By the 1990s, the AIDS scare was over and everyone realized that the plague was confined to male homosexuals, needle drugs, and Africans. The sexual chill of the 1980s was over: the popular culture of film and music had continued to get more and more explicit – some would say “degenerate” – even while people’s actual behavior had become puritanical. The social shift was centered around the mainstreaming of condoms. The official story was that teenagers were going to have sex anyway so they should use condoms to avoid AIDS and pregnancy.
While the first sexual revolution of the 1960s still had double standards and jealousy, the second sexual revolution had shifted. If everyone was promiscuous, then no one was a “slut.” Since no one was getting married or having children any time soon, teenage relationships were by nature temporary and among peers partners were swapped: Jane dated Billy for a while, then Jane hooked up with Billy’s friend Mike while Jane’s friend Sally started dating Billy. The timeline simply got shorter and the number of partners increased.
So it was only a matter of time until the timeline of the relationships got shorter and the partner swapping more immediate. High school parties where couples would disappear into a bedroom simply evolved into high school parties where more than one couple would be in the bedroom, or on the same bed. Or where there weren’t couples as much as groups.
Still, there were some lines that were simply not crossed, at least in the 1990s middle to upper middle class Washington DC suburbs of the 1990s. The rules were essentially non-negotiable:
1. No coloreds. Maybe a half Korean girl would be in the mix occasionally, but like an Abercrombie and Fitch catalog, this was a very White affair. Washington DC, even in the 1990s, was most certainly a racially diverse area, but integrated schools had not led to integrated social circles, and rarely intimacy. All throughout the 1980s Black and White couples were lauded by the media (OJ & Nicole) and the United Colors of Bennetton had spent a decade trying to push a slightly less sexual version of the Abercrombie and Fitch orgy aesthetic, but to no avail.
2. No fags. Male homosexuality was simply not tolerated. This was an era when gays were “coming out of the closet” and TV shows like Friends made it clear that “homophobia” was uncool. Nevertheless, teenage boys, even if they talked the talk, were simply not going to walk the walk. They may not have been going around queer bashing but neither were they going to invited suspected gays, much less out gays, to their parties. And the occasional friend, suspected or known to be gay, that was invited to a social party were simply never invited to the after parties.
Of course “bi-curious” girls were not even considered “lesbian,” merely a form of exhibitionist foreplay.
3. No rape. This was the era of third wave feminism. It was not cool to do something to a girl who was passed out – that passed out girl was your friend. It simply was not considered manly and a rough form of “consent” was expected. Of course “peer pressure” wasn’t considered “coercion” and it would be another decade before concepts like “rape culture” would be popularized – quite possibly precisely because a decade or so of these attitudes created a backlash, and the teenage girls who organized these parties had to regain some plausible deniability.
4. No jealousy. Of course people did get jealous, but no one owned anyone and when people did pair off and form serious couples, they simply didn’t go to the parties anymore. This was in a sense, “sexual utopia in power” and F. Roger Devlin might say. Women – really, girls – were the organizers here. They decided which boys to invite and it was their consent that powered the whole culture.
The style was rave, baby doll dresses and neo-bohemian. The soundtrack was electronic dance music and alternative rock. The drugs were alcohol, marijuana, and MDMA. (LSD and mushrooms were quite often the initiation into the scene, but those aren’t party drugs.)
No one knew anything about “BDSM” or even what it meant, the blindfolds and bondage were simply party favors, a natural development. There was always a certain “switch” dynamic – both boys and girls could be the one being blindfolded and “worked,” but the few times when an actual male submissive would want some sort of humiliation play, it would skeeve the girls out; he would be labeled a “creep” and no longer invited to the parties.
The age to play? 16.
Of course, as always, standards began to slip after the first generation. LGBT became more militant. Consent became blurry. Jealousy, always present, became more pronounced as “experimentation” morphed into “lifestyle” and the window of opportunity to leave it all behind got smaller. It you’re in the scene from 16-26, you’ve had a decade of experience at temporary “relationships” and zero experience with keeping anything permanent. The color line started to blur, which ruined the entire concept of consent, as consent is a cultural norm, shared among those with the same race and culture. Little sisters were not rebelling against the sexual chill of the 1980s as their older sisters had done, thus had a “starting point” that was much further along than their older siblings.
The impact of internet pornography started to be felt. Before, the parties, the social scene, WAS the initiation – it WAS the porn. Once hard core internet pornography went mainstream, boys – and girls – already had expectations, and the expectations were no longer set by peers in their own social circles, but by professional pornographers and pimps from Los Angeles, always eager to “segment” a market in order to micro-market to fetishes with pin point accuracy.
There’s all the difference in the world between BEING the product, and watching a product being advertised.
What finally killed it off was camera phones and social media. Rumors can be denied, video evidence broadcast instantly to thousands could not.
As the Unabomber Ted Kazinsky might say, technology affects everything and society gets further and further away from the natural order. Only an industrial society would postpone marriage and family formation long past a biologically appropriate age in order to spend the youth’s most productive years learning to run the machines and push the paperwork. Feeding the machine becomes more important that reproducing the race; the machines become more important than the biology. So society will go back and forth between repression and degeneracy as long as it suppresses biology.
The Onion: Teen Wastes Prime Childbearing Years Going To High School
When I started this blog, the manosphere anti-feminist stuff was just starting out and there was a rather large faction of the White Nationalist movement that were “white knights” and loud mouthy feminists who just happened to not like blacks and browns. 50 Shades of Grey had become a phenomenon, and manosphere writers like Heartiste were pushing pro-white ideas among young white men.
I didn’t start off as a manosphere writer but my first few article on the topic received huge hits from reddit subs like /r/TheRedPill and they even featured me on the “male feminist” site Manboobz.com. Plus I attracted a small but loyal following of bitchy women that loved arguing with me and reading my spanking stories.
But it got kind of boring: manosphere ideas and the “red pill” about women are enlightening when you first understand them, but women are not “broken” and need to be fixed. Evolution made women what they are for good reasons, it’s up to men to understand and adapt, if they want a woman. But too many young men in the manosphere think that they are supposed to “fix” women and the spend all thenir time just whining that women are into the “wrong kind of men.”
Women are so shallow they are into guys who are handsome, have big muscles, and are manly. Unlike men of course, who aren’t so shallow and totally don’t care about looks and bodies, right? Come on.
But now over the last few years, since I’ve started this blog, there are thousands of new white women on the blogs and twitter pushing pro-white memes and “tradwife” type stuff. These are not boys posting “White Women in Wheat Fields” these are women posting pictures of their “1950s Household” style fantasies complete with a traditional “head of household” husband and cute white babies. I’ve discussed the “1950s household” “fetish” before – it’s HUGE in the “BDSM community” – but at the end of the day it isn’t a “fetish” at all, it’s simply what most White women prefer but can’t get.
The White “tradwife” types of course, are still women, so they love social media, posting memes and pictures, and love catfights with anti-white women.
So why bother with the manosphere type stuff anymore? We basically already won. I’m never going to be as good as Heartiste at that sort of thing, and frankly I don’t really want an audience of young incels with a chip on their shoulders because they can’t get a girlfriend.
So now, on Twitter, I made sure to re-tweet all the White Tradwife types posting their segregation 1950s household fantasies and cute white baby pictures. Back during the Hipster Intelligence Agency experiment, my (white) BDSM authoress proved that women are very drawn to this sort of thing, and so women that are openly pro-white should be supported.
“White sharia” is for losers and Jewish trolls like (((Weev))) – we already have our traditional way of dealing with women, and women love it.
Yeah, I get a racist vibe from her. Being from Pennsylvania and knowing how those white people look at you and treat you when you go to their little townships is CRAZY! Pennsylvania as a whole outside of Philadelphia, is a notoriously racist state. Philadelphia has its racists but they are outnumbered here so they keep it under the wraps. Ask any black Penn State student, the further you go out in Pennsylvania the more racists you’ll encounter.
Sometimes she will pretend to be a feminist, but it’s always White Feminism, thus exploits the struggles of Women of Color in the service of White Supremacy. The fact that she is constantly signaling to her racist fan base has been noted elsewhere and she is constantly engaged in “hipster racism.”
Has she ever dated a Person of Color? No. Has she come out strongly against Donald Hitler Trump? No. Even after her many videos have been called out for hipster racism, and worse, she’s never apologized, changed her ways, or done anything to reject her White privilege.
In short, Taylor Swift is both benefiting from her White Privilege and simply using “anti-racism” as a shield. Taylor Swift is the real racist.
She actually is racist does anyone remember when cannoli from fifth harmony racist texts about normani were revealed Taylor swift put herself into the situation to protect cannoli She called up her on call token Seryah and did some forced awkward Instagram photo shoot with Seryah in the middle of her and cannoli. It was so obvious and staged to try and make cannoli look like she likes black people lol I think it may have been bc Taylor is like a big sister to cannoli and she saw that cannoli was a dumb young reckless racist who was getting caught/exposed and as a mentor and aryan leader she had to show her the ropes on how it’s really done.
“Jews are so smart they are better than non-Jews at leading movements that hate them. It’s like they are so annoyed at non-Jews for being incompetent at anti-Semitism so they just do it themselves and then proceed to make the best anti-Jew memes.” — RooshV
“Damn, and I was gambling on the Daily Stormer being the first alt-right outlet to be revealed to be controlled opposition.
I still predict that pipe bomb will drop sometime in the future.” — Larsen Halleck
“It’s like “rape culture”. To prove it, you need a steady supply of rapists. If you can’t find rapists, just accuse random men of rape. To prove “anti-Semitism”, you need anti-Semites. If there are none around, become the anti-Semites yourself.” — RooshV
“While listening to Enoch’s podcast once a while back, I heard him defend Andrew Anglin vehemently enough (against those exact allegations, I believe) that I have no doubt that you are right.” — D. Loomis
“HA! This is fantastic. What’s next? Anti-Semetic Podcaster and inventor of the (((meme))) is married to a jew and might be a jew himself. What’s next? Are we going to find out that billionaire playboy real estate moguls from new York city couldn’t fucking care less about middle class or making anything great again?” — lolknee
No, I doubt Anglin is married to a Jewess – Anglin doesn’t seem the type that has sex with women.
But Anglin’s (((Daily Stormer))) is of course run by Jews – it’s run by “Weev” who is Jewish.
And Anglin’s major financier “Colonel Grub” something or other – the one that raped a white woman…
Well, his white rape victim described him as “not really white.”
If he was black, she would have said “black.”
So “not really white” likely means he’s Middle Eastern.
Putting that in context – that means Israeli.
So the guy who runs the technical side of (((Daily Stormer))) – weev – is a Jew.
And the guy who pays for the entire operation, “Colonel Grub” or whatever, is an Israeli.
It’s a nice scam they are running there.
I’m going to start running the same scam myself. I’m going to start a blog, something like “The Real Fash.”
I’m going to post the most over-the-top hilarious (((Hollywood Nazi))) gimmickry, you know, REAL HARD CORE shit. Plenty of faggoty anime shit (I’ll need to find someone to help me learn about that anime shit as I’m not a faggot who actually watches that garbage.)
I’ll get an NYC Jewess social media expert – like Enoch’s wife – to help me publicize it. I’ve dated a few NYC Jewesses in my time (way better looking than Enoch’s wife – woof!) Maybe just call up an ex-girlfriend, tell her I’m really an “anti-racist” trying to undermine the Evil Trump Alt-Right.
Then, start raking in the shekels from the NEETs that love to circle-jerk to Anime Hitler Cats and Japanese Cartoon Kiddie Porn.
Watch out (((Daily Stormer))) – I already have a few handles on your site. I already troll you as the most “hard core fash” on your own forums, because – hey – it’s easy.
The (((Daily Stormer))) audience are literally the biggest suckers on the internet. I mean, these are the people that fall for Amway scams and pyramid schemes.
Let’s face it – these are NOT the cream of the crop of the Aryan race.
I’ve long wanted to pull such a scam, but I never thought it would be worthwhile.
But considering how EASY it is to pull scams like Anglin and Enoch do – there’s no reason to NOT do it.
Anyone want to help – email me at email@example.com – I’ll cut you in on some shekels.
But mostly for Lulz.
It’s so easy to scam the (((Daily Stormer))) kids – like stealing candy from babies.
If you read Ann Coulter’s latest, Ann Coulter: Tips for Hate Crime Hoaxers you can’t help but see the influence of yours truly.
Liberal girls always seem to be imagining strong, rough, Heathcliff-type white men demanding that they disrobe or become “sex slaves.” (Oddly, Heathcliff keeps doing this in well-trafficked areas in the middle of the day with no witnesses.)
The hijab hoaxer at the University of Michigan described her imaginary Trump-supporting pursuer as white, in his 20s or 30s, with an athletic build, unkempt and intoxicated. He demanded that she remove her hijab. (After a police investigation, she admitted she made it up.)
The alleged hijab victim at University of New Mexico, Leena Aggad, said her hijab was ripped off by “a really buff guy wearing a Trump shirt.” (The attack was serious enough for her to tell the media about it, but not serious enough to report it to campus security, much less the police.)
A 28-year-old black woman, Kara Stevens, claimed three Trump-supporting white men in their 30s approached her in a Safeway parking lot in Hillsboro, Oregon, mentioned Donald Trump — then threatened to turn her into their “sex slave”! (Investigation suspended with no video, no witnesses and no evidence.)
With a little more imagination, these stories could become the new “Fifty Shades of Grey.”
I was, of course, writing “Liberal Girls Ravished By Right Wingers” Rape Porn before it was cool.
In fact, it seems that yours truly may in fact be the original “Alt-Left” – usually defined as the “left wing of the Alt-Right.” Not only does the Official Alt-Left site, AltLeft.com, link this blog, but anyone reading the description of what the “Alt Left” is can recognize this writer’s influence:
[The Alt Left] was always meant to augment the AltRight, not outright oppose it. It was a way to view and examine the affects of multiculturalism and political correctness from a cultural and economically left lens as well as from a secular and futurist perspective rather than the radical traditionalist, socially conservative one that dominates right wing circles. In other words, recognizing the implicit whiteness that underpins the identities of progressive cities like Seattle or Portland, and asserting that it must become explicit to some degree in order for those places to maintain their culture, aesthetic and quality of life. It was to put forth the idea that someone can be pro-white without the albatross of traditionally conservative culture, pre-modern aesthetics, capitalist economics, or widely accepted republican historical dogma.
Going back to nearly the beginning of the old MindWeaponsInRagnarok site, and the original post using the handle “Hipster Racist,” shows that this writer was doing it before anyone else was. We were celebrating the implicit racism of Portlandia since the beginning.
In fact, the entire concept of “hipster racist” was in fact an anti-white talking point gaining serious cultural currency until this writer co-opted it as pro-white, and few anti-white Social Justice Warriors have attempted to wield it seriously since.
Not only that, the original Alt Righter, Richard Spencer, has personally thanked Hipster Racist for inspiring his use of the term “hipster racism” nearly five years ago.
Like the Velvet Underground, I never sold a lot of records – but the people who did buy my records all went on to be rock stars themselves. I didn’t influence the masses, I influenced the elites who then went on to influence the masses.
I’m the Lou Reed of Racists.
What “watermelon” is to black people, “pumpkin” is to white people.