Tag Archives: music

Gender Critical

I have a morbid fascination with the Gender Critical reddit forum. It’s a “radical feminist” forum, and many on reddit consider it a “hate sub.”

It really is just the female version of the “Red Pill” or the “Men’s Rights Activists” or even the “Incels.” They pretty openly hate men, and admit it in a way that the “misogynist” subs would never admit they hate women.

Many on reddit do label Gender Critical a “hate” sub, but not because they hate men – because they don’t consider “transgendered” men women. They refuse to accept the propaganda phrase “Trans women are women.”

Of course, it’s obvious that “trans women are women” is false. If it were true it wouldn’t need the “thought terminating cliche.” “Trans women” are just men wearing dresses. Those that undergo “sex reassignment surgery” are still men, just mutilated men, men with enhanced circumcision that have been poisoned with artificial estrogen – just like Alex Jones’ Gay Frogs, in fact. (OMG – ALEX JONES WAS RIGHT!)

I just can’t help but feel some sympathy for these women. They are right about “transgendered.” They are right about men’s “objectification” of women. AFAIK, homosexual men “objectify” men. It’s just testosterone.

So these women hating men for male biology really are the equivalent of men hating women for female biology.

The Gender Critics are also mostly correct about “gender” too. “Sex” is a biological reality, “gender” is a social construct. There is nothing “natural” about women wearing skirts – see Scottish kilts. There is nothing “natural” about women shaving their armpits or men having short hair. As someone once posted here, sex roles are not entirely socially “constructed” – instead they are socially reinforced.

Only women can nurse babies, so child care is basically a woman’s job – due to biology. Of course, men can take care of children – historically, men took charge or raising boys at about the age of 7. But child care is a woman’s job precisely because of the biology involved – and only ideological fanatics would object to that.

Ironically, it’s precisely at this point that the Gender Critical Feminists become the biology-deniers they rightly criticize the “transgenders” for.

What draws these women to radical feminism? Some perfectly legitimate objections to prostitution/pornography. But also some illegitimate reasons – such as their shallow hatred of men and their obvious agenda to recruit straight women to lesbianism. Lots of them utterly whine about being “invisible” to men as they age – apparently, they DEMAND male sexual attention, until they get it, then they complain about “objectification” – then when they don’t get it anymore, they complain about “invisibility.”

As they say, women want “fried ice.”

Occasionally, they will step right to the edge of racial reality – they hate men of color too – but they quickly correct themselves.

https://reddit.com/r/gendercritical

The Explicit Whiteness of Goth

There is some anti-white troll on AltRight.com that calls himself “Gothic Joe” and is supposedly into the “goth scene.” Me, personally, I’m not into the “goth scene” and never have been, although I do like some of the music and music that is closely related, like industrial.

But I do have to admit I’ve had a long kind of fascination with and obsession with “goth chicks.”

I just like the style – the “Suicide Girl” thing. I totally have the hots for women who dress up in “Dominatrix” types outfits. No, I’m not at all a “sub” and don’t get off to being “topped” by a Dominatrix – my sexuality tends to go the opposite direction, to be blunt. Watching the dominatrix slowly yield and turn into a submissive puppy is really, really hot.

I just like the boots, the leather, the little, subtle “restraints” that they wear. And the more these goth chicks dress up like Dommes, the more you know they are total submissives in private.

There is of course a HUGE element of BDSM in the “goth scene” – they are practically synonymous in many people’s minds. Goth tends to be a place where suburban girls can sort of “experiment” with BDSM fashion – and sex – while just making it a sort of “style” and “play.”

Probably the two biggest “goth” acts that went mainstream in the last 20 years were Nine Inch Nails (great) and Marilyn Manson (lame.) Both acts filled their videos and stage shows with hints of BDSM. Marilyn Manson’s video for his cover of “Tainted Love” (ironically, a Motown song by a Black woman that was also covered by the White “New Wave” band Soft Cell in the 1980s, an exception that proves the rule) was a pretty good short film full of that sort of style with plenty of suburban degeneracy – and it was full out “racist” too, Manson’s “goth thugs” were the “alphas” over the Blacks and Wiggers and White preppies – and turned the Cheerleader into a Suicide Girl at the end. It’s cute, not to be taken seriously, but still kind of cute.

Anyway I got into it with “Gothic Joe” by pointing out just how WHITE the goth scene is. Like all “alternative” subculture scenes, it’s a way for White people to SEGREGATE themselves from mainstream integrated society. Consider the original “alternative” scene of the 1990s. The mainstream pop music at the time was heavily dominated by Black artists – Prince, Michael Jackson, and a host of black and brown women “divas.” Even the metal scene, long a bastion of uber-whiteness, had started incorporating hip hop and featuring Black lead singers.

Then along comes “grunge” – the Whitest of the White – based on bands in uber-White Seattle. What distinguished “grunge” music like Nirvana and Pearl Jam from the mainstream pop music of the time?

The complete, 100% absence of ANY black musical influence. Grunge even took it farther by cutting out the guitar solos lest there be any hint of even a light skinned, white presetning Black guitar hero like Jimi Hendrix!

I was at the very first Lollapolloza in the 1990s – I think the only Black person at the entire festival was the lead singer of Living Color.

Goth is much the same way. One of the earliest and most influential “goth” bands was England’s Bauhaus. Look at the band, watch their videos, listen to their music. It’s whiter than white. Over the top theatrical even, lots of references to theater culture – another bastion of whiteness.

If you go to any major city in America and want to go out dancing, and you want to be sure the scene will be 99.99% White people? Go to the goth nightclub. Because the scene is so White, the women feel much safer to go all out, dress really sexy, get drunk and be exhibitionist. They do NOT feel as safe in a mixed race environment. Of course no one will admit it – they will all point to the single token Black goth – likely gay, thus not a threat to the women. But everyone knows the deal.

Also, the goth scene tends to be very Catholic I’ve noticed, and had goth friends say the same thing to me. Goth’s “dark” and even “satanic” image is really just based on the darker side of Catholicism itself. Of course even the name is based on the architectural style of old Catholic cathedrals. Yes, there’s a certain kind of pagan element to it, but it’s the same pagan element embedded in Catholicism itself. So that means the goth scene is also relatively kosher-free (hint, hint.)

I’m pro-White and of course support White people having our own cultural spaces where we are free to be us, express our own inner selves and our own culture. Goth is rather silly and often pretty goofy – but it is sincerely white.

Creeping up the backstairs
Slinking into dark stalls
Shapeless and slumped in bath chairs
Furtive eyes peep out of holes

She has many guises
She’ll do what you want her to
Playing dead and sweet submission
Cracks the whip deadpan on cue

Reeking like a pigsty
Peeling back and gagging free
Flaccid ego in your hand
Chokes on dry tears, can you understand?

She’s jeering at the shadows
Sneering behind a smile
Lunge and thrust to pout and pucker
Into the face of the beguiled

Peek-a-boo
Peek-a-boo
Peek-a-boo (Golly jeepers)
Peek-a-boo (Where’d you get those peepers?)
Peek-a-boo (Peepshow, creepshow)
Peek-a-boo (Where did you get those eyes?)
Strobe lights pump and flicker
Dry lips crack out for more
Come bite …

Women Wear Makeup And Sexy Clothes Because Men Play Hard To Get

http://www.unz.com/isteve/emily-lindin-is-right/

I know it may be an unpopular opinion here, but if women have been dressing to attract men in one way or another for the last couple hundred years in western civilization, it’s because they find the men hard to attract. If it was easy, they wouldn’t go through all the bother. If all women took off their makeup and dressed in average clothes, only a small percentage would be considered good-looking by men. Women did not dress in a fashion to sexually attract men back in the day of the arranged marriage. They used to dress more modestly back in the Middle Ages and in previous times. They only started really dressing up once they were expected to find their mates themselves because they felt it wouldn’t work otherwise.

The goal isn’t just to attract a man’s eyes, it’s to get him to make a commitment to marriage. The latter has always been hard for woman. Before the modern era, young people went through a long engagement to find out whether they were compatible or not, and engagements were still broken right and left in those days. In this era, plenty of men refuse to marry or have kids if they can get sex for free without a commitment. The financial investment women make in trying to get a commitment out of a man has always been huge in proportion to her income, when you add in the amount of money spent on clothes, jewelry, hair, and makeup, much of it purchased on a young girl’s working salary, which is never that high at any sort of starter job. In the days of the arranged marriage, many men would refuse to commit if it wasn’t for a financial sum given to him provided by her family, which was called a dowry. Marriage has always been harder for women to achieve than a lot of men understand.

— “Anon”

Thoughts?

Don’t make me sing this part of the song,
The lyrics are so bad, so we’re going to skip ahead
To the single ladies part instead…

— Nataly Dawn, Pomplamoose, “Single Ladies”

Which Way, White Man?

https://infogalactic.com/info/The_Kallikak_Family

The Kallikak Family: A Study in the Heredity of Feeble-Mindedness was a 1912 book by the American psychologist and eugenicist Henry H. Goddard. The work was an extended case study of Goddard’s for the inheritance of “feeble-mindedness,” a general category referring to a variety of mental disabilities including mental retardation, learning disabilities, and mental illness. Goddard concluded that a variety of mental traits were hereditary and society should limit reproduction by people possessing these traits.

The Truth About Pizzagate, Pedophiles, and Sex Cults

Clicking around I wound up on the ISGP again and read their breakdown/debunking of “Pizzagate:”

https://isgp-studies.com/pizzagate

While they debunk the particulars of “Pizzagate” and suggest it was a partisan psy-op against the Clinton campaign (very likely) they do not discount the notion of high level “sex cults” which may include pedophilia, torture, and perhaps even actual murder.

It seems quite likely that such “elite” cults do, in fact, exist. But the “conspiracy theories” of such cults are likely an example of regular people displacing their own demons, as it were, on the elites.

People are greedy; greed is one of the 7 deadly sins. Average normal people are greedy, but their greed is small, because their lives are small. Therefore it’s normal and understandable. The rich, the Wall Street elites, they are greedy too, but of course their greed is much larger in scope, much more flashy, much more ostentatious.

As no less than Adolph Hitler pointed out about Communist propaganda: people might be skeptical of a little lie, because in their lives they tell little lies all the time. But they wouldn’t imagine telling big lies – lies as big as the Communists told – because those aren’t the kind of little lies they tell in their own lives.

There’s an amusing song by country singer Hank Williams called “Naked Women and Beer.” Some of the lyrics:

Now we have got some strange laws
The most hypocritical thing around these days
Cause where I live in Tennessee
Why an auto parts calander
Hey thats pornography
But go right down the road, read what the sign says

Naked women and beer
We got it all in here
For your eyes and your ears
They show it all in the clear
Way up north and down south
Whoo, somebody shut my mouth

If you want to find a “cult” that engages in public sexual acts, where women’s youth is fetishized, women wearing schoolgirl outfits, something that may even include a little “kink” and a little S&M?

You don’t have to look to the wealthy elites in Manhattan and London. Just go to any suburb anywhere in America and go to your local, working and middle class strip club. It’s all there.

Exploitation of youth? Strippers are at the height of their demand the day after their 18th birthday – that’s a teenager. Child molestation? What kind of girls become strippers and porn stars anyway? The stereotype is that they were molested, likely by their father, step-father, or an uncle. Stereotypes exist for a reason.

Some women may claim to have been sexually absued by a powerful cult of politicians, “high society” men, and elites – but the more likely case is that it was men of their own class, their own social circles, and their own families.

But it’s comforting for people to project such things on far away “elites.” Their sex clubs are likely cleaner with better lighting, and the participants better dressed, not the run down strip club in a warehouse district on the wrong side of town.

But isn’t the substance the same?

The feminists in the 1960s and 1970s rebelled against beauty pageants, complaining that women were lined up “like cattle” their bodies judged on their “parts” like a side of beef. Weren’t they right? Isn’t that exactly how it operates? Feminists complain that men “objectify” women’s bodies – isn’t that true? The neurology shows that men’s brains light up in the same places when looking at women as they do when contemplating … power tools. They are literally thinking about them objectively and how they will “use” them, as tools, for a specific end.

Traditional societies have always understood this, and Western societies in particular have always understood this, which is why sex was deemed a private affair, why monogamy was encouraged, why boys and girls were raised separately, why segregation of the sexes was the rule, and pornography and sexual imagery was forbidden. Why women and girls were to dress modestly, so as not to tempt men and boys.

When I was young the murder of Jon Benet Ramsey, a little six year old girl, was the tabloid story of the year. What made the story so salacious is that her parents – an upper class family active in local GOP party politics – had entered her in “baby beauty pageants” which were considered by most to over-sexualize little girls. Yet the participants – the mothers, usually – seemed to be fine with this and encouraged and/or forced their daughters – children – to participate.

In 2017, the Current Year, more conservative leaning mothers are constantly complaining that they can’t even go to the mall and find modest apparel for the daughters, even daughters many years away from puberty. And anyone who has ever known a teenage girl going through puberty knows that you essentially have to FORCE them to wear modest attire, because they want nothing more than to show off their new bodies and get the attention of boys, and men. Men objectify, and women want to be objectified. It starts the summer boys start growing body hair and girls get their periods.

The sexual revolutionaries were completely correct that there was a “double face” regarding sex, that underneath the pleasant and modest public faces humans are a cauldron of sexuality. But there was no hypocrisy here, the public and private spheres were kept separate precisely because of the power of sex.

“Liberals” love to complain that American TV shows a lot of violence but won’t allow a woman’s bare breast on TV. But those differing standards for sex and violence exist for a reason. Little boys will start play fighting as toddlers – and that play fighting can turn to real fighting at the drop of a hat. Boys are taught to control their violent urges from childhood on – we use sports as a way for boys to channel their violent and competitive urges in a safe and socially constructive way.

We put our daughters in ballet, gymnastics, and dance classes to channel their own sexual – and competitive – urges in a safe and socially constructive way. We try to postpone sexual maturity for our children as long as possible so their brains have a chance to catch up to their bodies. There is nothing hypocritical about this – it’s the basis of civilization. It’s what makes us different than animals. The evolutionary reason that human babies are helpless at birth is so mothers can pass a child through their birth canals while the baby’s head is still small – child bearing is painful enough as it is. This allows humans to develop bigger skulls that house bigger brains.

Of course “the elites” engage in “Eyes Wide Shut” style sexual parties. Of course the elites recruit young girls – very young girls, teenage girls – as sexual objects and sexual playthings. It’s not because they are elites – it’s because they are humans. Average regular middle and working class men do the same thing when they have a chance – and average, regular middle and working class women fantasize about being those sexual objects and sexual playthings.

And of course, quite often, these normal sexual dynamics are sometimes perverted into the fetishization of youth and the sexualization of violence. In BDSM it is called “power exchange” because – just like electrical current – the potential difference is what makes the electricity flow, the potential difference is what causes electrical current – just like the power difference between men and women is that spark and the charge of sexuality. The fact that a man is so much stronger than a woman is what women find sexually appealing in men. The fact that a woman is so much more vulnerable – and delicate – than a man is what men find sexually appealing in a woman. S&M is just that dynamic with the addition of costumes and props.

But when one class is much higher on the power scale than another class, the inevitable happens – instead of companionate marriage, the powerful men use the women of the oppressed class as concubines. The moronic “right wingers” who are constantly opposing “egalitarianism” will simply or ignore or excuse this. When a King of England did NOT have mistresses, his subjects assumed he was a sodomite. Where does socially conservative monogamy go when the elite class uses the women of the lower classes as, essentially, sex slaves? That is how you get a degenerate elite. That is how you get – in 2002 Italy, in fact, when Burlesconi was President – poor men pimping their underage daughters off to lecherous old wealthy men. That is how a girl’s youth becomes a product to sell, a way to feed the family.

Is that was the “anti-egalitarians” want? Which NRx “neo-reactionary” “social conservative” father is the first to auction his teenage daughter’s virginity off to the “God Emperor King” because “monarchy is better than democracy?” Which “conservative right wing” man is going to hold his shoes while walking around the castle as the King gets first night privileges with his new bride?

All of a sudden “all men are created equal” has something to recommend it, yes? All of a sudden the idea that the law binds both the rich and the poor, the powerful and the powerless, has a certain logic behind it, does it not? If that is not what right wing religious people mean by “objective morality” than what good are they? If the gods are not just, why worship them?

The origin of sex cults, pedophilia, prostitution, sexual exploitation, and the fetishization of youth is when there is TOO MUCH INEQUALITY. When societies are divided among the powerful and the powerless. In fact, one of the reason we need to have mono-racial societies – even mono-ethnic societies – is precisely because races, ethnicities, and individuals are NOT, by nature, equal. So separating these unequal humans into their own tribes where there is some semblance of a rough equality is the only way to protect your daughters from sex cults, pedophiles, and pimps.

Equality is what makes your daughter a wife, not a whore. Racially homogeneous – and roughly egalitarian – societies are what gives your daughter the chance at being a respected mother as opposed to a disposable concubine. It’s what allows your son to have an exclusive wife and not another man’s sloppy seconds.

And it’s what allows your grandchildren to be citizens, not slaves; heirs, not bastards, patriarchs, not cannon fodder.

Boogie Nights Wonderland Scene

Why the scene works so well:

1. The music is so loud you can barely hear people talking – that’s realism. Druggies always play music too loud and tend to ruin their hearing early on, the loud concerts etc.

2. The actors all really look like they’ve been doing coke all the time for weeks, or months, or years.

3. Drug dealers are always paranoid, for obvious reason. When you are in an illegal trade, you obviously can’t go to the police – the state. The state has the monopoly on legitimate violence, that’s why they are the state. So the guys selling the fake coke know if they get caught, there’s violence. They know the drug dealers have guns.

4. Druggies and guns. There is ALWAYS one guy. He’s on some kind of drug and that’s when he wants to show you his gun. You never can tell if he’s literally just a fetishist, if he is just showing off, like he might want to show you his car, or if it’s an implied threat. You haven’t lived until you’ve had a gun pointed at you, even “in jest.” You’ve never known fear until you’ve had a gun pointed at you, “in jest,” by someone you know is wired on something or other. So it’s more realism.

5. Markey Mark staring into space for 50 seconds – that moment of self-realization when he figures out he’s in actual physical danger. But it’s like 50/50 – there is a good chance everything will be fine if you just play it cool but one misinterpreted signal and it all goes to hell. You see this when the guy first makes the threat and Markey Mark tells him his friend is just crazy, the dealer says “hey” and waves his hand, waving the issue away – while of course you know that he’s pacing himself to know when to reach for his gun in the box.

6. When Crazy Guy start crying when he realizes “it’s on.” The violence has begun, and there’s no going back, no way to brush it off as just a misunderstanding now.

7. The cheesy early 80s music, Sister Christian, Jesse’s Girl, and 99 Red Balloons, imparts the real feel of the early 80s and the juxtaposition of the tense scene and the cheesy music. Boogie Nights has always been compared to Goodfellas and this scene is probably the closest other than the Steadicam party scene.

Are Blacks The Only People That Still Believe In The Devil?

It’s a terrible remix of one of the greatest rock and roll songs of all times. The little mini-film itself is ruined by the fact that it keeps cutting to some random Black guy, presumably a rapper or DJ, for no apparent reason.

But if you could take the mini-film and put it to the original Sympathy for the Devil song, it would make one of the best old fashioned MTV music videos of all time.

It’s classic Christianity but from a Black/People of Color perspective. Let’s go through the symbolism:

1. The Devil is a curly haired, snarl-lipped Jew.

2. The first temptation – nice Preppy Church Black girl is dating Hipster Christian White boy, the devil turns into a sexy Barrio Mestizo and she can’t help herself. The Black actress and the video editor do a great job here, she can’t help putting the straw in her mouth and pursing her lips, then catches herself and gives a “nice girl” smile to White Hipster boy before he realizes she’s flirting behind his back.

3. Second temptation: Usury. Nice, trying to be responsible Black guy is about to settle for the affordable but reliable car, until the car salesman offers him a loan – at interest of course – so he can get himself in a pimpin’ ride.

4. Respectable White nerdy businessman puts his wedding ring in his pocket to follow in the young Russian-looking stripper – bonus points for the Devil turning into the sexy woman, adds a whole new level of evil – then the Devil slips the wedding ring out of the man’s pocket while he’s in the throes of sexual arousal. We can see him distraught as he realizes what he’s done.

5. The Devil turns into a Mexican drug lord and delivers a briefcase full of money to the old White politician. In another excellent edit, you can see the respectable light-skinned Hispanic businessman looking embarrassed and uncomfortable with his racial/ethnic counterpart walks in the room clearly fulfilling the stereotype. The young Irish politician, Fanning, sees the older politician taking the money, smiles with almost innocent realization that this is just “how it’s done” and shakes hands with the devil to step in line as the new politician backed by drug kingpins.

This is all very classic Christian and it’s also great folk art (the video, not the shitty remix.)

Now compare and contrast what Whites put out: shitty derivative “Satanic heavy metal” that is essentially easy listening Musak compared to, say, AC/DC, and not even as transgressive as a classic song like Highway to Hell was way back in the 1970s.

Scandinavian Black Metal has actually put out “Satanic” music that is far less scandalous than the actual Catholic Church they are trying to parody. Even with a chorus singing “Hail Satan” it doesn’t have the deep sense of dread that the Neptunes video has. While adultery, temptation, usury and drug gangs are real evils – real Satanism – even the censored titties of the Ghost video aren’t sexy, much less scandalous, and the black and white horror “goth” style video as a stand-in for evil was kind of hokey way back during the hey days of horror. Omen little Antichrist boy was creepy, but in Ghost’s video it’s just a symbol, just a stand in. Young innocent-looking European children juxtaposed with some weather and gothic cathedrals = creepy Satanic music?

Even Ghost’s Tried-And-True attempt at the old formula is more self-parody than anything genuinely creepy, more 80s satan-schlock than real horror. So, super-pretty teenage girl on the cusp of sexuality is sort of “goth” and “misunderstood” so hold hands with the devil who is the only one that understands her, and she the only one that understands him. It’s West Side Story plus the Addam’s Family.

White people can’t be convincingly scary anymore because they stopped believing in Satan.

@Colin Liddell & the Elephant’s Trunk: No Woman Wants to be a “Generic Mother”

The fact that the “Alt Right” doesn’t get about women and fertility: they believe it is natural for women to “want to have babies” and think that feminism is convincing women to not have babies.

https://alternative-right.blogspot.com/2017/06/the-elephants-trunk-feminist-parable.html

But women do not get pregnant by immaculate conception, and they don’t have a “generic” baby when they reach puberty. Women have the baby of a specific man, and especially when they have a boy, they think of the boy as a small version of the father.

The Alt Right should stop thinking of women and natalism in the abstract and start thinking of it in the specific. All the beta boys who complain about women “in the movement” who are making videos instead of staying at home raising a family are just the flip side of the “nice guy” betas, just instead of being “nice” and a “white knight” they are engaging in “aggressive verbal topping” – instead of saying, “M’Lady” and kissing their hand, they are saying, “get your ass in my kitchen” and slapping their butt. But it comes from the same place (and is often more effective.)

As anyone in the manosphere knows – and as anyone who grew up in an intact family or even had an older brother who dated real women knows – holding women to a high standard is far more effective than holding them to a low standard.

So the next time one of the beta boys sees a fertile women not having children, the question shouldn’t be “why aren’t you having babies” – the question should be, “which White man’s babies are you going to be having and when?

If they don’t know the answer, ask the men which one wants her.

No woman wants to be a “generic” mother to a “generic” kid barefoot and pregnant by some “generic” man in a “generic” kitchen. But add in specifics and she’ll generally be fine with it.

When feminists or just normal women complain that they don’t want to be “just” barefoot and pregnant, they are reacting to the idea that they are a generic, undifferentiated baby factory. Women think in narratives, and you can’t have a romance without a leading man. So stop focusing on putting women “in their place” and instead focus on find a man with a place for them.

It seems like years since you held the baby
While I wrecked the bedroom
You said it was dangerous after Sunday
And I knew you loved me
He thinks I just became famous
And that’s what messed me up
But he’s wrong
How could I possibly know what I want
When I was only twenty-one?
And there’s millions of people
To offer advice and say how I should be
But they’re twisted and they will never be
Any influence on me
But you will always be
You will always be
If I treated you mean
I really didn’t mean to
But you know how it is
And how a pregnancy can change you
I see plenty of clothes that I like
But I won’t go anywhere nice for a while
All I want to do is just sit here
And write it all down and rest for a while
I can’t bear to be in another city
One where you are not