the Christian ideal of marriage that was commonplace until maybe 75 years ago.

I can’t help but be partial to a man who understands wife spanking as well as he does – and nothing is funnier to me than reading the comments of men shocked – SHOCKED I tell you – that a man would ever spank his wife, or otherwise dominate her in any way.

Cutting?

Cutting

We brand cattle and otherwise mark our property, and if you won’t brand your woman, say, tattoo your name on her ass, she’s like to do something awful like cutting herself. Don’t people realize that regular maintenance spankings take care of this? If they don’t get it in real life, they will read 50 Shades of Grey and Twilight and fantasize about it, or make up pornographic Fraternity Rape fantasies like that woman that Rolling Stone wrote about.

I remember the first time a girl told me she was going to kill herself because I never fucked her. We made out a lot, but never went all the way, for various reasons. So after I stopped paying much attention to her, she called me up one night and told me she had swallowed a bunch of pills because she couldn’t live anymore. I had to call her mom, who of course rushed her to the hospital. Trust me – it was a downer.

Then there was the virgin who after a few months of rogering in the back of her daddy’s SUV, told me what she really wanted was for me to tie her up, blindfolded, and rape her. Look folks – she came from a loving family with a doting step-dad (hmm… well she had never met her biological father. Um, never mind.) She was well-adjusted. My parents loved her and wanted us to get married. She was 16 – and at 16 she was already fantasizing about handcuffs and blindfolds. Sure, I did it, but my heart wasn’t in it – I just didn’t get it.

Another girlfriend – who was literally a sex machine that wanted to do it multiple times a day – she would push and push and push until I grabbed her and held her down and raped her – which usually ended with her smiling and humming to herself as she made us dinner afterwards. I may have had all sorts of second-thoughts and complicated emotional reactions about how I treated her, but she sure as hell didn’t. That relationship ended when I stopped – I just didn’t have the energy into dominating her all the time, and so she basicall wandered off. I was pissed, but instead of dragging her by the hair back to my place, I just sort of started ignoring her and we just sort of drifted apart. The after-break-up sex lasted a few more months but the spell had been broken.

Then there was the waitress who matter of factly told me to put my hands around her throat and stop her from breathing when I was fucking her. Not a lot, just a little. She didn’t want me to kill her or anything. She just needed to be immobilized to the point where she couldn’t even breathe, and that was enough to make her orgasm.

And spanking? Good lord. That even barely counts as kinky. That’s just run of the mill routine. Hair pulling? Holding her wrists down? They show stuff like that on prime-time television, it’s so commonplace.

I – of course – was writing about this stuff since before this blog, and it was a regular feature on this blog since the beginning, and I used to get hassled by the “BDSM community” for pointing out how politically incorrect – not to mention anti-feminist – this stuff really is. It points to an impulse, one that comes from millions of years of evolution, that both hard core feminists – and fake “Christian” Male Church Ladies want to pretend doesn’t exist.

50 Shades, of course, but back ten years ago it was “Secretary” – oh, man, you should have seen the ink spilled about that movie. It was hugely popular among the Fashionable Liberal Women set who watches indie films, but it was just so “problematic” they had to write about it over, and over, and over again.

Go back even more and it’s the Story of O. The literary types were adamant it was written by a man, but of course it was written by a woman – ONLY a woman could have written the story of O.

Hitting your woman with a stick

Jim may sometimes exaggerate to make a point, but the point remains. Women aren’t men. They don’t think like men, they don’t fuck like men, they don’t react the way men do. And most men don’t understand them.

The only time I ever lost a woman was because I *didn’t* rough her up, I *didn’t* take ownership, I *didn’t* claim her as my property. Women don’t want a boyfriend or a fuck buddy, they want an owner. Sure – lots of women would rather be owned by her boss rather than her husband, but Boss and Secretary is basically their second most common sexual fantasy, just after “kidnapped by a rival gang/warrior, and enslaved in the harem of a slightly but not too exotic foreign chief, where she fucks/births her way to the top of the harem.

Jim’s also right about race, which makes his cucking over 9/11 so much more disappointing, but I guess you can’t win them all.

its-funny-how-things-change-with-time-i-used-to-hate-taking-naps-and-getting-spanked-af8f9

Mind Control Notes 1

I’ve been reading ANolen’s “Systems of Control” articles.

So one time I’m hanging out with this dude Kurt and his girlfriend and I’m like, is there anything to this “magic” stuff? Or, like, “the occult?” Because I’ve never believed any of it, nor its nice “New Agey” happiness and rainbows version either.

So Kurt says, “yeah.” He takes this strap/handle from a bike bag or something, you know a flat piece of cloth, and he says “hold out your hands.” So I do. He wraps the strap around my hands, gives the other end to his woman, and says, “now you’re her slave.”

Immediately, I became enlightened.

Anyway, I had read a tiny bit of Crowley and the like early on and simply dismissed it as a bunch of mumbo-jumbo, but I always knew or suspected that there was something under the surface to it. A while back I read that Crowley was MI6 and I though maybe his “ceremonial magic” had something to do with his intelligence work. I had also read that John Dee was British intel and the origin of the “007” moniker, so I figured his “Angelic language” was essentially early forms of codes and encryption and “contacting your guardian angel” meant “getting in touch with your handler” in some way. I’m guessing there is both more and less than meets the eye, depending on how you look at it.

got_one_that_can_seeApparently a lot of people have read E. Michael Jones and have been discussing his various concepts but I was utterly surprised he discusses things like the Illuminati.

My working hypothesis, especially since I discovered ANolen, roughly sketches the history like this: you have the Jesuits, Masons, Illuminatis etc., who develop psychological profiles of the people that confess to them, and share those profiles up the hierarchy. “Mind control” has been somewhat of a folk art based on various tactics to manipulate people based on both the information in their profile and their “type” of personality.

There’s always been an instinct to systematize the “types” of people, you see it in astrology and fortune telling, and in folk sayings like “Tuesday’s Child.” Then there are the pseudo-scientific versions like Freud and Meyers-Briggs. Hubbard’s early “Dianetics” stuff was a particularly low-rent version of pseudo-psychology he used to build his cult, but an “e-meter” probably wowed a lot of people back then.

Don’t make fun of the Scientologists for putting too much stock in their e-meter. I would like to point out that virtually all Americans spend hours staring into an electric box with blinking lights and believe it’s “real” – that’s “mind control” folks.

You see this sort of thing developing from a folk art to more scientific rigor with Bernays. With broadcasting, the amount of data they could get in and out scaled up considerably.

The “systems of control” developed into … some online ad network asking me if I want to meet foreign ladies.

It’s a handler’s advertiser’s wet dream – you’ll be a profiled consumer since birth. The ultimate “system of control” is global capitalism, money, the international network of central banks and the militaries backing them up, giving the consumer what they want which is what you told them to want.

But back in the days of Crowley and L. Ron, and before the computer revolution made mass SIGINT and data-crunching trivial both for the NSA and the private sector, the IC did it the old fashioned way. Befriending rich and important people, and usable disposable people, and manipulating them into doing what they wanted.

There’s another Hubbard that has long been overlooked in this history, Alfred Matthew Hubbard.

Hubbard introduced more than 6,000 people to LSD, including scientists, politicians, intelligence officials, diplomats, and church figures.

I wondered if “Alfred Matthew Hubbard” is simply a character meant to distance the more famous L. Ron Hubbard from an early part of his career, or perhaps a relative, but I never looked up the dates.

Hubbard used to sell a Christian themed version that later demphasized Christianity for a more general Utopia-like cult. He was going to bring world peace and the like. I’m guessing that back during the Space Race some crackpot had the idea of staging a “UFO invasion.” There were various UFO cults that functioned as a more “scientific” religion.

Here’s how I would have done it back in the 1950s. You find some dupe, dose him with LSD, then he interacts with various people in costumes – “the aliens.” Imagine how powerful of a “mind control” effect that would have had on an average person back in 1950s, back when USA and Russia are in a race to build a Moon Base and goofy alien movies were all the rage.

http://anolen.com/2015/07/12/elementals-or-soul-hacking/

There are potions which can turn people into monsters. There are ‘magic words’; there are golem and succubae. These things don’t work through Harry-Potter-like bolts of lighting, they seem to have a psychological basis

Sex and drugs make a potent mix! Add in some role playing and, let me tell you, you can program a beta sex kitten. She’ll be crawling around on all fours on a leash and loving every minute of it. I recall that Jack McGeorge used to advertise for a “service-oriented submissive.” You see, it’s only cuckolding if you love her and get off on watching her. Otherwise it’s just pimping, or “handling” as the case may be.

In the Eyes Wide Shut orgy scene, the Red Priest sends the women out to particular men.

Every magician knows that props are just that – props. When we tame animals, we use physical restraints, collars and leashes. When we tame women, we sometimes use restraints, collars and leashes but mostly that’s just costumes and role playing to get her off.

The best restraint is, of course, being her source of money. If she’s a party girl you can send her to seduce chumps. This will actually enhance your status to her, you are the Big Daddy and the guys she’s seducing are the chumps.

You can do amazing things with a party gal from 18-28.

For low ranking dudes, you just need some hot thing that likes to drink and party to spend a month or so hanging out. For high ranking men, you strategically send in your daughters to, quite literally, steal the precious bodily fluid of their sons.

Now when you want to do handling that is above an individual level, that’s when you are building a cult.

Wilhelm Reich wrote quite a bit about sex. When some of the old fashioned Communists would write to him complaining that the gals in the Young Communist League were “going from boy to boy” he said, “so what? Let her go from boy to boy.” She’s in control of her own body, she has scientific birth control, and she wants to try out a few different men before she settles down.

Of course, women are just as easy to manipulate as men. She’s hypergamous, which means the higher ranking boys in the mixed-gender Young Communist League are going to get a lot of female attention while the lower ranking dudes won’t, “rank” of course being a bit more subtle than just whatever you’re wearing on your collar.

So, you see, you don’t manipulate people one at a time and you don’t micro-manage people. It’s more like herding animals. You simply put groups of young men and young women together in an environment you control and let nature take its course. In some sense, they are “making their own choices” but of course it’s like choosing option A or option B. That is one reason why people are so picky about where their daughter goes to high school and college – and should probably be a lot more concerned with where their son goes to high school and college too.

At the end of the day, the best form of “mind control” is simply controlling the culture. You can give people plenty of liberty and they will still do what you want. The trick is giving someone the goal and letting them figure out how to attain the goal himself.

… I N C E P T I O N …

Whassssuuuup?

Why They Hate 50 Shades Of Grey

Mr. Grey: “I could hold you to some impossibly high ideal, like Angel Clare, or I could debase you completely, like Alec d’Urberville.”

Anastasia: “Well, if there’s only two options, I take debasement.”

The film version of 50 Shades of Grey came out this weekend, and the media, online and off, is in full hate mode. Full disclosure: I’ve never read it. But my lady friend did, and her opinion was the typical one: poorly written and kind of goofy. I think she was upset it wasn’t really racy enough. For all of the brouhaha about the BDSM, apparently Mr. Grey didn’t even spank Ana all that much.

submissivewoman

On reddit’s conspiracy section, someone asked: why all this hate toward some silly romance novel? The hate and “controversy” over what amounts to “Wuthering Heights with spanking” is somewhat astounding. I realize some in the White Nationalist crowd get their klan robes in a bunch over anything sexual that isn’t married missionary position. Forget the queers and the sluts – even a husband tying up his wife is “degenerate” and caused by “jew porn” and yet another sign of the Total Collapse Of Western Society And Christendom. So, our friends over at the Daily Stormer have added BDSM to their long list of “degeneracy” along with the homos and sluts and miscegenators.

The manosphere types, especially the Christians, often mention that feminism has infected even the right wing conservatives and the Church. White men are “White Knights” – especially the older generation – and automatically cater to whatever women want, acting like “manginas.”

I would posit it’s all of a piece. Sure, traditional conservatives and Christians are not “feminist” in the cultural Marxist sense of the word; believing that women and men are separate “social classes” engaged in the “class struggle” of oppressors vs. the oppressed. But there is a wide and deep habit of “White Knighting” in traditionalist circles – and it is absolutely related to the bizarre hatred toward 50 Shades of Grey – a silly piece of erotica with some spanking and bondage, after all.

Not only does feminism “shame” male sexuality – we’re all rapists, wife beaters and we “objectify” women’s bodies, after all – but so does conservatism and modern Christianity. For the right-wingers, feminists are correct that men are deeply afraid of women’s sexuality. But it’s for a good reason.

If men really knew what turns women on, civilization would come to a halt, because so much of civilization is based on chivalry and wanting to believe that women tend toward monogamy and are attracted to “good men.”

They are not. Quite the opposite, in fact.

When men discuss their own sexuality, they quite often focus on how shallow it is – a nice pair of tits and a round ass. Men will go on and on about how they will “fuck anything that moves” and how men are all “sluts.” But these same men project this quite Victorian notion onto women. You see this in the worst parts of the manosphere, who really do believe – and the feminists have them correctly pegged here – that women want to “trade sex for resources.” The man provides the “resources” and the women pay for it with sex – which the man wants, and the women don’t, really.

Then, when these manosphere men look at how women actually behave – quite the opposite of their Victorian fantasy – they get angry and resentful. They drag the women down from that pedestal they placed her on and disparage her as a “hypergamous slut.”

I feel for women, I really do, because they are only allowed to be a Madonna, or a Whore. There’s never anything in between.

nude-girl-in-heavy-bondage-feature-600x355

Of course, the feminists hate 50 Shades of Grey because Ana is submissive and Mr. Grey is dominant. It’s essentially a Patriarchal Rape Fantasy, and feminists hate women’s sexuality even more than Conservative men do. The same feminists that hate the idea of 50 Shades would be praising a similar novel up and down if the roles were reversed. If it was a high powered woman CEO Dominatrix that loves to spank young studly pool boys, the feminists would love it (even though it would leave them drier than the Sahara Desert.) But the fact the novel essentially portrays traditional roles – the man is powerful, the woman is submissive – they hate it.

You will find the worst hate coming from the uber-feminist “BDSM Community.” The “BDSM Community” has done nothing but shriek about 50 Shades of Grey, saying it’s not “real BDSM” – they didn’t even use s safe word!!! – and that it’s really just abuse. The BDSM community keeps hating on the “50 Shaders” – young women interested in BDSM because of reading the novel, and how they “totally have the wrong idea.” Just like hipsters upset that the mainstream has finally caught on to some underground band, the “BDSM Community” feels like it’s losing it’s monopoly on what “real BDSM is” and love nothing more than to morally posture about how everyone else is doing it “wrong.”

Believe me, the “BDSM Community” is more obnoxious than the worst sorts of “Social Justice Warriors” blathering on about “transphobia” and “tolerance for Otherkin.”

Of course, the humorless conservatives, including Christians, are not only afraid of their own penises, but doubly afraid of vaginas, apparently. Bondage? That’s “degenerate!” “Spanking? Only an evil, sick man would be rough with a woman! Sex is supposed to be about tender caresses and the missionary position. My wife in an innocent angel, why, she doesn’t get turned on ever, except when I rub her feet on date night! My daughter is totally chaste and she tells all those nasty boys “no” – she would never purposefully and with malice aforethought seduce a man – especially not an older man! That’s just sick!”

To any man who actually has experience with women, these guys are jokes. I remember these fathers well, from high school and college. They “trusted” their daughters, so no problem her taking the car and meeting up with Sleazy Hipster Boyfriend for some good, clean teenage fun.

Like bowling or watching a movie, you know. Certainly not blowjobs in the car, threesomes and all sorts of raunchy sex. Only “those kinds of girls” do that – “not my wife and daughter.”

You have to laugh.

Women are sexually aroused by power. It doesn’t make any difference whether the man with the power is “good” or “evil” – in fact, I suspect women have an instinct toward “evil men” frankly. Women are sexually aroused by being overwhelmed by that power, to submitting to that power – willingly, or even hotter, unwillingly.

The key part of the Rape Fantasy is that the woman is so desirable that the man, powerful though he is, is in fact, overpowered by her – by his desire for her.

Feminism makes women deeply ashamed of their own sexuality, and that is why the “BDSM Community” was invented. Gals want what they want sexually, so the “BDSM Community” does its best to contain their submissive natures. That is why there is all the obsession with “safe words” and “consent” and “role play.” It has to be “just playing,” “just role play,” and “verbally consented to without duress.”

To feminists, a woman consenting to be tied up and flogged at a sex club is fine – but a wife obeying her husband; that’s sexist misogyny. A woman who is a “slave” in the “BDSM Community” can be collared and made to eat dogfood – that’s just a “kink.” But a girl putting out for her boyfriend to keep him happy – that’s “date rape.”

Conservatives are right, in a sense. Because of women’s hypergamous nature, unleashed female sexuality will destroy a civilization. Monogamy exists for a reason, patriarchy exists for a reason. Patriarchy makes men invest in children, and monogamy is how men are assured that the children are his. Without monogamy and without patriarchy, men have no incentive to invest in the future, in the society, in the tribe. Without Patriarchy and Monogamy, there is no civilization.

woman-in-fishnets-spanking-498x332

Women are hypergamous, and polygamy is the nature state of humans. Women have little problem sharing a high status man with other women. The wives of wealthy and desirable men have been looking the other way at their husband’s affairs since forever – it’s the natural state of things. Most women would rather put up with cheating from a handsome, wealthy man than be married to a faithful but poor schlub.

The reason we have monogamy is because, left to their own devices, women would share the top 50% of men, and the bottom 50% of men would have no women at all.

Yet, for a society to actually work, you need the bottom half of men. It’s those “betas” that make the trains run on time, not to mention kill the ragheads that are living on top of our oil.

Since reliable, scientific birth control was invented, women have been able to pursue a “double strategy” – the so called “alpha fucks and beta bucks.” By postponing marriage, children, and family formation, women have been able to get sex from men “out of their league” while young, but still be able to find a caring man “in her league” for marriage. Men who object to their wives previous promiscuity are simply shamed as “insecure” and the whole point of giving out free condoms in high school is to make sure that there are no virgins left by the time boys and girls are of marriageable age.

That’s by design, because men might choose the virgins for marriage, thus incentivize women to remain chaste.

This worked for 50 years, until the internet destroyed the consensus, like it has the consensus on so many things. The “manosphere” has sort of let the cat out of the bag. The numbers don’t lie – marriage is a dead institution. If present trends continue – and they almost certainly will – most people will never marry. Fertility will continue to drop like a rock, and more and more men will simply “opt out” of society.

It’s laughable to read the complaints of pseudo-feminist women wondering where all the chivalry has gone. Chances are, women aren’t even going to be taken out on proper dates anymore. For the average men, women have virtually nothing to offer him – but sex. As the days of a wife, a mother to your children, and an exclusive lover are gone, what do women have that men need? Just the sex, that’s it.

You can see the results of this with the increasingly crass attitudes of men toward women, and vice-versa. Many advanced cultures are going through this phenomenon, Japan being a noticeable example, with their “herbivore men” who don’t bother chasing women, never get married, and simply drop out of the culture. They do not contribute to the culture except in the most minimal way, as consumers.

The same thing is happening in the USA, although mass non-white immigration and multi-culturalism obscures the effects somewhat. The bottom is dropping out of the White middle class, and it dropped out of the White working class 30 years ago – exactly at the time when the Sexual Revolution was finally mainstreamed.

This is not a coincidence.

Feminists and Conservative both hate 50 Shades for the same basic reason: it’s an accurate account of women’s sexuality. Feminists hate it because it reminds them that women want “the wrong thing.” Women are supposed to want an “equal relationship with a peer who respects her as a person.” But women tend to actually go for men who are higher status than her, and if he’s “emotionally unavailable” she just wants him more. Conservatives are also upset that women want “the wrong thing.” Women are supposed to want a Good Conservative Christian – you know, like them. Instead, women go for the Bad Men, even men who are “abusive” and they generally don’t get wet for the husband that reads the Bible to her before he gently fucks her in the missionary position. Worse for the conservatives, women are not particularly interested in monogamy. They want one man – at a time – but are always looking for the opportunity to “trade up” and while young, they are in no hurry to marry the Beta Boy Next Door that’s “in her league” – not when she still has access to Studly Hockey Players to gang-bang after practice.

That is where all this hate for a silly romance novel with some bondage and spanking comes from. It’s not about the bondage and spanking.

It’s about power.

That’s why they call it “Power Exchange.”

The Switch: Taking Up The Whip Part One

So I just chanced onto a blog by some MSNBC-tard “progressive,” reasonablyliberal, and made a throw away post about his support for “immigration reform.” I said essentially it shows that he’s not “progressive” at all, merely anti-white. The “immigrants” he wants to import to America are the opposite of “progressive” – they are peoples that have created cultures based around the opposite of “progressive” values – no freedom of speech, a low status for women, fanatically “homophobic.” Yet these progressive *cheer* the idea of America becoming less white, even though it will make America less “progressive.”

How to explain this is very simple and something most White Nationalists know – they are not “progressive” – they are simply anti-white.

Of course, the MSNBC-tard assumed that I must be a Republican, that I must be a conservative, and oddly accused me of voting for Bush because I opposed Obama’s war-mongering. To the MSNBC-tards of the world, anyone who isn’t on their side just *MUST* be a FOX-tard, they must be some Bible-thumping, homo-hating “racist” “sexist” conservative. Of course, the MSNBC-tards are never quite sure if their opponents are toothless hillybilly Ku-Klux-Klansman or wealthy CEOs lighting their cigars with hundred dollar bill appropriated from the working class.

So the MSNBC-tard took a look at my blog trying to sniff out some “racism” “sexism” and “homophobia” – never quite sure what the settle on, but what he did finally settle on is very, very revealing. I’m guessing he read some of the many entries about the CIA and then proceeded to describe how evil the Republicans are due to the Abu Ghraib torture scandal, and then assumed I must approve of this.

In fact, he seemed to have noticed a lot of the BDSM-themed stories, so assumed that I am a “pervert” – into that kinky sex shit – so I probably get off on Abu Ghraib. In that sense, he’s just like LibertyLamp, the “anti-fascist” who basically called me a “faggot” and compared me to a transsexual – in other words, the “anti-hate activist” LibertyLamp used homophobia, transphobia … and MISOGYNY – to attack me.

The reason these types find “hate” everywhere is simply because *they are motivated by hate* – pure, raw hatred.

ReasonablyLiberal’s references to Abu Ghraib were odd, of course, because anyone who has read this blog for any length of time has noticed that I have talked about Abu Ghraib quite a bit, along with many many articles detailing the CIA’s long history of horrific human rights abuses. But it is no surprise – not a surprise at all – that he tried to label me as a supporter of torture because of the 50 Shades of Grey style sex stories. Just like LibertyLamp’s homophobic, transphobic, and misogynists slurs against me reveal something about herself, so ReasonablyLiberal’s desperate attempts to paint me as a hater reveals something about himself.

What this all boils down to – all these issues – is that of *power* – who has it and what they do with it. I’ve written many, many times about feminism and how intimately related feminism is to BDSM, how women who are attracted to feminism are very often into some very hard-core BDSM. White Nationalists also need to realize that their “progressive” opponents pose as morally superior because they believe – or pretend to believe – that they are powerless, that the people in America who have power are Whites. White have “privilege” because they are powerful. Blacks and Mestizos are “righteous” because they are powerless.

This is simply slave-morality as described by Nietzsche, of course. As Mindweapon once said, Liberalism is just Christianity with AIDS, once Christianity is stripped of the spiritual, once the Beatitudes – blessed are the meek, blessed are the poor – are taken out of their religious context and secularized, they become just assertions of moral superiority based on weakness.

This leads to the hilarious pretension that Ashkenazi Jews – a white skinned, ethno-centrist ethnic group that happens to be the wealthiest and most powerful white skinned group in America – are actually “oppressed.” Who is oppressing Jews – the Jews that dominate the media, are well entrenched in Wall Street, have well funded political lobbies like the SPLC and the ADL – who could possibly oppress these people, the most powerful – not to mention perceived to be white – group in America?

Why, neo-Nazis of course. But where are these “neo-Nazis?”

They don’t actually exist. Other than some internet trolls on websites like 4Chan or the Daily Stormer – neo-Nazis DO NOT EXIST.

Just as Steve Sailer said, the only thing that holds the “progressive” coalition together is “KKK-razy glue” – they have to pretend that the Evil White Oppressors – KKK-Nazis – exist so they can all band together and fight against them. When it becomes clear that the KKK and neo-Nazis DO NOT EXIST, all of a sudden the anti-white coalition falls apart.

Progressives support gay marriage – yet Blacks, the Democrat party’s strongest voting block – is hilariously “homophobic.” “Gay” “marriage” was defeated in California because of the black vote. Progressives support “women’s rights” – yet the culture of Mestizos is hilariously patriarchal and sexist – the exact opposite of feminism. It’s a source of pure comedy now to read feminists on twitter, as the uber-White lesbian folk singers of the Lilith Fair set are attacked as “racist” by Black Feminists (#solidarityisforwhitewomen.) “Progressives” believe Jews to be a Holy Victim class, yet the Catholic Mestizos they want to replace white people with are actually, superstitiously, anti-semitic, and American Jews, far from being victims, are racist oppressors who fund and provide political cover as the Israelis ethnically cleanse the Palestinians.

Without the ghost of not-actually-existing KKK-Nazis, the whole “progressive” coalition falls apart, because they don’t have any enemies, they are not, in fact, victims at all, they *are the ruling class they oppose.* One only has to remember the cries of “anti-semitism” over Occupy Wall Street – Occupy Wall Street, a movement *started by progressive Jews* against the “1%” accidentally revealed a truth you’re never supposed to notice, the “1%” that owns Wall Street – they are Jewish progressives.

THEY ARE THE RULING CLASS.

Now, what does this have to do with BDSM and spanking? Quite a bit, actually. BDSM is all about “power” and they even call it “power exchange.”

And politics is about power.

A while back the DailyStormer did a very interesting article about Holocaust films, and how Holocaust mythology has often – almost always – included an element of BDSM. The earliest Holocaust novels were barely this side of porn – one remembers the hilarious “masturbation machines” that a Jew claimed the Nazis used on him. In Israel, BDSM-themed Holocaust porn is a huge industry, imagery of Jewish men tied up and flogged by Nazi Dominatrixes – the She-Wolf of the SS.

ilsa-she-wolf

The film “Salo” – essentially a homosexual porn film – was sold as “art” because it was a “deconstruction” of “fascist sexuality.” The “need to dominate” was integral to the “Nazi character” and Germans, Europeans in general, and Catholics – in other words, anyone who opposed Communism – were a bunch of “degenerate perverts” that were driven by their “perverted sexual kink.” The modern film Pan’s Labyrinth is a non-pornographic version of the same thing, the Nazis in that case being replaced by Franco’s Fascists, the victims Spanish Republicans – and Jews, of course. Of course, the film shows the Fascist character sexually aroused by torturing his victims.

Now, in case you think I’m stretching the analogy, not too long ago professional anti-White Jew Tim Wise said that it was time for the “former slaves” to take power, and he even used a very telling illustration. He said it was time for the traditionally “oppressed” to “take up the whip” against their former “oppressors.”

In BDSM, that’s called “The Switch” and if you will permit me just a bit of leeway, you will find that understanding this dynamic reveals quite a bit about the nature of anti-whites. In this case, the Blacks, Mestizoes, and Asians are incidental, their anti-whiteness is simply ethnocentrism and racist hate. Blacks, Mestizoes, and Asians are simply normal, ethnocentric people.

The anti-Whites in question are the Ashkenazi Jews and White “ethno-masoscists” and it is those anti-Whites that this analysis is about.

I’m a mod on a section of Reddit called “Break Feminazis,” which is described as a “fantasy BDSM themed subreddit about Sexist Misogynists fighting a Gender War against Feminists, defeating them and turning them into sex slaves.” It’s pretty hokey and the porn imagery is kind of disgusting to me personally, but the narratives are often half-sexy and half-funny, and I participate because every once in a while we get a “live one.”

The “live one” is usually some young “feminist” woman who goes off about the horrible evil misogynists who make a fetish out of humiliating feminists. It doesn’t take too long for them to admit that, while yes, they do find these BDSM stories erotic as hell – they quite often masturbate to them – they like to add an ending. At the end of the hot sex fantasy where they are forced into humiliating sexual submission, they “turn the tables” on the Sexist Misogynists and “take up the whip,” as it were, against their former oppressors.

TO BE CONTINUED

holocaust-porn

A disclaimer: there are a number of people – men and women – in the White Nationalist movement obsessed with “sexual degeneracy,” pornography, and have a real hang up about BDSM. The women who claim they are disgusted by BDSM are pretty much the same as men who go on long tirades about “fags” – someone is protesting too much. The regular men, married husbands, who rant about 50 Shades of Grey being degenerate are almost certainly in denial about their own wives’ sexuality. I know this, because I’m quite familiar with the kind of women who don’t “get it” at home – so they go to professional Doms who will, in fact, give it to them.

It’s probably best if you don’t ask how I know, just take my word for it.

kkk-whipping

Why Women Love Me But Hate You

So Little Miss Fuck and Run – 24 years old, by the way – well she tells me she’s reading 50 Shades of Grey. So, of course, she wants to try it. Ten minutes later, I had her hands tied to her bedposts, she’s blindfolded and I’m smacking her ass really, really hard.

Good lord is was *so fucking hot* for both of us.

A year later, rinse and repeat with a new one – Yoga Ass. She liked me so much she had my baby.

See, you beta boys don’t get it. You think it’s weird and kinky – you think it’s some porn thing, that if you watch a bunch of porn, you’ll start to like flogging women.

But don’t worry, that will never happen. You are either born with it, or you are not. The fact you are “betas” and women despise you – it is precisely because you don’t have a taste for controlling women and being rough with them. Women *love it* – most of them. All of them, I’m convinced. Blindfolds, restraints, spanking, hair pulling – they love it. To them, it’s just a good night. But you betas – you boys that are shy around women or whatever – eh, well, somebody has to do all the work while us “alphas” fuck your women.

Now, I’m older, I’m not the young slutty stud I used to be, but the story of one year of my life is far more interesting than the story of your entire life.

They call it “power exchange” and it is when you have all the power, and the woman has no power. She’s literally hog tied, unable to move. You can do anything you want to her. Women, see, they love the suspense, they tie themselves in knots (!) thinking, anticipating what awful, horrible things her Alpha Sadist is going to do to her. Will it hurt? Probably. Will it be humiliating? Certainly. And it will make her come harder than she ever has, and when she is in bed with her Beta, it will give her something to fantasize about.

So their little yelps of pain, the involuntary jerks, the way their little butt muscles tense up, the way they twist around on their toes – fuck fuck fuck it makes me fucking hard. Can’t help it. I don’t know why, it just is.

See, guys like us, we’re really just doing a public service. You should like, pay us.

See, it used to be a secret. “Our little secret” we called it. You could tell the gals that were into it, because they would usually signal it someway. Those were the ones that knew what they were. Many gals need to be introduced to it, and sure they are scared at first, but that just adds to the hotness.

Now, the dim-witted Church Ladies will scream about “jew porn” but the reality is, they like it too, they just like to keep up appearances.

So 50 Shades brought it all out of the closet. You’ll notice that virtually every woman read it. Even though it is supposedly terribly written, they still bought it. It’s a massive bestseller.

I have to laugh at the Nazitards at places like Daily Stormer, full of betas whining about how women are sluts – that’s just jealousy. Women are sluts – for guys like me – and they are chaste virgins for guys like you. See how that works? The Nazitards actually wrote an anti-50 Shades article, a bunch of betas posing as “family values” types wanking it to stories of white sluts they wish they could have. Lulz.

I’ve never even had a “third date” – in fact, I’ve barely had a second date. Because I’m the “bad boy.” Frankly, it’s s burden, but someone has to do it. You certainly aren’t giving your woman what she wants.

So, I will.

You’re welcome.

Forgetting Holly

Never.

What do you think I am, some sort of monster?

happy-sub

Hey, what’s the point of this? Oh hey
What’s your favorite song? Maybe we could hum along

Hey, maybe just a smile, oh hey, did you know
That I can dance? Could we talk for awhile?

I think you’re smart, you sweet thing
Tell me your name, I’m dying here

Got you where I want you
Got you where I want you

easy-a-1

heart-cuffs