“Almost everyone who has been around me has turned out to be a secret agent working for the Jews, working for the CIA. The Jews have planted so many of their Jew agents and CIA rats all around me, so many people, girlfriends, lawyers, almost everybody turned out to be working for the CIA and the Jews. Unbelievable but true.” — Bobby Fischer
A few months ago I saw some traffic coming to my blog and found it linked by an article titled “I Am A Jailbait” on a blog called “Triweekly Antifeminist” written by an author calling itself “Tom Grauer.” He promotes an idea he calls “Male Sexualism.”
I’m sure you can figure out the basic idea from this quote from his article:
it is perfectly natural, healthy, and normal for all men to sexually desire 15-year-olds. Once you admit to the truth, there is no going back away from the truth. You took the bait – and, the internet being what it is, you are busted forever. Score a victory for Male Sexualism. Every man who admits to it being natural to sexually desire teenagers is a victory for our side.
He then quotes a paragraph from my “Baltimore Stories,” a fictional series about a teenage boy living in Baltimore:
Now, Amanda had gone to high school with us. My first memory of Amanda is helping her break into her father’s house. Of course, her father was obviously rich as shit, judging by the house. I mean, I asked her what was up. She said she hated her father. I said why? She didn’t want to talk about it, and Amy – you know, the little Blondie slip of a thing I had been fucking since she was 15 – just gave me a look that basically said “don’t ask.” Amanda said, “the things he did to me, he owes me. I’d take every fucking cent he had just to get away from him.”
Apparently, this paragraph got Tom Grauer all excited and he decided that now I was a part of his “Male Sexualism” movement, whether I liked it or not. You can simply read the language hinting at some sort of threat:
Once you tell the truth, can’t deny it anymore. It is documented. It is archived for eternity, at least somewhere. No joke, everything ever written is documented. “Hipster Racist,” a blogger, once wrote the following on one of his blogs … What’s that, Hipster? Granted, his story may be fictional. Who knows. But, be it truthful or fanciful, it is revealing. You are one of us, Hipster. … Nor can you effectively shut yourself down. “Delete everything” is just not a viable option in this day and age. Once written, can’t be un-written.
But Tom Grauer deleted that blog and started a new one, called “Male Sexualism Blog: Exploring an Alternative to Modern Sex-Crime Legislation” at tomantifeminist.home.blog. He essentially rewrote his article “I Am A Jailbait” as ““Muh 16” May be The Puritan-Feminist Party Line, But The Party Itself is Losing Popularity” and, apparently to get my attention, posted this comment on my blog as “Surreal.”
Oy vey goyim, muh age of consent, support Palestine.
In the vernacular of the “Alt Right” – and especially the (((Hollywood Nazi))) faction, this sentence means, “Hey stupid goy, the JOOOOOZ you are so paranoid about want you to support an age of consent law and to support Palestine.
I found it funny – and revealing – that he just couldn’t help himself and freaked out because I sometimes write about the Palestinian cause and the apartheid regime of Jew bigotry in Zionist-occupied Palestine. This makes me a target of Zionist Jews because I support the human rights of Palestinian people. To a Zionist Jew, this is “anti-semitic” and so this Jew has decided to throw around back-handed threats to me, suggest I’m some sort of pervert that wants to lower the age of consent and have sex with 15 year old girls – and points out, on multiple occasions, that even if I were to delete this story, it wouldn’t matter because the internet is forever, etc.
Of course, I’m not the one deleting my blogs and posts – that’s him. Nor am I advocating lowering the age of consent nor creating an ideology called “Male Sexualism” all about normalizing adult men having sex with teenage girls. That would be him, Tom Grauer, who does those things and in fact cites Jewish rabbis to back him up in his four part series, “Obadiah Shoher’s Relevance to Male Sexualism.”
Interestingly, like most “neo-reactionary” followers of (((Curtin Yarvin’s))) “NRx” ideology, to Tom Grauer all problems are caused by … “Puritans” (i.e., White Anglo-Saxon Protestants) … and it is these “Puritans” and the modern “Feminist” partners that are oppressing men by making it illegal for men to have sex with girls under the age of sixteen, and, I suspect, to “consume” pornography featuring girls under the age of 18.
He’s not the only NRx blogger who talks about “ten year old girls” being sexually interested in adult men either – so does “Jim” of Blog.Jim.com – another (((Curtin Yarvin))) NRx fan who is also a Zionist and hates “anti-seeeeemites” and Palestinians who also blames “Puritans” for all the problems of the world.
(Full disclosure: I am the decendant of Puritans.)
I would have of course ignored Tom Grauer, in fact never even had heard of him, if he didn’t try to rope me into his bizarre “ideology” by purposefully trying to defame me by mischaracterizing a paragraph from a fictional story.
But when you mention the human rights of Palestinians, it’s really only a matter of time until a Zionist Jew like Tom Grauer comes after you, trying to defame your character, paint you as an “extremist” and an “anti-seeeeeeeemite” and even go so far as to start an ostensibly pro-pedophilia blog to try to defame people by association – or in this case, non-association.
A quick glance at his blog made me think at first he is simply a pornsick man desperately trying to justify his “legal teen porn” addiction – and that may be a part of it.
But when you have a Zionist Jew like Tom Grauer attacking Palestinians and those who support their human rights by trying to defame them as pedophiles, it’s pretty obviously one of those “Canary Mission” employees – professional Zionist hasbara engaged in a smear campaign against anyone noticing Zionist Jew genocide against Palestinians – and “Puritans” – “Puritan” being a code word for “WASP” and, more generally, “White American.”
Anyone familiar with my blogging career knows that I’ve never advocated for the lowering of the age of consent (as far as I can remember I’ve never even written about the age of consent) nor have I ever suggested that men were oppressed by “AOC laws” nor that it’s acceptable for adult men to have sex with 15 or 16 year old girls. Nor have I ever done what NRx Jim and Tom Grauer do and claim that ten year old girls want to have sex with adult men.
That sounds like a pedophile projecting, does it not?
Best advice: stay away from these NRx freaks, advocates for pedophilia, and Jews who are into “neo-reaction.”
Sincerely, “Hipster Puritan.”
The Atlantic was once a respectable White Anglo-Saxon Protestant magazine for the New England liberal elites.
Since it was bought by the Jew Jeffrey Goldberg it has devolved into a laughable tabloid trying to sell hardcore Zionist Jew apartheid and Palestinian genocide – and White Genocide – to the remnants of the White upper middle classes. Goldberg actually hired George W. Bush’s old speechwriter David Frum, who coined the term “Axis of Evil” to get Americans to destroy Israel’s enemies, Iraq and Iran. Why? Because Judaism is a racist hate cult that wants to murder Arabs particularly and Muslims in general.
Taking advice from a racist hate cult that wants your people genocided is generally a bad idea.
So of course now The Atlantic is no longer a magazine for intellectual White liberals, but is reduced to Salon.com style Social Justice Warriorism. A recent article asks: Why Don’t More Men Take Their Wives’ Last Names?
You can read it if you want, here:
But of course the answer is simple. Patriarchy is the bedrock of civilization, and the way you connect fathers to sons – and thereby get men to invest in children and grandchildren – is by offering them immortality through a family name. A legacy.
As my former co-blogger Cly once pointed out, it used to be common for the American (and I suppose European) middle classes to name their small family businesses “Smith and Sons.”
Why this emphasis on the male lineage? Because everyone already knows the matriarchal lineage. “Mother’s Baby, Daddy’s Maybe.” You have to convince the father the children are actually his and women have created an entire culture around doing just that.
Not only do grandmothers assure their sons in law that “your baby has your eyes” – they now even claim that the sonograms look “just like” the supposed father!
As soon as patriarchy – including young women being married as virgins – went out of style – so did marriage. Otherwise, what is the point? Of all the problems caused by the destruction of traditional marriage, for me the most annoying are all the articles in blogs by post-wall women complaining “where have all the good men gone?” “How come after spending my 20s engaging in promiscuity that would make a Parisian whore blush I can’t find a wealthy, handsome man to pretend I’m a nervous 17 year old virgin bride and pledge the rest of his life to me in return for a single child that is probably his?”
If I were a petty man, I’d guffaw at all the middle aged single women I’ve seen go ballistic when a successful 30 year old man ignores all the single over-credentialed 30 year old women to take up with young, fertile 20-somethinig baristas. Hell, I know of this because I’ve done it myself – and seen the reaction.
But the costs to my people and my society is just too damn high – below replacement fertility, bitter spinsters and “single” mothers, and an epidemic of divorce.
If any older White women actually cared about our people, they would be the FIRST telling those young, fertile, attractive women – “he’s a good catch – marry him now and start making babies! You’ll be happier in the long term.”
Listening to some nutty feminist being published by a bunch of racist, White-and-Palestinian-genociding Zionist Jews telling us that instead men should take their wive’s name in some sort of bizarre cross-dressing fetish that appeals to no one is pretty much the worst thing that anyone could do.
What next? Gender-bending for kids?
Anthony, Nick, and E. Antony are joined by Ryan Landry and welcome special guest The Rebbe to talk about the second half of the Puritan-Judaism theory of Progressivism. In part 1, they cover Jewish perspectives on Christ, the ethnic divisions within modern Jewry, how nationalism saved Israel, and much more.
This episode is brought to you in part by generous donations from our listeners Anonymous in VA, The Bermudan Reactionary, Gladio, Edmund Burkenstock, and a special gift from our guest, The Rebbe.
The neo-reaction motto: Jews are to blame for nothing, Protestants are the blame for everything, White Nationalism is bad, and the solution to our problems is to LARP about restoring a monarchy. Just no racial solidarity or anti-semitism.
Harvey ‘Jack’ McGeorge.
In context, McGeorge was one of the UN Weapons Inspectors attacked by the
neo-cons of the Bush administration in their effort to drive UN Weapons
inspectors out of Iraq because they knew that Saddam Hussein had no “Weapons of
Mass Destruction.” The UN Weapons inspectors were a thorn in the side of the
neo-cons of the Bush administration because they provided some resistance to the
WMD fraud. Presumably, McGeorge’s sex life was made an issue to discredit the UN
It may be more complex than that, but, in context, the Washington Post article
about McGeorge was part of a series of articles attacking the UN in order to justify the neo-conservative/Bush war against Iraq using the fake “WMD” pretext.
The New York Times had a series of articles at the same time also pushing the
fake “WMD” narrative, exemplified by Judith Miller, who funneled false stories from a never-named “contact” among the neo-cons/Israeli 5th Column in the Bush administration.
Presumably, what you call the “lifer” faction of CIA opposed the “outsourced”
faction – which at the time were Israeli assets/partisans – and McGeorge’s
(McGeorge, as part of the UN faction, presumably able and willing to admit the
truth about the non-existent WMDs) sex life was exposed in a slapdash effort to
derail the UN Weapons inspectors, which would have found no “WMDs” and the fact that the Saddam Hussein government was cooperating fully with the USA and the UN.
(The “lack of qualification” arguments were similar; McGeorge did not lack qualifications and was endorsed by the highest levels of the UN; the fact his PhD was not in the three specializations mentioned in the hit piece was frankly irrelevant. The scientific evidence of the non-existent “WMDs in Iraq” was never seriously in doubt by anyone – this was an exercise in propaganda.)
Of all NRx complaints about the Enlightenment, has the emancipation of the Jews ever been mentioned as a downside?
Watson, in Jews, Puritans and Whites OH MY!, catches Kevin McDonald pretty much agreeing with the neoreactionary dictum: “It’s not just the Jews.”
Is it really “it’s not just the Jews?” Or is it “it’s never the Jews?”
Notice the tone, MacDonald is “caught,” “oh my!” As if MacDonald has never mentioned anything other than Jews. One of MacDonald’s most important pieces was “The Indigenous Culture of Critique.”
This sort of tone might be appropriate in a situation in which Jews are blamed for everything. But in modern America, and the West in general, Jews are blamed for nothing. In fact, it’s a signal of low social status to even notice that Jews have any power at all.
Jews run Hollywood? That’s a “conspiracy theory.” Jews overrepresented in politics? “So what, they work hard and are smarter than you, you’re just blaming your personal failure on Jews!” When Whites were overrepresented in the Ivy League, that was an example of structural racism. Now that Jews dominate the Ivy League, they got in all on merit?
NRx seems quite unwilling to critique Jews for anything at all, don’t they? If Jews caused problems in the 20th Century, we must go back further until we can blame it on some European group. “Sure Jews did this bad thing, but this other person did something bad too, so why blame Jews?”
Here nickbsteves engages in some extremely common philo-semitism:
Not only is it “Not just the Jews,” but, if it were they would truly be the master race psychologically speaking and would pretty much deserve, from an evolutionary perspective, all of the spoils they have obtained.
If we were talking about *any other group* – anyone at all *but* Jews, do you think nickbsteves would say the same thing?
One suspects that everything about the Enlightenment can be criticized *except* that it liberated the Jews.
It’s all very kosher isn’t it?
It would be a mistake to start “counting Jewish noses” in NRx, or pointing to Moldbug’s purported Jewish grandfather. There’s another dynamic at work here. I suspect it is similar to the allergy to ethno-nationalism and explicit advocacy for White interests and instead the focus on IQ. The idea is to create a coalition that includes just enough “diversity” – you know, Jews, White guys with half-Asian children, a smattering of Japanese and Sub-continentals – something that looks like Amren.
Instead of a biological continuum, it’s an artificial group – whoever gets X on the IQ tests.
You know, something that looks like Silicon Valley.
Because anything ELSE would actually draw the wrath of the
They are just run of the mill conservatives giving themselves a fancy name and posing as great intellectuals.
Especially if your audience is made up of partisan Republican conservative types – let’s face it, those morons will believe anything.
Syria facilitated IS to ensure that any opposition to the Kremlin/Tehran propped Assad regime would not be armed by the US and EU. I have articles from witnesses showing Assad made road-blocks assisting IS’s killing and sniping and ethnically cleansing moderates and those who want a moderate peaceful country, in Syria, with multiple ethnicities. As Israel does. Because Russia wants any opposition to Iran to not be US backed.
At this point the Sunnis surprised Obama the Kremlin and Tehran with their independent will and potential, and IS is mostly a big boy now. However, still perfectly achieving Syrian/Kremlin goals to keep the US from arming anyone against Assad. The evidence for my case is very strong.
There are other reasons Iran created ISIS, besides the actual evidence that they did in fact create ISIS. Hezbolleh signed an agreement with the UN that it was not allowed to re-arm after the war with Israel. Hezbolleh needed (and the Kremlin needed to provide it) a real good reason to expose the open lie that the UN was facilitating Hezbolleh’s re-arming because of the UN’s irrational superstitious antisemitism. ISIS gave the Kremlin and Hezbolleh/Iran just such an excuse. There is a ton of real evidence I can bring not just motivation.
Also, did you know Barack HUSSEIN Obama is a secret Muslim that was born in Kenya! It’s true. Plus he hates Jews. Obama is basically Hitler.
Poor Jews, they are the true conservatives you know. Jesus was a Jew!
Gotta go, Glenn Beck is on!
I looked up the name “Bikosky” in the list of Jewish surnames, and it appeared.
TheRealNews had a recent interview with Greenwald, the journalist that has been publishing Edward Snowden’s stuff. He mentioned that the intelligence services of the US and the UK consider Israel to be one of the major threats to both countries, yet, politically, America and England can’t kiss jew ass enough. They acknowledged it was about Jew moeny in politics – saying that Jews were the “ATM of American politics” – but Greenwald – being a jew himself, automatically tried to take the spotlight of of Jews so went on about Christian Zionists.
So Bikosky is one of the torturers in the CIA, she purposefully mislead Congress, and apparently still has her position. The entire “CIA Torture” scandal seems to be a proxy for 9/11. The torture was done *to get false confessions for 9/11*
That means Alfreda Fraces Bikosky was instrumental in covering up 9/11 and torturing people to get false confessions about it. If she is, in fact, a Jew, it gives us a pretty clear understanding of her motivations – to help her favorite country, Israel, and to cover up Israel and Jewish complicity in the 9/11 attacks. If she is a Jewess, it would go a long way to explaining why she tortured various Arabs and Muslims.
Jews are a security risk. Stereotypes exist for a reason – the stereotype that Jews have “dual loyalty” is accurate. Most Jews are loyal to Israel, the state and the tribe, and are hostile to the host countries. Since WWII, probably a majority of major spy scandals have been Jews selling out America, first to the USSR, then to the apartheid regime of Jew bigotry in Zionist-occupied Palestine.
The CIA has a long-standing suspicion of Jewish traitors, for damn good reason.
Jews should not be given security clearances. The best way to fight terrorism is to never trust a Jew with sensitive information, as they are culturally predisposed towards treason.
So I just chanced onto a blog by some MSNBC-tard “progressive,” reasonablyliberal, and made a throw away post about his support for “immigration reform.” I said essentially it shows that he’s not “progressive” at all, merely anti-white. The “immigrants” he wants to import to America are the opposite of “progressive” – they are peoples that have created cultures based around the opposite of “progressive” values – no freedom of speech, a low status for women, fanatically “homophobic.” Yet these progressive *cheer* the idea of America becoming less white, even though it will make America less “progressive.”
How to explain this is very simple and something most White Nationalists know – they are not “progressive” – they are simply anti-white.
Of course, the MSNBC-tard assumed that I must be a Republican, that I must be a conservative, and oddly accused me of voting for Bush because I opposed Obama’s war-mongering. To the MSNBC-tards of the world, anyone who isn’t on their side just *MUST* be a FOX-tard, they must be some Bible-thumping, homo-hating “racist” “sexist” conservative. Of course, the MSNBC-tards are never quite sure if their opponents are toothless hillybilly Ku-Klux-Klansman or wealthy CEOs lighting their cigars with hundred dollar bill appropriated from the working class.
So the MSNBC-tard took a look at my blog trying to sniff out some “racism” “sexism” and “homophobia” – never quite sure what the settle on, but what he did finally settle on is very, very revealing. I’m guessing he read some of the many entries about the CIA and then proceeded to describe how evil the Republicans are due to the Abu Ghraib torture scandal, and then assumed I must approve of this.
In fact, he seemed to have noticed a lot of the BDSM-themed stories, so assumed that I am a “pervert” – into that kinky sex shit – so I probably get off on Abu Ghraib. In that sense, he’s just like LibertyLamp, the “anti-fascist” who basically called me a “faggot” and compared me to a transsexual – in other words, the “anti-hate activist” LibertyLamp used homophobia, transphobia … and MISOGYNY – to attack me.
The reason these types find “hate” everywhere is simply because *they are motivated by hate* – pure, raw hatred.
ReasonablyLiberal’s references to Abu Ghraib were odd, of course, because anyone who has read this blog for any length of time has noticed that I have talked about Abu Ghraib quite a bit, along with many many articles detailing the CIA’s long history of horrific human rights abuses. But it is no surprise – not a surprise at all – that he tried to label me as a supporter of torture because of the 50 Shades of Grey style sex stories. Just like LibertyLamp’s homophobic, transphobic, and misogynists slurs against me reveal something about herself, so ReasonablyLiberal’s desperate attempts to paint me as a hater reveals something about himself.
What this all boils down to – all these issues – is that of *power* – who has it and what they do with it. I’ve written many, many times about feminism and how intimately related feminism is to BDSM, how women who are attracted to feminism are very often into some very hard-core BDSM. White Nationalists also need to realize that their “progressive” opponents pose as morally superior because they believe – or pretend to believe – that they are powerless, that the people in America who have power are Whites. White have “privilege” because they are powerful. Blacks and Mestizos are “righteous” because they are powerless.
This is simply slave-morality as described by Nietzsche, of course. As Mindweapon once said, Liberalism is just Christianity with AIDS, once Christianity is stripped of the spiritual, once the Beatitudes – blessed are the meek, blessed are the poor – are taken out of their religious context and secularized, they become just assertions of moral superiority based on weakness.
This leads to the hilarious pretension that Ashkenazi Jews – a white skinned, ethno-centrist ethnic group that happens to be the wealthiest and most powerful white skinned group in America – are actually “oppressed.” Who is oppressing Jews – the Jews that dominate the media, are well entrenched in Wall Street, have well funded political lobbies like the SPLC and the ADL – who could possibly oppress these people, the most powerful – not to mention perceived to be white – group in America?
Why, neo-Nazis of course. But where are these “neo-Nazis?”
They don’t actually exist. Other than some internet trolls on websites like 4Chan or the Daily Stormer – neo-Nazis DO NOT EXIST.
Just as Steve Sailer said, the only thing that holds the “progressive” coalition together is “KKK-razy glue” – they have to pretend that the Evil White Oppressors – KKK-Nazis – exist so they can all band together and fight against them. When it becomes clear that the KKK and neo-Nazis DO NOT EXIST, all of a sudden the anti-white coalition falls apart.
Progressives support gay marriage – yet Blacks, the Democrat party’s strongest voting block – is hilariously “homophobic.” “Gay” “marriage” was defeated in California because of the black vote. Progressives support “women’s rights” – yet the culture of Mestizos is hilariously patriarchal and sexist – the exact opposite of feminism. It’s a source of pure comedy now to read feminists on twitter, as the uber-White lesbian folk singers of the Lilith Fair set are attacked as “racist” by Black Feminists (#solidarityisforwhitewomen.) “Progressives” believe Jews to be a Holy Victim class, yet the Catholic Mestizos they want to replace white people with are actually, superstitiously, anti-semitic, and American Jews, far from being victims, are racist oppressors who fund and provide political cover as the Israelis ethnically cleanse the Palestinians.
Without the ghost of not-actually-existing KKK-Nazis, the whole “progressive” coalition falls apart, because they don’t have any enemies, they are not, in fact, victims at all, they *are the ruling class they oppose.* One only has to remember the cries of “anti-semitism” over Occupy Wall Street – Occupy Wall Street, a movement *started by progressive Jews* against the “1%” accidentally revealed a truth you’re never supposed to notice, the “1%” that owns Wall Street – they are Jewish progressives.
THEY ARE THE RULING CLASS.
Now, what does this have to do with BDSM and spanking? Quite a bit, actually. BDSM is all about “power” and they even call it “power exchange.”
And politics is about power.
A while back the DailyStormer did a very interesting article about Holocaust films, and how Holocaust mythology has often – almost always – included an element of BDSM. The earliest Holocaust novels were barely this side of porn – one remembers the hilarious “masturbation machines” that a Jew claimed the Nazis used on him. In Israel, BDSM-themed Holocaust porn is a huge industry, imagery of Jewish men tied up and flogged by Nazi Dominatrixes – the She-Wolf of the SS.
The film “Salo” – essentially a homosexual porn film – was sold as “art” because it was a “deconstruction” of “fascist sexuality.” The “need to dominate” was integral to the “Nazi character” and Germans, Europeans in general, and Catholics – in other words, anyone who opposed Communism – were a bunch of “degenerate perverts” that were driven by their “perverted sexual kink.” The modern film Pan’s Labyrinth is a non-pornographic version of the same thing, the Nazis in that case being replaced by Franco’s Fascists, the victims Spanish Republicans – and Jews, of course. Of course, the film shows the Fascist character sexually aroused by torturing his victims.
Now, in case you think I’m stretching the analogy, not too long ago professional anti-White Jew Tim Wise said that it was time for the “former slaves” to take power, and he even used a very telling illustration. He said it was time for the traditionally “oppressed” to “take up the whip” against their former “oppressors.”
In BDSM, that’s called “The Switch” and if you will permit me just a bit of leeway, you will find that understanding this dynamic reveals quite a bit about the nature of anti-whites. In this case, the Blacks, Mestizoes, and Asians are incidental, their anti-whiteness is simply ethnocentrism and racist hate. Blacks, Mestizoes, and Asians are simply normal, ethnocentric people.
The anti-Whites in question are the Ashkenazi Jews and White “ethno-masoscists” and it is those anti-Whites that this analysis is about.
I’m a mod on a section of Reddit called “Break Feminazis,” which is described as a “fantasy BDSM themed subreddit about Sexist Misogynists fighting a Gender War against Feminists, defeating them and turning them into sex slaves.” It’s pretty hokey and the porn imagery is kind of disgusting to me personally, but the narratives are often half-sexy and half-funny, and I participate because every once in a while we get a “live one.”
The “live one” is usually some young “feminist” woman who goes off about the horrible evil misogynists who make a fetish out of humiliating feminists. It doesn’t take too long for them to admit that, while yes, they do find these BDSM stories erotic as hell – they quite often masturbate to them – they like to add an ending. At the end of the hot sex fantasy where they are forced into humiliating sexual submission, they “turn the tables” on the Sexist Misogynists and “take up the whip,” as it were, against their former oppressors.
TO BE CONTINUED
A disclaimer: there are a number of people – men and women – in the White Nationalist movement obsessed with “sexual degeneracy,” pornography, and have a real hang up about BDSM. The women who claim they are disgusted by BDSM are pretty much the same as men who go on long tirades about “fags” – someone is protesting too much. The regular men, married husbands, who rant about 50 Shades of Grey being degenerate are almost certainly in denial about their own wives’ sexuality. I know this, because I’m quite familiar with the kind of women who don’t “get it” at home – so they go to professional Doms who will, in fact, give it to them.
It’s probably best if you don’t ask how I know, just take my word for it.