Tag Archives: imperialism

All Men Are Gangsters At Heart

Last time I was in DC I walked around one of the suburbs, pretty upscale, where old imperialists go to retire. It was during the summer and it was a trip to see these old men – old white men – with their old white wives, walking around going to the markets and taverns dressed in shorts and golf shirts.

They could have passed for retired professors, but I knew better. In their prime, these men were stone cold killers. I knew one of them. He’s pushing 70 now, but back in the 70s and 80s he would hop on a plane to some banana republic, spend a month or so doing god-knows-what, then just as his plane touched down in Dulles the TV would report some coup, some “regime change” or something far darker.

You’d ask him what he did on his “vacation” and he’d say, “oh the beaches were fantastic. I got a great tan.”

One of the reasons we like mafia movies so much is because it’s where white men are allowed to be “masculine prime” – violent, racist, promiscuous – while maintaining their civilized side: traditional, devout, with a family life.

Because men have both of these sides.

I can’t recommend enough an Australian series, Underbelly. The characters and plots are real. Season one and three are about the Australian organized crime of the 1980s and 1990s: drug dealing, especially MDMA and party drugs.

Carl Williams, a fat slob, basically a bogan, gets ambitious and murders the Moran brothers he was a driver for and muscles in on their ecstasy trade. It’s a wild ride watching this bogan go from a timid dork into a kingpin all while giving humorous interviews with the radio DJs pleading his complete innocence.

Brian Alexander is a quasi-lawyer who acts as a go between for the heroin dealers and the crooked cops – and Australia had a LOT of crooked cops on the take. When a Royal Commission is held to investigate police corruption and the government is closing in, the crooked cops decide Brian is a liability – he’s a “piss-pot with a big mouth” and his presumed murder (he simply disappeared and his body was never found) is dramatized as well as any Hollywood mafia murder:

Season two is a prequel about the Mr. Asia heroin syndicate run by an ambitious kiwi, Terry Clark and his hot, model girlfriends that smuggled the heroin for him. George Freeman, who was a famous “celebrity gambler” who owned a piece of every illegal casino in the 70s and 80s and was probably the closest to an “Australian Godfather” hires Chris Flannery, “Mr. Rent-a-Kill” to off all of his enemies, eventually having his partner, Lennie McPherson, killing Flannery before his can become a liability.

Season 4, “Razor” is set in the 1920 and features two women rivals, Tilly Devine who runs the prostitutes and Kate Leigh who runs the “sly grog” – illegal liquor during Prohibition – and their constant gang warfare and hilarious bitching at each other in the newspapers, a rivalry the newspapermen were more than happy to turn into a celebrity feud for the reading public.

The entire series has great writing, great acting, and great cinematography – all while staying very close to historical fact. Especially in the first season, the actors that play Carl Williams, George Freeman and Lennie McPherson are spitting images of their historical counterparts.

Also lots of spanking, so you know it’s good.

Highly recommended.

Sun Tzu, The Myth of the 20th Century, and NRx

I just never get tired of it.

In West Point the first book a cadet reads is Sun Tzu’s Art of War. What’s the most famous quote from AoW?

“All warfare is based on deception”

Here’s the longer quote:

“All warfare is based on deception. Hence, when we are able to attack, we must seem unable; when using our forces, we must appear inactive; when we are near, we must make the enemy believe we are far away; when far away, we must make him believe we are near.”

So I’m listening to Myth of the 20th Century, the edition about African colonialization. The resident Yockeyite, Alex, is whining about “pig Americans” and literally his voice breaks – he’s almost going to cry – when he says “Death to America.” (Not at all coincidentally, the only other time I can recall he nearly cried during the podcast is during the epiosde about the 1980s pedophile ring at the Catholic boy’s home in Kansas, “The Franklin Cover-up.” – although he actually blames this pedophile ring on … who else? WASPs.)

It’s so ridiculous the main guy, the serious and intelligent guy – Hank, I think – who just identifies as “Republican” auditorily rolls his eyes and mentions this is when he and Alex get into it.

So what has Alex so upset? The United States LIED. African decolonization was really about the US Empire taking over former African colonies from the old French, Spanish, English and German empires.


Occasionally he makes some point that America allowed non-Europeans – non-whites – to “have a say in European affairs.” But he’s only outraged when America (thus – Protestants, and especially those who beat NSDAP Germany) does this. He rightfully mentions that Fascist Spain brought in African troops to rape and mutilate White Spanish Republicans, and that the French used colonial African troops against Europeans. But he saves his outrage for America. “Death the the pig Americans.”

Remember, this is an American Catholic Nazi-fetishist Neo-Reactionary.

So, what really is NRx, at its core? Well, the Jew that invented it, their “prophet” is of course Curtis Yarvin, whose OBVIOUS goal was to squid squid ink to cover up Jewish power and Jewish anti-whiteness, and to blame all the things the right hates on “liberals” and “the international Protestant conspiracy” etc.

But the ones that took it up were Catholics, the Alex types, although most of them aren’t *really* religious. Instead, they are “Catholics” in the organizational sense.

Forget the religious and cultic aspects. That is to miss the point. How is Catholicism organized?

It’s an imperial, hierarchal, oligarchic system.

You have bishops; the bishops ordain priests, then elevate some priests to bishops. Then the bishops vote one of their own as pope. It’s a self-selecting oligarchy. There is one Pope at the top, his advisors the bishops underneath, the priests are the officers, and the regular people are the congregants.

The smarter wing of NRx, that were called the “techno-commercial” wing, have mostly dropped out as far as I can tell. Which is too bad, because they were the ones that really had something interesting to say. They understood network effects, economics, corporate governance – really interesting group to read.

I don’t know what happened to them. All that is left is the actual religious Catholics, who are boring and irrelevant, and the Jim Donald types, which are really just a club of right-wing purity spiralers, mostly populated by Zionists and some young White guys into the idea of patriarchy and submissive wives (precisely because they are young, economically disenfranchied, and unmarried without children.)

Old perverts like Donald know how to cater to that crowd – I know how to cater to that crowd, and did it very successfully for a year, until it got boring and embarassing, so I dropped it.

So what’s left at NRx? Aside from policing the right wing for “anti-semitism” and anti-Zionism, what really is the core of NRx?

Let’s look at the summary:


Modern history is an epic tale of social decay under chronically bad government, masked by increasing technological wealth. The dominant liberal-progressive ideology is badly out of touch with reality, and actively destructive to civilization.

Two lies are obvious right out of the gate: modern history is NOT an epic tale of social decay. This is just LARPing that the 1400s were better. The second, most destructive lie is that the dominant ideology as of 2019 is “liberal-progressive.”

Liberals and Progressives are very much NOT in charge. We live in a neo-liberal – which really means POST-liberal society, and Progressivism proper died with LBJ, who was its most cynical proponent, and Richard Nixon, the last true progressive. The Reagan-Bush regime buried the very last of progressivism.

(Communists often called themselves “progressive” in English but that was nothing but propaganda, they were NOT in any way, shape, nor form a product of the Progressive movement of Teddy Roosevelt and Margaret Sanger.)

So, more NRx:

The core of our problem is that there is no one with the secure authority to fix things. The core of our solution is to find a man, and put him in charge, with a real chain of command, and a clear ownership structure.

Real leadership would undertake a proper corporate restructuring of USG: Pardon and retire all employees of the old regime; regularize international relations as explicitly either imperial or non-interventionist; nationalize and restructure the banks, media, and universities; and begin the long slow process of organic cultural recovery from centuries of dysfunction.

So, as the techno-commercial wing would say, there “secret sauce” is … centralize executive authority. In corporate terms, they want strong CEO and a weak board of directors. They hate activist shareholders.

OK, but let’s see some data? I know there is a huge corporate management literature about this, and one can read such debates every single day in the Wall Street Journal. NRx doesn’t even address any of that, they instead peddle right-wing historical narrative barely a step above the old John Birch Society, Catholic superstitions and Crusader LARPing, and of course pretentious rehashing of Greco-Roman history – classical studies.

But note the bold section. First, they just want to replace the entire ruling structure of American with … who, exactly? Literally the bloggers think THEY will become valued advisors to the new ruling class, because they promise to offer unquestioning sycophancy – that’s where “God-Emperor Trump” came from.

The second part, just as long as imperialists start telling the truth and stop lying we’ll finally have a good society!

Forget Sun Tzu, we should be open and forthright about our intentions, because only naughty people lie and trick people!

This is childishness. These are not adults with a realistic and “hard headed” view of the world, unlike those naive “liberals” and “progressives.”

What NRx really is: a bunch of lying Jews and Zionists manipulating some old doddering superstitious Catholic nutjobs and some young White boys who aren’t sophisticated and cynical enough to know they are being fed a line of crap.

Sun Tzu would be proud.

Opus Dei & Gearoid O’Colmain

ICAReviews introduced me to Gearoid O’Colmain, who seems to be a French Irishman, or perhaps an Irish Frenchman, who is at least quasi-Marxist, economically leftist, but critical of much of the “left” and especially anti-natalist ideologies like feminism and homophilia, what he calls “bourgeois sexuality.” (This isn’t unique, of course, it’s standard orthodox Communism.) He’s also not afraid to openly criticize Judaism-qua-Judaism and Jews-qua-Jews, almost unheard of on the left, who essentially believe that Jews are demi-gods.

Too good to be true? Of course. Even though O’Colmain is sympathetic toward even right wing nationalism, and doesn’t seem to be anti-white, and is pro-working class, he’s a typical Opus Dei E. Michael Jones type. He does want a New World Order, just one run from the Vatican. In other words, one of these quasi-Catholic LARPers.


We’ll get a global government, whether we like it or not:

Nonetheless, I believe we will have a global super-state in time whether we like it or not. Multipolarity has not brought global peace, nor did the multipolar order of 1913 prevent the first world war.

So, the only solution is to kiss the Pope’s ring:

Only a return to traditional Roman Catholicism could offer the prospect of overcoming the challenges of multicultural Europe. For the basis of European civilisation is constituted, as Alain Soral has wisely noted, by the Greek logos and the Roman caritas which are united in Christianity. Today logos has been buried in liberal and atheistic irrationalism and pseudoscience, while we have lost all sense of the beauty and necessity of Christian compassion or charity.

And “return” (/eyeroll) to the romantic days of medieval Europe:

The Roman Catholic and Apostolic Church was intended by God to be the guide of humanity, a link between heaven and earth guiding all men to their salvation. It was meant to be a one-world government under God. Since the Enlightenment ( a revolt against reason rather than for it) godless elites have striven for the creation of a universal republic, a Promethean dream of humanist supremacy, a universal Anti-Church- a world government under Satan.

Because “humanism” … “humanist supremacy” … is … “Satanic.”

These dorky pseudo-Catholics always want to “return” to the pre-Reformation days, precisely because the history before the printing press is rather spotty so they can project all their romantic notions on it. There’s a hilarious comment on, of all places, that cesspool of Google-Zionist-Globalism, YCombinator’s Hacker News, suggesting that medieval knights weren’t profit-seeking warlords, even though they could have been, but held to some gentlemanly code of chivalry. This is absurd, hasn’t anyone read the actual source materials of the Crusades? Yes, of course, the Crusades were a defensive measure against Muslim imperialism against Europe, and yes, the Catholic chuch did a credible job of federating Europeans to fight off the threat. But just read the source materials. The first-hand account of the Crusades I read, likely the very first primary source, in fact, written by an actual participant, spent the first half detailing the multiple-dozens of European cities the Crusaders would attack, then demand a “market” (I’ll always remember that is the word the translation used.) The entire first half was, “then we camped around this city, and the people surrendered, then came out with the best ‘market’ we had had in weeks. Then we attacked another city, they put up a fight, but we won, and they gave us an even better ‘market’.”

“Market” of course meant the people in the city had to open their gates, then give their food, tools, and weapons (and likely daughters as well) to the invading army – those knights who “weren’t warlords” – otherwise they would get murdered. The Crusaders spent the first half of their journey attacking Europeans until they sacked the recently Greek city of … Constantinople … which was almost certainly the actual goal, before (supposedly, likely mythologically) finishing up in “Jerusalem” – really, a little village called Al-Quds.

Yes, they stopped the Muslim advance – thank Jew-sus – but the only reason these quasi-Catholics have such a hard on for that time period is precisely because the history we have is so vague, and so distorted, they can project their romantic fantasies on that time. That’s why we called it “the Dark Ages” after all. (The only thing comparable is the romanticism we project onto the Greco-Roman culture, which is similarly shrouded in primitive, essentially pre-historiography. Or, for that matter, ignorant Protestant Bible-thumpers romanticizing mythological Old Testament tales about “Israel.”)

But then the Printing Press happened, literacy appeared, and the ugly – and not nearly as romantic – history came into focus. Sorry, Catholic Europe was not at all some sort of utopia. These people reject Voltaire precisely because he had their number. The Catholic Empire was a step in the right direction, but what came after was superior in every way.

I hate to be forced to channel the “New Atheists” of the 1990s (I’m not an atheist) but they are making me: grow up. The Church is a human institution, an outgrowth of the Roman Empire’s war against the Middle East and its imperial assimilation of Oriental cultures. “God” had nothing to do with it. The Pope was never anything more than a bureaucrat – interesting, because he was an example of “soft power” over “hard power.” Interesting, because the Church had an effect on our genetics (monogamy, outbreeding, etc., pace Kevin MacDonald.)

Again, the reason these neo-reactionary quasi-Catholics romanticize this time period is precisely because they know so little about it – we know so little about it. And the reason the post-Reformation period seems so ugly to them is because, for the first time, we have a continuous, written record about the reality – and it’s just not nearly as romantic – reality never is.

I’d have so much more respect for these quasi-Catholics if they at least gave us a reasonable interpretation of the social organization that the Church promoted. You get a little bit of this from Jones, etc., not much, but a little. For instance, the economic aspects of the monastaries, the distributionism economic system, the attempts to federate the monarchies (which you can be assured the Vatican hated, as they wanted Empire, not federation, but soft power can only do so much.)

But come on, it’s 2018. “A link between heaven and earth guiding all men to their salvation. It was meant to be a one-world government under God?” These are supposed to be the alternative to Protestant Bible-thumping? It’s all mystical woo-woo, meaningless verbiage.

I posit that it’s completely empty precisely because they can’t actually make it relevant. They have all the pieces, the instincts are certainly there (natalism, compassion for the poor, federalism, etc.) But they can’t actually bridge the gap from superstition to reality, in fact, it’s precisely the superstition (and their romance of the history) that they are defending – they are NOT actually defending the decent instincts the superstitions were created to explain. Nor are they even really defending the institution (that would be a good angle, IMO.) It’s the “mystery” and the “romance” that they are defending.

Why? Because they can’t accept reality – specifically, the reality of death, I guess. I heard these religion fanatics say this all the time, if there is no “God” then human life is meaningless. Says who? You literally can find no meaning in life without resort to a “god” based on ancient superstitions – and it’s always your particular version of “god” that is the only one?

You see the smart, educated types like E. Michael Jones trying to bridge this gap with his talk of “logos” – that’s how Jones avoids sounding like a superstitious peasant. The superstitious can talk about “God” … the Sky-Father … while the more philosophical types can discuss “logos,” “natural law,” “rationality” and the “order of the universe.” But really, for E. Michael Jones, the only “natural law” that he cares about is how anal sex is gross (I agree, but it’s hardly something to create an entire metaphysics around now is it? That is what animates Jones.) The critique of usury is great, very important, very much needed, but when will they get on with it? Jones actually punts on the economic specifics, he even says, “hey the Pope just said ‘ask your priest’ because we can’t figure out all these fancy financial instruments!”

Gotta give it to the Muslims – they take anti-usury seriously and have actually created serious economic systems without usury – even the Jew bankers have had to create “halal finance” to launder all their oil money.

But also – race? Jones – and I assume O’Colmain – really believe that race doesn’t matter, that genetics don’t matter, that evolution is one of those “godless humanist” plots, and every retarded fetus with a genetic mis-development has a “soul” that must be saved. Africa would be just as technologically advanced as Europe if they just adopted Augustinian Catholic “logos” or whatever.

This is why I can’t be a “right winger” – they are liars, mystifiers, and con artists. Jones is too smart to actually believe any of this stuff – and so is O’Colmain. But they need the, er, “less cognitively evolved” on their side so they can keep up the Universalism and not be “racist.”

They want an Empire.

Isn’t anyone else ready to MOVE ON?

Watch Out, White Nationalists, Here Come The Republicans

Watch out, White Nationalists, election time is here again, which means you will see the Republican party trying to co-opt you. There are four things to watch out for:

1. Transparent Negro-baiting. Counter-currents had a great article about this. The author that wrote about “The Talk” you have to have with your kids about avoiding “youth” and “teens” got the author fired from the conservative magazine precisely because it was simple and honest about race – it wasn’t race-baiting. Bill O’Reilly and Glenn Beck will engage in all sorts of race-baiting – complaining about ghetto Negroes – while at the same time telling us all they really need is tax cuts and government de-regulation, then the Negroes will don tri-corner hats and wave “Don’t Tread on Me” flags next to their White Conservative Brothers while discussing the Black Founding Father. Race-realism will be a firing offense, but lots of talk about the Democrat Liberal Plantation will be rife. The goal is to rile up enough whites to vote for Jeb Bush, not to actually come to a consensus and deal with racial reality.

Republicans are anti-White Nationalist. They are imperialists, and Empires are, by nature, multi-racial and multi-cultural . Sure, Republicans aren’t going to cater to Negroes, they prefer their imperial subjects a bit lighter and more Spanish-speaking. But make no mistake, to vote for a Republican is to vote AGAINST White Nationalism and AGAINST a White nation.

2. Jew ass-kissing Philo-semitism. Count the days until Jeb Bush shows up at the Wailing Wall with a Jew-Beanie on his head. Remember, while they pay lip service to Christianity, their real religion is Mammon, and Jews have the gelt. The Republicans will be praising the apartheid regime of Jew bigotry in Zionist-occupied Palestine to get all that Jew money. When Southerners want to send their kids to white schools – that’s bad “segregation” and “racism.” But if a Holy Jew deports Africans from Israel, sets up separate schools – hell, even separate roads for Jews and goyim – that is ok. For Republicans, White Nationalism is forbidden, while Jewish Nationalism – Zionism – is priority number one. Expect RINO neo-conservatives like Sheldon Adelson – and his neo-liberal counterpart Haim Saban, to give us the illusion of choice between supporting the shitty little country and its Jewish welfare state with our blood and money, or our money and blood.

Jews matter, Jews have rights. Whites have no rights – that would be “racist” – but instead have responsibilities to serve Jews. That’s the official Republican party platform.

3. Noise about “illegal immigration.” Republicans will go on and on about illegal immigration, but their solution is to replace the White population legally, not illegally. The easiest way to do that? Amnesty all the illegals right after the election, and increase legal immigration. If you complain about White people being replaced by foreigners, well, that makes you a racist. Remember, the GOP is the “color-blind party.”

Expect Jeb Bush to parade around his little Spanish-speaking children and his Latina wife. He’ll be promising amnesty and open borders to them in Spanish, while telling Whites something completely different in English.

4. We are already seeing this on the WN forums – the 9/11 Liars are back. The CIA Torture report is nothing but a fight over 9/11, by proxy. The torture program was instituted to get false confessions for 9/11, and to give credence to the myth of “Al Qaeda” – a super-secret conspiracy of Ragheads from around the world. They never did find a boogey-man on the level of Usama Bin Laden, the “former” CIA asset, so watch out if they start peddling some ISIS raghead as the “New Bin Laden,” etc.

TheOccidentalObserver have alread shown that the GOP are trying to pick an establishment, anti-white candidate now, before the primary even starts. So far, it’s Jeb Bush, Mitt Romney, and Tony Soprano Chris Christie. Jeb Bush operatives, especially, are going to be going after 9/11 truth most viciously, especially now that it’s so wide spread and they simply can’t afford an honest discussion about it.

Don’t be a fucking sucker, White Nationalists.

As one would expect, once the United States of America became the world’s top superpower, threatened only by the Soviet Union, there was a major internal struggle for power.

George Herbert Walker Bush was recruited by the CIA straight out of Skull & Bones at Yale. Bush seems to have been a point man for the various anti-Castro activities and part of the Bay of Pigs. So when JFK tries to break up the CIA afterward, it’s decided to do something about him. As LBJ had to get rid of JFK to avoid being sent to prison for his many crimes – including murder – he was likely enthusiastic about the plot. The various organized crime rings that had Havana for a base before Castro, which JFK had no interest in going to war over, were also a perfect ally and an organization with practical, hands-on experience murdering people.

So JFK goes, then five years later his brother, who was now a Senator and a favorite for the next Democratic President, also goes. Another five years and George H. W. Bush is the head of the CIA, at a time when the CIA is getting its worst legal and public exposure. The main things they were being investigated about were assassinations. Slipping exploding cigars to Castro made the headlines, but everyone knew which assassinations were really the issue here – it’s just that officially that’s taboo to talk about on TV.

So, Democrat Carter appoints William Colby and he basically spills the beans to Congress. So the Godfather runs for President, loses to Hollywood actor Ronald Reagan, then runs as his VP. Reagan wins in a landslide, then John Hinckley, a family friend of the Bushes, tries to assassinate him. John Hinckley doesn’t go to jail, he’s declared insane, and sent to private mental hospital that he’s allowed to leave to “visit his family.”

Reagan survives and continues to make TV appearances but most seem to acknowledge that Bush is in charge of things. He serves a term of President himself, but in a highly unusual three-way race, Clinton – who seemed to know quite a bit about George Bush’s Iran-Contra criminality via the Mena airport – beats him.

So a few years later, JFK’s son, JFK Jr. decides to get into magazine publishing. There is definite speculation that JFK Jr. wanted to prove something about his father’s assassination, and he puts out a political magazine and names it “George.”

No, not after George H. W. Bush, the man who many think killed his father and uncle, but after George Washington.

JFK Jr. makes a major speech before the Democratic Convention in 1996 and is widely seen as a contender for becoming their next nominee, and likely President. It’s pretty much conventional wisdom that he would win the primary and was seen as an extremely likely winner – nostalgia over his father and uncle would prove catnip for the media.

Then, JFK JR., his wife, his unborn baby, and his wife’s sister, all die in a plane crash. The Navy takes control over the search and rescue and takes days to find the crash site. Then they bury them all at sea.

George H. W. Bush’s son, George W. Bush, runs for President against Vice President Al Gore, and the race it so close it all depends on Florida, where Bush’s other son, Jeb Bush, happens to be governor. It’s basically a tie, the Supreme Court of Florida declares a recount, but the US Supreme Court overrules them and declares George W. Bush the President.

The Washington Post, the New York Times, the Miami Herald and the Wall Street Journal subpoena all the ballots from Florida and do their own recount. The results are supposed to be released on Thusday, September 13th, but the greatest terrorist attack in US history happens, with US ally Saudi Arabia sending 19 hijacker to America, to train on CIA-affiliated airbases, and hijack four civilian airplanes, where one hits the Pentagon, two hit the towers of the WTC in New York, and one disintegrates over Pennsylvania. Then both towers at the WTC disintegreate themselves. Then, later that day, another skyscraper, World Trade Center 7, demolishes itself.

A few months later, anthrax from a military base in Maryland is sent to the two Democratic senators who were blocking passage of the PATRIOT Act, thus changing their minds.

A year later, a crazy sniper called “John Muhammed” – whose real name is actually “John Washington,” a former US Army soldier declares his belief in Allah, changes his name, then goes around DC shooting random people, including some FBI agents investigating the terrorism.

Then, George W. Bush reclassifies all the records from his father’s administration.

Did I leave anything out?

You see, none of the facts themselves are even all that controversial. That all happened, and everyone acknowledged that they happened. But putting it together in the obvious way – writing the narrative in the obvious and simple way, well, it just doesn’t seem like America.

Sure, if it was the USSR or Russia , if someone said, yeah Putin, former KGB, killed that politician that was going to run against him, or if, say, Stalin had someone liquidated, no one would bat an eye. If Manuel Noriega’s henchmen murdered some opposition party leader, we’d just snicker and say, sure, it’s a banana republic.

But to even tell the story – even though most of these facts are pretty much openly acknowledged – is by definition, heresy, unpatriotic, and a conspiracy theory.

So we have the CIA coming up with all sorts of subtle and not-so-subtle ways to assassinate people, sometimes looking like an accident and sometimes looking like a message. We also know the CIA has worked with organized crime – gangsters that murder people for hire.

So, there’s no surprise there, really. The surprise isn’t even so much that it’s taboo to discuss these things in the paper. What’s surprising in how the public has accepted this taboo internally. In the old Soviet Union, no one believed what Pravda said and everyone know the KGB would kill their opposition.

Here in America, we think “someone would have talked” and “some newspaper man would make a name for himself by telling the story.”

Lesson for Democrats: unless you’re willing to assassinate your opponents, you’re probably not going to really wield power.

Countries Bombed: Obama 7, Bush 4. Cancel His Peace Prize!

Likely the main reason Obama was elected was due to America’s fatigue from the endless 9/11 Wars of the Bush administration. Right after his election, he was given the Nobel Peace Prize due to the wide-spread belief that Obama would bring the wars to an end one way or another. While Obama always declared his support for the occupation of Afghanistan and fighting “Al Qaeda” he promised to “bring the troops home,” from Iraq and was expected to prevent future wars.

Of course, as soon as Obama got into office, he not only doubled-down on the wars of the Bush administration, but then began bombing a series of Middle Eastern nations and staging coups. Peace Prize Obama has now, in fact, surpassed the Bush administration’s war mongering. Obama has now invaded, occupied, and/or bombed:

1. Afghanistan

2. Iraq

3. Pakistan

4. Somalia,

5. Yemen,

6. Libya

7. Syria.


Obama is yet another neo-con. Just as the neo-cons of the Bush administration were “former” Trotskyite Communists who also happened to be Zionists, Obama’s administration was staffed with “former” Marxists who also happened to be Zionists. Both the Bush administration and the Obama administration opposed nationalism for Americans while promoting nationalism for Israeli Jews.

Within two months of taking office, it was reported that Obama immediately rejected the appeals of human rights groups to prosecute the CIA for its torture under the Bush administration and stop the program. Closing Gitmo was a major campaign promise that he immediately reneged on. From the day Obama was sworn in, he escalated the 9/11 Wars, expanded their scope, and had the CIA stage coups against various Arab and Muslim governments.

Liberals, left-wingers, and progressives who supported Obama are now revealed to be either dupes or hypocrites, and Obama’s anti-white policies are simply of a piece with the rest of his imperialism. White Americans are simply one group being attacked by the Washington DC Empire, along with Arabs, Muslims, Palestinians, and all the nationalities of Europe.


Obama’s support for the demographic displacement of White Americans via mass immigration is simply another imperialist policy – population transfers have been carried out by empires since the ancient world. Just as Zionists in the Levant are demographically displacing the Palestinians via settlement, so Obama – an ardent Zionist and a member of a political party dedicated to Zionist expansion – is demographically displacing Americans via settlement, called “immigration.” The progressives, liberals, and left-wingers that support Obama’s imperialist policy of demographic displacement of Americans also support, either openly or tepidly, the demographic displacement of Palestinians and Europeans.

Bush was strongly pro-immigration and attempted to pass “immigration reform” over the objections of the people that voted for him. Obama has also expanded Bush policy in this case, quite possibly using administrative fiat to hasten the displacement process. The demographic displacement of Palestinians is executed with extreme violence, the demographic replacement of Europeans and Americans is also executed with extreme violence, this violence being minimized as “street crime” and censored from the media.


A key event in Obama’s campaign against McCain was the financial collapse of 2008. Despite widespread public outrage, banks were given billions of dollars in bailouts, and while Obama’s fans were crowing about reform, Wall Street became Obama’s number one campaign contributor. When in office, Obama continued the bailout policies of the Bush administration, prevented any meaningful reform of the financial sector, and moved to protect the Federal Reserve from public scrutiny.

No meaningful reform of the financial sector was proposed by the Obama administration, and no serious prosecutions were undertaken. In fact, Obama’s Justice Department refused to prosecute the vast majority of cases.

The Obama administration’s policies are indistinguishable from the Bush administration’s policies. Progressives, liberals, and left-wingers are revealed to be the Little Eichmanns that they are – at best complicit by silence in this administration’s crimes. However, plenty of progressives, liberals and left-wingers are openly pro-genocide, not merely complicit by silence but active, vocal, enthusiastic supporters of population transfers – defined as a crime against humanity by the United Nations.

Obama has also enhanced the police state and presided over the militarization of domestic law enforcement. Bob Whitaker’s “Mantra” received quite a bit of criticism for talking about “genocide” yet it is correct in describing imperial policy as such. The Obama regime is totalitarian, imperialist, and genocidal.

Today, Obama bombs Syria, tomorrow, maybe you.



Wag The Dog 8

So if you’re an imperialist military that needs soldiers and votes from a democratic population, wouldn’t your first order of business be:

a) denying the enemy the ability to propagandize your population

b) propagandizing your own population about the enemy

Would you want the opposing force to get on TV and have a fair opportunity at making their case to your population? Of course not. Whoever the enemy is, you would appoint people to represent the opposition leaders for public consumption. You want your population to perceive the enemy the way you want them to, not the way the enemy wants them too.

Hence, the “War on Terror,” Osama Bin-Laden, Al Qaeda. USA invaded Afghanistan, Iraq, and intervened in a dozen other countries in the last 13 years. If you are a conservative, patriotic white Republican and actually believed there was a world wide radical Muslim terrorist group called “Al Qaeda” that we were fighting, I have two pieces of news for you.

1) Professional wrestling is “worked.”

2) US military propagandists are far, far smarter than you are.

Operation Gladio, Sibel Edmonds, Boiling Frogs, and the Turkish Connection

FBI 9/11 whistleblower Sibel Edmonds explains “Gladio B.” Notice who the terrorists recruited by NATO were – the Turkish “Babas” – the “Godfathers” – those in jail for heroin trafficking, blackmail, extortion, etc. Organized crime, in other words. It’s common knowledge now, but the CIA and the US military long associated with organized crime in the US and used their services in keeping the civilian population in line. And it was the government – NOT the mafia – that reached out. The government chose the mafia, not the other way around.

You find this pattern repeated by US imperalists in South America and South East Asia, especially the drug producers (Colombia) – in fact, in South East Asia, the drug trade always moves from country to country depending on which has the most American military presence (Vietnam, to Cambodia, to Burma/Myranmar, now, north west to Afghanistan.)

Since NATO was started to fight the Soviet Union, these paramilitary terrorist organizations were always labelled “right wing” and “nationalist” – but is that particularly true? In what ways can the mafia, drug kingpins, heroin dealers, and extortionist be considered “right wing,” “ultra-nationalist” or even political at all?

According to Communism, Fascism is when captialists (the rich) try to blunt the power of popular movements and elected officials in order to prevent levelling, the poor redistributing wealth and assets to themselves. Certainly, in the US, it seems to work that way. The Republican party is largely funded by the wealthy and works to prevent any sort of social policy that benefits the poor over the rich. But certainly, the Republican party – a hotbed of internationalism, global corporatism, and sympathy for cheap labor and mass, race-replacing immigration – cannot be considered “nationalist” in any significant way; they are internationalists, although they do promote a very different kind of internationalism/globalism than Communists claimed to.

This, then, explains the brutality of the USA “Deep State” and how it can pull off things such as assassinations of US Presidents, and even major terrorist attacks like 9/11. They recruit their terrorists from the criminal class. During the Contra wars of the 1980s in Central America, the US sided with “traditional power” – landowners, and especially, the managers of the local branches of US corporations. While their opponents were often much less white, much less Westernized, and much poorer. One sees the same thing in Venezuela, where Chavez’s party was the party of the poor brown masses, while the US proxy leaders were urban, upper class whites. The left has always been correct, in a sense, that there is a race war component to USA imperialism, and it’s also true that the whiter an ethnic group is, the more powerful, the more advanced technology, the more socially advanced. Unlike “anti-racist” complaints, however, it is not some special brutality on the part of the lighter skinned – the darks at least match the whites when it comes to brutality – it’s that the higher IQ whites, when they do engage in brutality, are much more effective, usually. While Rwandans can merely hack themselves to pieces with imported machetes (they can’t even make machetes themselves) a white population might use, say, drones to bomb villages.

Nevertheless, it should not be obscured that in the USA, it’s the very White (and Jewish) ruling class that is targeting the White majority population for replacement via immigration, and certainly, in cases like 9/11, Whites were the primary victims. From the Whiskey Rebellion, to the War of Northern Aggression, to the mass slaughters of the World Wars, to the imperialist ventures post-WWII, to the 9/11 Wars, the White (and now Jewish) ruling class has never been slow to put “their own people” in harm’s way, directly and indirectly.

While some sort of genetic sociopathy often explains the brutality, simple power differentials often do as well. Modern war and terrorism are planned from afar, far away from the victims and the gore, so this psychological (and physical) distance lessens the ability for the perpetrators to sympathize with the victims – in much the same way that a powerful man might not at all sympathize with the relative powerless position of a mistress, in fact, even fetishize it.

Perhaps that might explain stories like this:


and why CIA programs often look like something out of BDSM porno.

That is, perhaps, a more subtle sentiment than it might appear on the surface. Read it twice.




Now, what is quite interesting here, is that Edmonds says this Turkish Muslim terrorist group recruited by NATO was eventually replaced with “Al Qaeda” – also seemingly recruited by USA and its allies like Saudi Arabia. ISIS, an outgrowth of “Al Qaeda in Iraq,” is similarly positioned to carry out false flag attacks under the banner of Islamism, just like the Turkish/NATO Operation Gladio carried out false flags under the banner of Communism.

And just like the Turks in Operation Gladio, just like Abdullah Catli above, the “Al Qaeda” terrorists that purportedly highjacked the airliners on 9/11, we all given US visas.

Let’s not forget, Mike Springman, former head of the American visa bureau in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, said he tried to keep the hijackers out of the US, as they were known terrorists, but he was overruled by the CIA. This has been open, common knowledge for years, yet it has never seemed to enter into the thick skulls of conservative Republicans, but the CIA brought the hijackers to America.

The Synagogue of Satan

You Shall Know Them By Their Fruits
You Shall Know Them By Their Fruits

Many years ago I started a correspondence with a mulatta woman whose father was a relatively high ranking official in the Roman Catholic Church in the Caribbean. She was a peace activist and corresponded with the Iraqi resistance. One day she sent me a panicked email saying that women were being raped and tortured in Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq. There were a few articles printed about how the Iraqi resistance had attacked the prison, trying to blow it up and kill everyone inside. This was puzzling to a lot of people – why would the Iraqis want to kill their fellow Iraqis – many of them part of the resistance themselves – who had been captured?

What had happened was women in the prison had smuggled out notes asking the resistance to destroy the prison and kill them, because they would rather be dead than endure the rape and torture any longer. Lots of dark rumors floated about, but when the pictures were released and General Anthony Taguba made his report, the reality was far more wicked than any of the worst rumors.

Bizarre sexual torture was being inflicted on Iraqis, both men and women, like something out of De Sade. When the scandal broke a few low level soldiers were scapegoated, and the men responsible for this sexual torture program – Donald Rumsfeld and Douglas Feith – were never even prosecuted. Many Christians who had supported the wars denounced the torture.

Except for one group, that oddly, did their very best to justify the sexual abuse of men and women in Iraq. These were the Dispensationalists. Also known as “Christian” Zionists. So this woman and I started researching this “Christian” Zionist movement, and quickly it led right down the rabbit hole.

It started with a little cult group of cranks in the 1800s, the Millerites. Miller was a scam artist that told people he was a prophet and that the Rapture was happening on such and such a date, so he gathered all his followers and their took off their clothes and climbed up into trees in order to be closer to the sky when the event happened. Of course, it didn’t, and most people left the cult. But Miller just said he made a mistake and set a new date, and his more hardcore followers went through the same routine again, and after the second failure, Miller seems to have just run off with the money.

It's Money That I Love
It’s Money That I Love

This cult still exists; some radio huckster named Harold Camping did the same thing in 1996, and again in 2011. In 2011, his followers were selling everything they owned, giving the money to Family Radio, and camping out outside of his station waiting for D-day. He was asked afterwards if he would return the money – no extra points for guessing what he said.

The Zionist movement was started in the late 1800s by the Rothschild family, which lavishly funded the cause. A few years later, a huckster named Cyrus Scofield published his Scofield Reference Bible, which was a commentary of the Scripture that promoted political Zionism. This was a new religion; a novel and outlandish interpretation of the Bible that went against 2,000 years of Christian teaching and was opposed by the Roman Catholic Church, the Eastern Orthodox Church, and all Protestant demoniations, including the Anglicans, the Presbyterians, and the Baptists (real Baptists that follow the London Baptist Confession of Faith, not the “make it up as you go along” Baptists of modern America.) For preachers with little formal education and a lack of Hebrew and Greek, the Scofield Reference Bible – which was lavishly funded and promoted by political Zionists – became a replacement for Christian teaching.

The main heresy it taught was Dispensationalism, which was in direct opposition to the traditional teaching of Protestant Christianity, Covenant Theology. The Zionists started calling the traditional Christian teaching of Covenant theology “replacement theology” and said that the entire Christian church for 2,000 years had everything wrong, but in fact the political Zionists of the 1800s finally got the “right” interpretation of the Bible. Dispensationalism was always associated with the various rapture cults like the Millerites. This novel heresy was basically ignored by the entire Christian church, but found favor among various Pentecostal and non-denominational cults. The only mainstream denomination it ever found favor in was the Southern Baptist Convention, which to this day, has a serious infection of Dispensationalism, although officially the SBC is neutral.

This particular brand of heresy has long been associated with the American Empire. The Rapture narrative itself is an innovation. Virtually all Christians have always subscribed to what is called “partial preterism” which is a belief about Biblical prophesy. Dispensationalism made up an entirely new interpretation of Biblical prophesy tailored to meet the needs of political Zionism and American imperialism.

The Reality Isn't All That Different
The Reality Isn’t All That Different

Interestingly enough, Dispensationalism was popularized with various cartoons. There’s a very interesting history to cartooning. Comic books were essentially a Jewish folk art; famously, Superman started out as a stereotype of a Jewish New Deal superhero. Comic books have also been used to popularize and defend the Federal Reserve System, which has it’s own official series of comic books, and the 9/11 Commission report, which was – I kid you not – also released in comic book form. The attack on the Pentagon was never shown on television, but instead, computer animations of an airliner flying into the Pentagon was shown on TV instead. It’s very odd, but lots of people seemed to remember the computer animation as if it was actual video.

So, whenever something is being sold by means of comic books and animation, it pays to remember this history.

When Zionists delivered a bag full of cash to Harry S. Truman in return for recognizing the Zionist entity in Palestine, there was a major campaign to mainstream Dispensationalism. When Stalin had purged the USSR leadership of many Jews, the Zionist entity in Palestine – which was founded as a quasi-communist state, dedicated to socialism and Marxist through and through – turned against Stalin. The USSR made a strategic decision to support their various Arab allies over the Zionist entity.

Communism and Zionism: Two Sides of the Same Coin
Communism and Zionism: Two Sides of the Same Coin

So the Dispensationalists came up with a new, novel interpretations of Scripture. The atheist communists of the USSR were actually “Gog and Magog” which were going to start a Final Battle against Israel, and American was called by God to battle for the shitty little country against the Communist menace.

Well, it didn’t work out. The USSR fell, and communism and Marxism were utterly discredited. Various leftists that had been proud Marxists and communists started rebranding themselves. The Dispensationalists weren’t sure what to do, as their prophesies had turned out to be completely false.

Well, they got their second wind on September 11, 2001. They immediately changed all of their prophesies. No longer was Gog and Magog the atheist communists of the USSR, now Gog and Magog was Iraq, Iran, and any other enemies of the Zionist entity in Palestine. The entire Dispensationalist movement started raking in money hand over fist with lurid scare stories about “Al Qaeda” and the Final Battle between Muslims and Jews, assisted by their shabbos goyim, American Dispensationalists. The high point was when George W. Bush literally – literally – pranced around on the bodies of victims of the September 11 attacks and yelled through a bullhorn about how he was going to start a war.

Just a few years later, when US forces were raping, sodomizing, beating and torturing women and men in Iraq, the Dispensationalists were the first to excuse and justify it, as they claimed they were fulfilling Biblical prophesy.

Political Zionism itself is nothing but nationalism for Ashkenazi Jews, thus, unobjectionable. But “Christian” Zionism is an actual rejection of the Gospel and the Christian faith. The Church is the “Israel of God” and the promises made to Abraham and the nation of Israel were fullfilled through the Church; Christ was the replacement for the temple in Jerusalem. “Christian” Zionism turns this all on its head, and makes political Zionism a religious ideology.

“Christian” Zionism tends to devolve into what it actually is; Noahchidism – Judaism for Gentiles. It’s a bizarre religion that is 100% incompatible with Christianity. Since it is an absolute rejection of the Gospel, “Christian” Zionists are not just some wayward cult, and not just some heresey – they are not Christians at all.

The Synagogue of Satan, as it were.

Interestingly, there is an older strand of “Christian” Zionism – it’s called Freemasonry, the central figure of which is Lucifer. Zionism was always a terrorist movement, and it was just a few years ago that another “Christian” Zionist – and a Freemason – named Brievik murdered nearly a hundred teenagers in Norway in the name of defending the Zionist entity in Palestine. The Norway Labor Party was just about to nominate Palestine for membership in the UN when the Zionist terrorists murdered their children. The Times Square bombing happened while the UN was meeting and discussing Palestine a few years ago.

The take away is this – “Christian” Zionism is not just some weird cult group, it’s an evil ideology, very similar to communism and in fact created by the same people that created communism. And just like Communism, Zionism is a blood thirsty ideology with a long track record of terrorism, murder, torture, and rape.