Tag Archives: nrx

President Donald J Hector Elizando Mountain Dew Camacho Trump

B:

Trump has two handicaps.

1) He is a bozo.
2) He started off with a default 7th grade civics class understanding of how the government works. Meaning, “Mr. Bill goes to Washington,” three branches, the President rules the Executive.

He is not a wild eyed radical, and does not intend to have a coup, abolish the constitution or anything of the sort. He got elected on the premise that the government is an organization which is dysfunctional but basically looks like what it’s supposed to. He got in on the theory that he would be a CEO in charge of revamping a broken corporation, or the captain of a ship which was off course and in bad repair.

Then he got in and all three branches told him to get bent, including the executive which he was supposed to be in charge of. Leaks and betrayal everywhere. It turned out that instead of being the captain of the ship, the president is actually just some dude who prances around on the prow, and if he gets ornery and actually tries to steer the ship and order the sailors around, they chuck him down in the hold. Which is where Trump now finds himself, fighting 1000 tons of pissed off squid.

None of this should have come as a surprise, but see point 1: the guy is a bozo, President Hector Elizando Mountain Dew Camacho.

He might still pull something out, if a group of reactionaries from the alphabet soup agencies and DoD present him with a plan and execute it for him. The odds of this are very small, for the same reason that the Soviet intelligence services and military never did anything against the USSR. This group of people has very little to gain and very much to lose by rocking the boat. They have comfortable and prestigious lives and interesting professions. DC incomes have not suffered at all from progressive policies. Anyone who is anyone in those organizations has been through many rounds of positive selection for conformism and many years of negative selection for nonconformism.

In short, those pics of the “God-emperor Trump” prancing around like a doofus with a submachine gun/sword and hookers at his knees should have been embarrassing to begin with.

But, hey, he might still pull something off-fundamentally, Trump is a decent and smart kind of bozo. Look at all those Jews he surrounds himself with! Just like President Camacho had his Not Sure and empowered him to fix the Brawndo Issue, maybe President Trump will delegate Kushner to figure out all this bad stuff with the french fry and burrito cover shortages. And maybe Kushner will take on Moldbug as an adviser.

One thing is for sure-these guys are not complete idiots. No NRx Nazis, NEETs or other weirdos will be allowed anywhere near power. Might as well leave all those Inquisition fantasies in the trash where they belong.

Jim:

Bozos do not acquire a hot wife, a flying palace with a gold plated bathroom, and the presidency in the face of massive opposition.

Trump knows exactly how the government really works, for he has been buying politicians for a very long time.

Trump is fairly open that he is planning a coup against the judiciary, after the fashion of Andrew Jackson, and has been planning it for many years. Of course what his supporters are hoping for is a coup against the permanent government, but a coup against the judiciary will nonetheless be a pleasant consolation prize.

Whether he can pull off a coup against the permanent government is far from clear, and I am less optimistic than I was a week ago, but he knows full well it is something he needs to do.

He has the military in his pocket, he has the praetorians in his pocket. The spies, however, are giving him a lot of grief, and if he cannot bring them into line, he is going to be a lame duck.

B:

A hot wife and a gold plated bathroom are EXACTLY the sort of things bozos value deeply and show off proudly. [Ed: President Camacho was a porn star with a big gold necklace let’s not forget!]

Would I really be surprised? The trouble with people of some intelligence is that they overestimate their intelligence while underestimating that of others. If I speak with you, it’s a pretty safe bet that I speak with others and have a pretty decent grasp of what’s going on.

Peppermint:

so “winning is for losers”. Are you impressed with GWB clearing brush and Jeb Bush’s wife?

B:

Your definition of winning is for losers. Idiocracy. I’ve been in Saddam Hussein’s palaces, was not impressed by them either.

I’m not impressed with GWB clearing brush.

I am impressed by George Senior, Prescott Bush and the rest of the classic Skull and Bones gang. Though evil, they had class, were formidable and not bozos.

I’m impressed by Andrew Jackson, who was formidable, though he fought a doomed battle. And I can’t picture Andrew Jackson doing bozo things like showing off a gold plated bathroom or trophy wives.

Furthermore, I know many people whom I look up to, who are my personal heroes in one respect or another, and none of them would do bozo things like that.

http://blog.jim.com/uncategorized/apology-to-b/

Jew Literally Buys His Way Into nRX/AltRight (#SocialMatter)

http://www.socialmatter.net/2016/08/29/ascending-tower-episode-xvii-part-1-gaslighting-christians/

Anthony, Nick, and E. Antony are joined by Ryan Landry and welcome special guest The Rebbe to talk about the second half of the Puritan-Judaism theory of Progressivism. In part 1, they cover Jewish perspectives on Christ, the ethnic divisions within modern Jewry, how nationalism saved Israel, and much more.

This episode is brought to you in part by generous donations from our listeners Anonymous in VA, The Bermudan Reactionary, Gladio, Edmund Burkenstock, and a special gift from our guest, The Rebbe.

The neo-reaction motto: Jews are to blame for nothing, Protestants are the blame for everything, White Nationalism is bad, and the solution to our problems is to LARP about restoring a monarchy. Just no racial solidarity or anti-semitism.

happy-merchant

nRX/SocialMatter’s Economic & Puritan Red Herrings

“Online religious arguments tend to be one secular agnostic pretending to be a traditional Catholic arguing with another secular agnostic pretending to be a fundamentalist Calvinist arguing with a third secular agnostic pretending to be a neo-pagan.” — Greg Johnson, paraphrased.

A famous nRX author recently mused, why are we refraining from teaching Catholicism just because we know it’s not true?

No, nRX is not a Jewish conspiracy to co-opt the “alt right” or reactionary thought.

Neoreaction is a Jewish Conspiracy to Thwart the Incipient National Socialist Revolution

NRX is a Catholic attempt to co-opt Jews into fighting the people the Catholics really hate: WASPs.

One would doubt that Moldbug “just happened” to downplay the Jewish role in the modern leftist/egalitarian movement, but it probably wasn’t because he had a Jewish grandfather. It’s simply that it’s not socially acceptable to blame anything on Jews, or to impute to Jews qua Jews anything other than the highest and loftiest motives.

But it’s open season on WASPs – whether religious or not.

So once the Catholics realized here was a chance to guard themselves from accusations of “anti-semitism” and even rope in a few “right wing” Jews, they coalesced around “neo-reaction.” The joke about Moldbug was right, he wants to reestablish the monarchy so he can fulfill his life-long ambition of being a court Jew.

But the Catholic NRXers are involved because they want to finally, once and for all, discredit the Reformation and the Enlightenment and to blame all modern problems on the movements that broke the power of their institution.

It depends on what problem you want to solve. If you’re a White Nationalist, you just have to reverse the consequence of the 1965 immigration act and curb Jewish media influence and anti-whiteness. But that is actually controversial, because it confronts the race issue head on and confronts Jewish power head on.

Catholic NRXers don’t want to do that, because it’s actually controversial and it won’t win them any libertarian Silicon Valley funding. It will turn off their Jewish friends. Since WASPs barely have any power left anyway, and don’t even identify as “WASPs” anymore, they are an easy target. The Democrats haven’t appointed a WASP to the Supreme Court in our lifetimes, and most WASPs these days are in the mold of Warren Buffett and Bill Gates – imperialist, globalist capitalists that are actually quite fine with IQ realism and hierarchy, as long as they can continue to make money and import cheap labor.

So the Catholic NRXers just want to relive their glory days (of 500 years ago) while avoiding anything actually controversial. That’s where all the “egalitarian” talk comes from. Not even the most hard core “egalitarian” liberal really buys the rhetoric – their neighborhoods are notoriously segregated and the more they “acknowledge their white privilege” the less they actually have to do anything about it.

But NRX wants us to believe that the progressive establishment – Bill Gates and Warren Buffet – really “believe” in equality and really believe that evolution only worked from the neck down. As opposed to the obvious facts: the establishment pays lip service to liberal ideas because it’s useful. Just like no one in nRX actually believes in Catholic dogma about miracles or transubstantiation, they just like the institution.

In order to keep Silicon Valley funding open, nRX is willing to give us howlers like these:

Do we dare imagine a nation where an open-heart surgeon takes home the same pay as a janitor? One job requires nearly a decade of dedicated study, an unwavering hand, a stout set of nerves, and the ability to think quickly lest a patient die; the other job requires a broom. What may be termed equality of outcome would certainly not be equality to the surgeon who spent his youth learning the scalpel when he could have just taken up a broom and gotten paid the same wage. Now multiply the scale of this nightmare by several orders of magnitude: a pharmaceutical chemist taking home the wages of a street sweeper; an electrical engineer receiving the same pay as a prostitute. Nothing could be more unequal. Nothing could be more unfair.

Of course, that is just a big fat red herring. No one who talks about “income equality” is suggesting that a janitor should be paid as much as a doctor. When people talk about “income equality” what they are clearly talking about is the fact that the top 1,000 billionaires on earth own more wealth than the rest of humanity combined. They are talking about the fact that the financial system – a financial system that is increasingly independent of the physical economy of goods and services – can create money out of thin air, and that creates virtually fictional derivatives that can’t and won’t be enforced when the time comes (see China defaulting on oil derivatives back in 2010.)

Why is everyone stuck on either the status quo, or Ron Paul-style goldbuggery? The Federal Reserve – and their counterparts in Europe and Asia – are just political constructs. No one cares that a brilliant doctor is going to make multiples of what a janitor makes. No one cares that an internet entrepreneur can become a billionaire.

What people care about is that “the masses” are taxed (in money and blood) so that oil pipelines overseas profit the right people. That whenever Wall Street can’t keep the fiction up, billions and trillions are simply transferred from the population at large so bankers can still get their bonuses.

It was always the conceit that putting fiat money under the control of democracy would lead to the population just printing themselves money, thus leading to inflation. So fiat money creation was put in the hands of technocratic financiers – and they did something virtually indistinguishable from a tin pot socialist dictator like Hugo Chavez – they just kept printing up money, non-stop, but instead of putting it into the economy they just diverted it into their bank accounts. So they could have their fifth mansion.

After all, you can have an economy of full employment when everyone is a servant of a king. One laborer to file each of the king’s toes – that’s ten jobs right there. Two or three servants to feed each of his dogs. Many biologists have suggested that humans are eusocial, after all.

But nRX is going to scare us that any talk of “equality” automatically leads to uppity janitors thinking they are Bill Gates while smart, hard working computer programmers are working for minimum wage, can’t get wives or have children, and we all turn into Bolivia.

But the nRX types want to avoid race and want to team up with their Jewish friends to blame everything on Puritans from two hundred years ago – because it’s 100% compatible with the ruling class to do that. You get no push back on that. You can still be invited to respectable cocktail parties – in fact, your “scandalous” “right wing” ideas can be tolerated, if not celebrated, because of course they are no threat to the actually powerful.

Gini And The Economic Altar

autistic-ai-overlord-jew-asian-aristocracy-homosexual-tranny-armed-forces-social

Mark Yuray: Doing Social Conservatism Right #nRX #SocialMatter

http://www.socialmatter.net/author/markyuray/

The problem with social conservatism is that is generally devolves into psuedo-Christian fundamentalism and/or some sort of “white knighting” ideal that men just aren’t being selfless enough. Social conservatism has typically been better at pointing to degeneracy and shrieking, “gross evil” (outrage porn) and much worse at actually setting a good example.

Yuray has done a great job explaining the importance of sexual morality, a great job of explaining the “Mannerbund” concept (I refer readers to my article three or so years ago that discussed many of the same concepts – even getting me coverage as an “Evil Misogynist” by the once-popular “male feminist” Manboobz.com.)

SocialMatter.net is the only “NRx” blog I’ve found that isn’t cringingly philo-semitic nor terrified of being more than implicitly pro-white. And Yuray is by far the best at SocialMatter.net.

Usually, when I hear someone discussing “culture” – I reach for my revolver. But I’ll make an exception for Yuray at SocialMatter.net.

Thank God For The Reformation And the Enlightenment

I’ve been reading and reading these neo-reactionary Dark Enlightenment people the last few weeks. Now, I realize that they are all super-duper smart – a self-described intellectual elite – and use big fancy words that some peon like me has a hard time understanding, but I promise I’m doing my best.

So, the Catholics are always bitching about the Reformation. Well, I’m Presbyterian. Frankly, Catholics are weird and gross and low class. Most of their institutions are bizarre. They worship a goddess – let’s be honest, that’s what Mariology is – their priests are crypto-homos, and the entire structure of the Catholic church is imperial.

The Protestant Reformation was in the North-Western part of Europe – you know, that part of Europe where the people are smarter, Whiter, and better looking. They were sick of being ruled by a bunch of dark skinned queers in Italy. So, they revolted and set up National Churches instead of a Imperial Church in Rome.

You know, nationalism.

And thank God they did. Catholicism is weird and gross, it’s an ignorant religion for dark skinned half-whites.

Presbyterianism is for White people.

I’ll write about the Enlightenment later.

Remember, these are people whose icons are those Magic the Gathering cards. The Dark Enlightenment is Dungeons and Dragons for adults.

So these Dork Enlightenners (they call White nationalists “racist” and don’t have the courage to actually promote White interests) – these people say they want to go back to before the Enlightenment.

Here’s how to start – get off the damn internet, which is a product of our post-Enlightenment world.

If NRx Wants To Revoke The Enlightenment, Do Jews Go Back To The Shtetl?

Of all NRx complaints about the Enlightenment, has the emancipation of the Jews ever been mentioned as a downside?

https://nickbsteves.wordpress.com/2015/04/25/this-week-in-reaction-20150424/

Watson, in Jews, Puritans and Whites OH MY!, catches Kevin McDonald pretty much agreeing with the neoreactionary dictum: “It’s not just the Jews.”

Is it really “it’s not just the Jews?” Or is it “it’s never the Jews?”

https://oneirradiatedwatson.wordpress.com/2015/04/23/jews-puritans-and-whites-oh-my/https://oneirradiatedwatson.wordpress.com/2015/04/23/jews-puritans-and-whites-oh-my/

Notice the tone, MacDonald is “caught,” “oh my!” As if MacDonald has never mentioned anything other than Jews. One of MacDonald’s most important pieces was “The Indigenous Culture of Critique.”

This sort of tone might be appropriate in a situation in which Jews are blamed for everything. But in modern America, and the West in general, Jews are blamed for nothing. In fact, it’s a signal of low social status to even notice that Jews have any power at all.

Jews run Hollywood? That’s a “conspiracy theory.” Jews overrepresented in politics? “So what, they work hard and are smarter than you, you’re just blaming your personal failure on Jews!” When Whites were overrepresented in the Ivy League, that was an example of structural racism. Now that Jews dominate the Ivy League, they got in all on merit?

NRx seems quite unwilling to critique Jews for anything at all, don’t they? If Jews caused problems in the 20th Century, we must go back further until we can blame it on some European group. “Sure Jews did this bad thing, but this other person did something bad too, so why blame Jews?”

Here nickbsteves engages in some extremely common philo-semitism:

Not only is it “Not just the Jews,” but, if it were they would truly be the master race psychologically speaking and would pretty much deserve, from an evolutionary perspective, all of the spoils they have obtained.

If we were talking about *any other group* – anyone at all *but* Jews, do you think nickbsteves would say the same thing?

One suspects that everything about the Enlightenment can be criticized *except* that it liberated the Jews.

It’s all very kosher isn’t it?

It would be a mistake to start “counting Jewish noses” in NRx, or pointing to Moldbug’s purported Jewish grandfather. There’s another dynamic at work here. I suspect it is similar to the allergy to ethno-nationalism and explicit advocacy for White interests and instead the focus on IQ. The idea is to create a coalition that includes just enough “diversity” – you know, Jews, White guys with half-Asian children, a smattering of Japanese and Sub-continentals – something that looks like Amren.

Instead of a biological continuum, it’s an artificial group – whoever gets X on the IQ tests.

You know, something that looks like Silicon Valley.

Because anything ELSE would actually draw the wrath of the Synagogue Cathedral.

They are just run of the mill conservatives giving themselves a fancy name and posing as great intellectuals.

NRx: Political Correctness for Right Wingers

You can see it especially in the reactionary Catholics.

Reactionary Catholics prove how “right wing” they are by using terms like “sodomite” and having the “courage” to say that homosexuality isn’t normal. In fact, they even like to point out that anal sex is not just gross, but spreads disease.

Everyone else keeps quiet and looks away uncomfortably because it’s pretty obvious what’s going on.

Yes, liberals do pretend that homosexuality is normal – obviously, no one believes it. Homosexuality is obviously gross and hey – the Pope is right – homosexuality is “intrinsically disordered.” It’s clearly some sort of developmental disorder, perhaps a hormonal issue. In fact, gay marriage is a modern attempt to contain homosexuality.

Before the modern era, gays would join the Catholic priesthood. After all – THAT IS YOUR TRADITION. What do you think “celibacy” is? It’s all the men that don’t want to marry women – you know, homos – so they join the celibate priesthood, put on a dress, run the fancy rituals in the Church, and otherwise keep their homosexuality in the crypto-closet.

The rest of us, we figured this out a long, long time ago.

But you know, those fags don’t always really keep chaste and they have a long, long tradition of buggering the altar boys.

So those altar boys grow up humiliated and ashamed about what their priests did to them, so they lash out about “sodomites” and build entire political movements around basic, obvious things that liberals – liberals being the smarter faction of society – already know and already figured out.

I’m sorry your priests anally raped you. It’s a crime. But you “NRx traditional Catholics” are just embarrassing yourselves at this point.

Hey Catholics, that IS YOUR TRADITION. That’s what you are fighting for. THAT IS YOUR CHURCH. That is your community. That is what “celibacy” means. Your priests are celibate, your nuns are celibate, your cardinals are celibate, the Pope is celibate.

The Priesthood IS gay marriage, and that is your tradition.

I’m reading a traditional Catholic “neo-reactionary” about how “Islam was the first Protestant reformation” and I’m thinking, yep, that’s right, Islam doesn’t have a fag priest class either, that’s pretty much just a Catholic thing.

That is what the Protestants were rebelling against. Luther and Calvin and every other proto-Protestant complained that “celibacy” led to “sodomy” because the celibate priesthood is just the “traditional” version of gay marriage.

I’m sorry, Father O’Malley shouldn’t have touched your there. Talk to your therapist.

OK, are we done? Good. Now please shut up and stop embarrassing yourself and everyone else.

Does Henry Dampier Read Hipster Racist?

He must, becaue I’ve been saying much of this for nearly two years now:

http://www.henrydampier.com/2015/04/explaining-pop-kink

Conservatives funnel their children into egalitarian institutions, demand inhuman powers of chastity from their children, and then become shocked — just shocked — when the impossible rules result in their cheerleader daughter getting a big belly without knowing who the father is. The absurdity of expecting inhuman levels of restraint from people is also mirrored by the leftist reign of regulations in sexual harassment. Men and women must be forced to be the same, and any outburst of natural attraction is to be punished by the full force of the legal system.

But the article is really about “pop kink” and as usual, he gets it wrong. I almost feel like I might accidentally come across as one of those obnoxious, politically correct Professional Kinksters talking about informed consent and safewords, but like most people, Dampier is reading a bit too much into “kink” and thus, in many ways, missing the significance.

Yes, kink is a place (the only place?) where it’s ok for a feminist or a leftist to act out traditional gender roles. At least among my set, BDSM was, essentially, a long running dirty joke. Take any sort of scenario, and turn it into some “scene.” BDSM was nothing but regular sexy times with the ladies wearing more fashionable clothes. There were a few people we knew that were into it a bit more “hardcore” than others but only the “community” feels as if it is some sort of “identity.”

De Sade’s Justine really has no connection to BDSM. It’s been a while since I’ve read it, but I seem to remember Justine was a philosophical piece about atheism with a torture-murder scene. The utterly awful 2003 film “Quills” was an attempt to turn De Sade into a Kinkster Philosopher Ahead of his Time but it was nothing but pure historical revisionism, as well as a total snoozefest.

No one has ever explained to me what is so terrible about bondage – have people really never tied up their ladyfriend or blindfolded her? They like the suspense. What do you think those fuzzy handcuffs at the novelty store are for? Spanking? Spanking is half sexy and half funny. Are we really going to suggest that is somehow “perverted?” Dominance and submission? Goodness, folks, that is in the Bible. It’s actually a commandment and the Christian ideal of marriage.

From what I can tell, the main hangups people have are pain and humiliation. All I can say is that people often have a complex relationship to pain. Pain is an inevitable part of life, applying pain in a controlled way can be comforting. Pain is sort of the opposite of pleasure, and each thing evokes its opposite. Have you ever had a really good deep tissue massage? You know how it hurts, yet feels really good at the same time?

Humiliation? OK, have you ever had a fight with your ladyfriend then had really great makeup sex afterward? You know, she pushes and pushes and you yell at her. It’s kind of humiliating to her when you put her in her place, but she kind of enjoys it when you take charge. The hilarious “Break Feminazis” scenarios on reddit are all the same basic gimmick, “uppity feminist Wonder Woman gets put in her place by a Real Man.” It’s like competitive comedy writing; it just so happens that many, many feminists actually get really aroused by it.

All the rest of BDSM is just costumes and role-play.

The other thing people don’t get is that, generally speaking, BDSM is a woman’s thing. BDSM scenarios are pretty much the number two fantasy of women, after the sort of standard “Prince Charming rips my bodice.” There are more women into it than men. In fact, it’s all rather understandable from a pop evolutionary pscyhology perspective as well.

I can assure you folks, 50 Shades of Grey is not a harbinger of the Decline and Fall of Western Civilization. It’s a throw away piece of girl porn with some spanking in it. Good grief.

The real issues that the West has is not that lots of girls think it’s sexy to be tied up and spanked, it is economic and social changes that have made marriage and family formation all but out of reach of the working class. Fix that problem and you’ll fix the fertility problem.

As for the divorce issues, it’s really simple and it is, in fact, kind of related to BDSM, at least, power in relationships. The court system gives wives a financial incentive to blow up their marriages. The court essentially hands a woman a grenade and says, “now don’t use this unless you really, really need to.” She now has the power in the relationship.

Imagine a hypothetical future in which wife-spanking was completely legal and accepted. I’m not kidding. A hypothetical future society where a husband was unequivocally in charge of his family, the Head of Household, and if he had to, he could take his wife over his knee and spank her as punishment.

If that scenario immediately makes you think, “that’s just awful. Husbands would just be abusing their wives for no good reason,” well, congrats, you are either a feminist or a conservative, as if all men, most men, or even a really significant minority of men actually like to abuse the women they love. These are the women they have pledged their entire lives to, the future mother of their children, and feminists – and conservatives – think men are just so evil and so awful that it is inevitable they would abuse their power, thus, men cannot be entrusted with any power at all. In fact, it would be better if the wife were in charge. (Hmm, perhaps traditional conservatism is actually full of submissive men. Apparently C. S. Lewis liked his wife to dominate him in bed.)

On the other hand, if that scenario makes you think, “goodness that’s hot, I would be so turned on if my man turned me over his knee when I was acting up,” email hipsterracist@yahoo.com for a good time.