Tag Archives: pro-white

The Mistake Of Identifying As “Right” Instead Of “Pro-White”

Whether “right wing” or “alt right” or “conservative” or even such right-associated terms as “libertarian,” all the label does is create a ready made excuse to:

a) Exclude Whites from the ingroup.

b) Include non-Whites in the ingroup.

c) Argue over whether an otherwise pro-White person or policy is truly “right wing” or “alt-right” or “conservative” or “libertarian.”

Fortunately, this dynamic helps to clarify things quickly. A Jew like Ben Shapiro can be “conservative” and “anti-left” and “anti-progressive” – he can even be a nationalist (which he is, he’s an Israeli nationalist, a Zionist.)

But Ben Shapiro will never be “White” and he’ll never be a “White Nationalist.” A figure like Ben Shapiro will always, 100% of the time, support Jewish nationalism while attacking White nationalism – any nationalism for Whites. Shapiro will attack immigration restriction in Ireland, Poland, Canada, Italy, and Hungary, but will always support immigration restriction in Israel.

This double standard makes it easy to see exactly what Ben Shapiro is. In theory, there could be an Ashkenazi White Nationalist, there could even be a Zionist Jew that supports White Nationalism, but what’s the point of chasing unicorns?

There are many Blacks and Asians and Arabs that are conservative, right wing, and even nationalist, but they will never be citizens – one of the in-group – in a White nation.

So all being a “conservative” or “right winger” does is to offer up ready made excuses for not being pro-White. To put “conservative principles” or “right wing ideology” above the survival of your race, your people, your family is autism in the extreme, an anti-adaptive trait.

You can’t hug a child with nuclear arms, and you can’t hug a White child with conservative ideology. Ideologies are merely words, a construct of language. People are living beings, flesh and blood. Why should words and ideals take precedence over your own flesh and blood, your own family, your own children?

Commenter Curmudgeon at TOO makes a related point:


On another note, I have long thought the term Alt-Right was a recipe for disaster. The old Left/Right paradigm is long dead, and the sooner nationalists own that label, the better. The majority of people know someone who has a family member or friend that is struggling with economic issues. It is much easier to answer the nonsensical globalist gibberish directly, by answering every statement in terms of ‘why do you care more about the well-being of someone living in a foreign country, whom you have never met, than the well-being of family, friends and neighbours’, and ‘How does immigration make your unemployed neighbour’s life better?’ The truth is, the globalists have no logical answers to these hard questions. Exposing them to folly of their own shallow answers will not turn all of them, I personally have made several unsure of the globalist rant, and turned a few.

“Alt Right” simply became a way to add “right wing” baggage into a promising pro-White movement and led to its destruction. “Neo-reaction” seems to have been created precisely to keep Whites arguing over an ideology and never make racial distinctions – especially, to prevent any mention of the anti-Whiteness of Ashkenazi Jews. In fact, NRx goes to hysterical extremes to include anti-White Ashkenazi Jews as “neo-reactionaries” while anathematizing pro-Whites who object to anti-White Jews or won’t subscribe to various hypothetical intellectual obsessions.

It’s putting the cart before the horse. Without Whites, there aren’t going to be any conservative Whites, nor libertarian Whites. So like a tree falling in the forest with no one around to hear it, no Whites are going to hear you signalling how principled you are about private property rights and the non-aggression principle.

Do you think any non-Whites will care what some conservative, “right wing” libertarian ideologue White thinks about anything?

I’m not White supremacist enough to think they would, or should.

Andrew Anglin is NOT “Alt Right” – He’s a Neo-Nazi Troll

At best, that is.

If Andrew Anglin was actually interested in promoting the interests of White people and was actually sympathetic to the Alt Right, he would:

1. Stop trying to co-opt the alt-right movement, which is not, and has never, been, or had anything to do with, neo-Nazis, trolls or otherwise.

2. Stop calling himself “Alt Right” – he’s not – and instead just be honest: he’s a neo-Nazi. He should change his blog header to say “Number One Neo-Nazi Site Online.” That’s true, and he can be proud of his accomplishment.

But Anglin won’t do that, because Anglin is not interested in helping the Alt Right – and probably doesn’t care about White people either. He’s quite clear about his goals:


1. Trolling.

2. Having fun.

3. Associating the Alt Right generally with Hitler, the Nazis, and Holocaust Shtick.

Not coincidentally, Andrew Anglin and the anti-Whites at the SPLC and the ADL share at least Goal #3.

Isn’t it interesting that Anglin & the Daily Stormer (along with certain other costume clowns) have spent untold digital ink on smearing the man who coined the “Alternative Right” name as a homosexual – along with that other group of people who share one of his main goals, the SPLC?

No, we’re not just talking about a joke – Anglin and his internet trolls have spent quite a bit of time libeling and slandering the person who invented the term “Alternative Right” with long homoerotic fictional tales and even accusations of felony rape. Sometimes this was meant as a joke – but sometimes clearly not a joke.

Anglin’s shtick may appeal to some teenage boys. Anglin’s shtick may, in fact, help to some degree in mocking Holocaust Hitler Hysteria that anti-Whites are always promoting (although more intelligent and funnier trolls like at TheRightStuff.biz are better at that.)

But Anglin’s pretense at being on the side of the Alt Right – just having different tactics – ua betrayed by his actions.

The fact that his site “just happened” to promote Joshua Goldberg, a Jewish terrorist posing as a “neo-Nazi” and an “ISIS sympathizer” – just makes his whole outfit even more suspicious.

But we know that Anglin isn’t going to go away. We know that Anglin will continue to try to associate the pro-White movement and the Alt Right with Hitler, the Holocaust, Hollywood Nazis and the rest of the SPLC/ADL agenda.

We know that Anglin will never just leave the Alt Right alone and do his own neo-Nazi thing.

So, the only thing that the Alt Right can do is to denounce him, forcefully, as the Jew shill he appears to be. Failing that, just distance themselves from him – whatever Anglin is, he is not us.

Ram Z Paul explained it. When he was asked to do an interview about the Alt Right, he immediately realized they were really doing a story about Anglin and the Daily Stormer, in order to smear the Alt Right by association with Anglin. Ram Z Paul did what he could – he said the Daily Stormer were neo-Nazi trolls and had nothing to do with the Alt Right.

As Anglin said, they are going to smear us as “neo-Nazis” anyway. But unlike Andrew Anglin, that does NOT mean we should side with Andrew Anglin, the Daily Stormer, the SPLC, and the ADL.

I’m not a Nazi, I’ve never been a Nazi. Neither are Kevin MacDonald, Richard Spencer, Jared Taylor, or Ram Z Paul. Neither are 90% of the people who identify with the Alt Right.

The Alternative Right is NOT led by Andrew Anglin and his neo-Nazi trolls. Nor is the Alt Right led by the homosexual Jew Milo and the neo-con pro-Israel site Breitbart.com.

Hillary Clinton, the SPLC, the ADL, the anti-Whites and Andrew Anglin all share the same goals – and those goals are not the same as ours.