Tag Archives: richard spencer

Anne Coulter Reads Hipster Racist: The Original Alt-Left

If you read Ann Coulter’s latest, Ann Coulter: Tips for Hate Crime Hoaxers you can’t help but see the influence of yours truly.

Liberal girls always seem to be imagining strong, rough, Heathcliff-type white men demanding that they disrobe or become “sex slaves.” (Oddly, Heathcliff keeps doing this in well-trafficked areas in the middle of the day with no witnesses.)

The hijab hoaxer at the University of Michigan described her imaginary Trump-supporting pursuer as white, in his 20s or 30s, with an athletic build, unkempt and intoxicated. He demanded that she remove her hijab. (After a police investigation, she admitted she made it up.)

The alleged hijab victim at University of New Mexico, Leena Aggad, said her hijab was ripped off by “a really buff guy wearing a Trump shirt.” (The attack was serious enough for her to tell the media about it, but not serious enough to report it to campus security, much less the police.)

A 28-year-old black woman, Kara Stevens, claimed three Trump-supporting white men in their 30s approached her in a Safeway parking lot in Hillsboro, Oregon, mentioned Donald Trump — then threatened to turn her into their “sex slave”! (Investigation suspended with no video, no witnesses and no evidence.)

With a little more imagination, these stories could become the new “Fifty Shades of Grey.”

I was, of course, writing “Liberal Girls Ravished By Right Wingers” Rape Porn before it was cool.

In fact, it seems that yours truly may in fact be the original “Alt-Left” – usually defined as the “left wing of the Alt-Right.” Not only does the Official Alt-Left site, AltLeft.com, link this blog, but anyone reading the description of what the “Alt Left” is can recognize this writer’s influence:

The AltLeft “Tea Party”

[The Alt Left] was always meant to augment the AltRight, not outright oppose it. It was a way to view and examine the affects of multiculturalism and political correctness from a cultural and economically left lens as well as from a secular and futurist perspective rather than the radical traditionalist, socially conservative one that dominates right wing circles. In other words, recognizing the implicit whiteness that underpins the identities of progressive cities like Seattle or Portland, and asserting that it must become explicit to some degree in order for those places to maintain their culture, aesthetic and quality of life. It was to put forth the idea that someone can be pro-white without the albatross of traditionally conservative culture, pre-modern aesthetics, capitalist economics, or widely accepted republican historical dogma.

Going back to nearly the beginning of the old MindWeaponsInRagnarok site, and the original post using the handle “Hipster Racist,” shows that this writer was doing it before anyone else was. We were celebrating the implicit racism of Portlandia since the beginning.

In fact, the entire concept of “hipster racist” was in fact an anti-white talking point gaining serious cultural currency until this writer co-opted it as pro-white, and few anti-white Social Justice Warriors have attempted to wield it seriously since.

Not only that, the original Alt Righter, Richard Spencer, has personally thanked Hipster Racist for inspiring his use of the term “hipster racism” nearly five years ago.

Like the Velvet Underground, I never sold a lot of records – but the people who did buy my records all went on to be rock stars themselves. I didn’t influence the masses, I influenced the elites who then went on to influence the masses.

I’m the Lou Reed of Racists.

You’re welcome.


(((Daily Stormer))) and the ADL/SPLC Attack NPI Again

Anglin is just the clown out in front – remember, just a few years ago Anglin was railing against “racists” and “anti-semites” and talking about how Jews are just so smart which is why Evil Whitey is so “Nazi.”

Then, Anglin turned on a dime, and started the well-funded (((Daily Stormer))) website, to co-opt the growing Alt Right movement and smear it by association with (((Hollywood Nazi.))) That’s their job, and there are obviously professionals behind the clowns like Anglin. The (((Daily Stormer))) used to publish (((Joshua Goldberg))) a Jewish propagandist working the (((Rita Katz))) of SITE, a well known Israeli Mossad front group in Washington DC.

So, a few Jews went to the NPI conference and “Sieg Heiled” for the camera along with the Asian porn star Tila Tequila, and now Andrew Anglin, the (((Daily Stormer))) the ADL and the SPLC – along with the Jewish media – is making up a completely fake story about Richard Spencer and NPI somehow being involved in … “naaaaaazis!” Of course, Anglin and the (((Daily Stormer))) are working hand in hand with Jews to associate the Alt Right in general, and Spencer/NPI in particular, with (((Hollywood Nazism.)))

Anyone who wasn’t born yesterday has seen this gimmick over and over again. If you bring it up, like the Alt Right’s Colin Lidell does, you’ll be trolled and spammed by Anglin’s little troll army of JDL operatives.

The were successful, now Trump and Brietbart have the excuse they needed to “denounce” the Alt Right, and anytime Spencer or NPI does anything, the ADL, the JDL, the $PLC – and Andrew Anglin and the (((Daily Stormer))) – will be there to draw a Hitler mustache on them.

That’s how the game is played, time for people to wise up.

A Bunch of Bowie Bullshit


He was a great musician and performer.

There is NOTHING more than that.

I consider myself a fan of David Bowie.

I love RadixJournal, NPI, and think Richard Spencer is the best spokesman we have.

But there is NOTHING anything more interesting or complex to David Bowie other than being an interesting artist/musician.

Let the dead RIP. For fuck’s sake.

TradYouthTrolls Excluded From NPI Conference

Some good news and good judgement out of the pro-White movement!


The costume clowns at Trad Youth Network are pretending that Matt Heimbach was uninvited to the NPI conference because he was “anti-gay.”

However, putting things in context, it wasn’t that at all. Let the organizer of the NPI conference, Richard Spencer, explain:

NPI will, however, exclude those who show reckless disregard with the media, or those who’ve made morally indefensible public statements. Such people make our movement look bad. We choose not to grant them a platform. It’s as simple as that.

I’ve written before about how Matt Heimbach is a “media clown” – he purposefully puts on a clown act for the media – in fact, that is the entire substance of what Heimbach and his associates do. They are “edgelords” – they try to be “radical.” Heimbach even changes his outfits depending on what character he is playing.

When he wants to be “tough” he puts on skinheads boots and leather jackets.

When he’s pretending to be an “orthodox Christian” he puts on Russian hats and carries around a big wooden cross as a prop to wave around at liberal women.

Heimbach and his associate, Robert Ransdell (who ran a fake political campiagn and distributed signs saying “With Jews You Lose”) stand around at rallies and scream and yell faux-“tough guy” slogans.

It’s all a completely phoney act, anyone with two brain cells to rub together can see that these people are not sincere, and they are not in substance different than the long line of fake “neo-Nazis” and actors that the $PLC has traditionally given publicity too. Matt Heimbach is just another in a long line of “radical neo-nazis” like the Jew Frances Cohen and his “Nazi” party, and also fake “jihadis” like Joseph Cohen of “Revolution Muslim.”

In fact, Heimbach is basically a creation of the $PLC. He was a nobody until the $PLC made him a star. Contrast that to Spencer, or someone like RamZPaul, who got an audience FIRST before the $PLC started smearing them.

I am sure – I have no doubt – that the fake group “TradYouth” – neither traditional, nor youth, let’s not forget – the group that waves around lynching signs and wears nazi-like armbands while Heimbach seig-heils for the cameras – I have no doubt that they are going to suggest they were excluded because of their strong stand against “sodomites.”

But don’t be fooled. Heimbach was excluded because he is a costume clown. He was excluded because he likes to get his ugly face on TV and give catch-phrases that can easily be used to slander the pro-White movement. That is all Heimbach does; that is his job.

It’s not that we can PROVE he is working for the $PLC in order to discredit anything pro-White.

It’s that it wouldn’t change anything if he was, so he may as well be.

Good on Richard Spencer and NPI. Just remember, “With Clowns We Go Down.”

TV Isn’t Real You Fucking Morons

Grow the hell up.

I’m reading the comments over at Radix Journal about the TV shooting. A poster, Ed Edgerton suggests maybe it’s a “false flag” and one commenter in particular, SL Cain, goes fucking nuts.


He starts name-calling, demanding that “conspiracy theorists” be banned, making up all sorts of bizarre strawmen and otherwise makes an ass of himself.

I do think he’s serious – he’s scared. Literally terrified – this man has almost certainly been watching TV for his entire life and even the thought that the TV might be “fake” not “real” would suggest he’s been nothing but an ignorant dupe for his entire life.

It’s terrifying for him – it’s scary.

Interestingly too is when he says that Edgerton should go to the purported victim’s father and tell him it was fake. I remember this tactic from the 9/11 days. Any time we suggested it was a “false flag” or that the government was lying, someone would say, “oh yeah go tell that to the victim’s families, they will kick you ass!”

I was like, hey buddy we ARE THE VICTIM’S FAMILIES. The 9/11 Truth movement was *started* by the survivors and the victim’s families. The only reason there was even an investigation is because the “Jersey Girls” – the four famous widows – spent two years campaigning for it. The Bush administration didn’t even want an investigation.

Now it’s funny, you have people on the comment thread calling for terrorism, murder and violence – posing as tough guys on the internet. But suggesting the TV isn’t real, that it’s fiction, that TV is full of actors – that’s when they start to lose their shit.

They have been sitting on their fat asses staring into a box with blinking lights and believing it’s “real” since they were CHILDREN – and any interruption from the brainwashing drives them into fits of rage.

Can these people even distinguish reality from Reality TV?


It doesn’t matter the event, it doesn’t matter the situation, it doesn’t matter the specifics, it doesn’t matter the evidence. If it’s on TV – IT MUST BE TRUE. They are living in a sort of virtual reality in which their actual cognition is mediated by technology.

Here’s the thing – it’s THEIR story. They don’t know any of the people involved. They didn’t witness the event. Even the video itself doesn’t actually show what people think it shows. We don’t have to prove anything – they have to prove that the TV show is real. Everyone is sitting in front of their computers and TV watching a fucking video with people they don’t know showing events they didn’t witness, yet they believe everything. It’s like a religion – they have “faith” that the TV news would never lie to them.

It’s frankly childish. People say “is everything a conspiracy?” My question is, “do you really believe everything on TV is real?”

This is the battle of the 21st Century, whether human beings will still be able to maintain a sense of reality in the face of the online world. When everyone is going around wearing Google Glass, having internet videos beamed into their retina, will they even be able to tell reality from virtual reality?

As you can see we’ve already lost a few generations to fucking TV shows. These are the idiots that complain because the TV shows aren’t wholesome Andy Griffith Leave it to Beaver shows. To them, the problem is they don’t like what’s on the TV anymore.

They can’t even begin to comprehend the problem is THEM staring at the electronic box all day long and thinking it’s real.

Now I wasn’t around or watching the news when the Sandy Hook thing happened, so I don’t know much about it either way. However, I do remember reading that the survivors of Sandy Hook formed a little children’s chorus and sang for the Superbowl.

Ok folks, please – think rationally. Your child has just survived a mass murder where they watched their classmates get gunned down by a psychopath. So you, as a parent, do what … tour with them around the country doing media stunts? Is that how a normal parent acts? Really?

It is legal for the government to stage events. They passed legislation a few years ago spelling this out explicitly. Why would they actually make legislation to allow the government to stage fake events if the government wasn’t going to do it?

The fact of the matter is people like SL Cain are idiots living in a fantasy world. People like that are so freaking gullible they would probably literally believe Little Green Men from Mars were invading earth if they saw it on the TV news. It’s been nearly a hundred years since the infamous War of the World radio show that had average White Americans driving to the hill to hide out from Martian invaders – and that was an admitted fictional broadcast. Imagine if they played it as if it was news?

Is there any doubt that SL Cain – and people like him – would be packing up the family and running for the hills before the Aliens got him?

I can tell you this, the media people in New York City I used to know – their contempt for the rubes in flyover country knew no bounds – and they were right to have such contempt.


The description from the CNN video above:

Just like the movie Wag the Dog, CNN is caught here faking news coverage of the Persian Gulf War during the early 1990’s. I’m sure they’ve gotten much better at it over the years. Charles Jaco was the CNN reporter in this video. The first part shows the stage set he was on, and he was clowning around with fellow CNN staff. The Saudi Arabian “hotel” in the background were fake palm trees and a blue wall in a studio. This clip was leaked by CNN staff. The second part of this video was a live CNN satellite feed recorded onto VHS showing the final cut. Charles Jaco was wearing a different jacket, but he had the same act. The acting was terrible as Charles Jaco wore a gas mask, and his fellow correspondent Carl Rochelle wore a helmet. The sirens and missile sound effects are part of the stage set. The camera never pans out or shows the sky. These clips are the highest quality of this newscast and behind the scenes.

Now here’s something else interesting. Reddit’s conspiracy forum is a very mixed bag, some very good information and some down right hokey nonsense. But the amount of trolls – angry, sputtering, cursing attacks on anyone questioning the latest TV news show – I mean, why would anyone bother?

There are two whole sections of reddit created specifically to attack the conspiracy section, both of them obviously from a pro-Israel position attacking the conspiracy denizens as “anti-semites.”

But aside from that obvious hasbara – why would anyone care? A few nut jobs posting crazy conspiracy theories on the internet – who cares? What in the world would possess someone to spend time and energy attacking them?

Some of it is what I suspect to be actual black ops, the exact kind detailed in the Snowden documents. But I’m guessing that is but a minority of it.

What is really happening is that people get ANGRY – downright HOSTILE – when anyone suggests that their TV News shows are fake and that they are being systematically deceived.

This triggers something psychological in people.

Clerics Are Cheaper Than Call Girls

Former Air Force Gets Leaked FBI Docs Showing CIA Complicity in 2002 Anthrax Attacks. He’s Arrested, Tortured, Drugged, Accused Of Spying For Russia And Child Porn


Nothing to see here, folks!

Forced injection of drugs – just like they tried to do to Susan Lindauer. Even if he is a homosexual pedophile, the child porn charges are obviously not the main point here

According to the FBI’s own report, Matt was detained because he was “wanted for questioning in an espionage matter.”

But 9/11 was 14 years ago! It clearly has no more relevance – until you have copies of classified documents that were part of the cover-up.

We’ve known for years – it is acknowledged by everyone now, that the Anthrax Attacks – right after the 9/11 attacks, were an “inside job” and came from a strain of anthrax from a US military lab in Ft. Meade, Maryland. An “insider” was arrested – and later committed suicide – for doing this acknowledged “inside job.”

It was not particularly subtle either – “DEATH TO AMERICA DEATH TO ISRAEL PRAISE ALLAH!” – and the letters were sent to the opposition party politicians that were blocking the PATRIOT Act.

Think back, Dear Reader. Did you actually think that it came from some dusky A-Rabs in Al Qaeda?

The FBI has acknowledged that there was further questioning of Matt during his time in jail, but it will not reveal specifics, saying the reports are “classified.” On one occasion, Matt says, he was restrained naked, with a black pillowcase over his head, and tased. He says that agents interrogated him over and over about WikiLeaks, Anonymous, the Shell, and the Air National Guard. According to Matt, one agent said that he knew the charges of child pornography were bogus, and that he could help get them dropped if Matt chose to cooperate.

Matt also claims that the FBI tried to use his allegiance to his father against him. He says agents produced surveillance photos that showed him sitting in the car with his father outside the Russian Embassy. The agents somehow even had audio recordings of their conversation and knew what he and his father had been discussing.

Leann was another story: She wanted to hear whatever Matt wanted to tell her. If Paul didn’t want to know, so be it — she’d assume the risk. “If anything ever happens to me,” she recalls Matt telling her, “I want you to know what I know.”

But she believes that what she saw was true: the agrochemical company’s culpability in 13,000 deaths, the CIA’s role in the anthrax attacks. She tells more than Matt had recalled, stories that sound too incredible to be true: a report that says the CIA explored plans to put anthrax in a New Jersey bay in order to drum up support for the war. “That’s what they were going to do,” she recalls, “And I remember reading that and saying [to Matt], ‘OK, all right, I know you’re not crazy.’”

But, invariably, many hearing this story now will not be so understanding. “This is real,” she tells me one afternoon as we talk in a Chinese restaurant near her and Paul’s apartment in Ontario. “I saw it,” she goes on, as her voice falters and eyes redden, “and that’s when the lights start going on, and I’m thinking to myself, Now that’s something you’d torture somebody for.”

Now what I’d like to know is what exactly makes a “conspiracy theory.” Thanks to a new clickbait “conspiracy theory” website, http://www.conspiracyclub.co/2015/01/30/cia-admitted-staging-fake-isisbeheading-video/ – one very interesting article was saved from the memory hole.

Washington Post – 2010

(As far as I know, the Washington Post is not considered to be a “conspiracy theory website.”)


Notice how the CIA is desribed as “wacky” – like “wacky” spy Maxwell Smart! These guys are just bumbling fools, comedians – and hilarious!

The agency actually did make a video purporting to show Osama bin Laden and his cronies sitting around a campfire swigging bottles of liquor and savoring their conquests with boys, one of the former CIA officers recalled, chuckling at the memory. The actors were drawn from “some of us darker-skinned employees,” he said.

Now – nobody tell Greg Johnson of Counter Currents or Gregory Hood and Richard Spencer of National Policy Institute, but the Washington Post just reported that all the way back in 2003 the CIA was making fake videos of Osama Bin Laden and Saddam Hussein.

When we said “the videos are fake” – back in 2003, as well as currently with all the ISIS atrocity videos – we got labeled as “conspiracy theorists” and the serious, responsible dissidents – like Greg Johnson and Richard Spencer and Gregory Hood – along with other “alternative dissident” writers like Noam Chomsky and Amy Goodman – all distanced themselves.

In fact, many on the “alt right” denounced the “conspiracy theorists” and instead said, “hey, it’s just Muslims being Muslim!”

I guess they didn’t read the Washington Post.

You know, back in the 50s and 60s – when the current “liberal” regime came into power – the conservatives, the right-wing, the reactionaries….

They were obsessed with foreign Communists. These Communists were “Russians” not the original Bolsheviks of the early days of the USSR. To the conservatives, the right-wingers, the reactionaries – these Russian “Communists” – “Ruskies” – were engaged in a massive world wide conspiracy and responsible for floridation in drinking water. (Hilariously, no one pretends that floride in drinking water has a noticeable impact on dental health these days.)

These conservatives, right-wingers, and reactionaries never seemed to notice that the actual “Communist Conspiracy” attacking their culture and even biological integrity was headquartered in New York, not Moscow.

These days, we have “right wingers,” “conservatives” “alt-righters” and “White Nationalists” thinking that the Muslim Conspiracy – “DEATH TO AMERICA! DEATH TO ISRAEL! PRAISE ALLAH!” – is headquartered in Basra as opposed to at the office of Rita Katz’ SITE Intelligence Group in Chevy Chase, Maryland.

The thing is, White people that have actually heard of SITE Intelligence Group are probably “conspiracy theorists” and are almost certainly critical of Zionism and certain aspects of globalism – whether they are “right wing Whites” or “left wing Whites.”

Yet the “White Nationalist” movement – the most professional blogs, the most educated and best-written of them – want to write off this actual, grassroots “conspiracy theorist,” implicitly – sometimes explicitly – white group.

Because the National Policy Institute and Counter Currents don’t want to “get involved in any conspiracy theories.”

Oh, but that doesn’t mean they actually get to be “respectable” though – Counter Currents was just relieved of their clickbait money at Amazon.com.

So pretending to believe in ISIS … “DEATH TO AMERICA! DEATH TO ISRAEL! PRAISE ALLAH!” …

it’s not buying them anything – is it?

Let’s say one day the Empire decided to invade the rural South. Then, all of a sudden, some Westboro Baptist Church-cum-Kevin Smith’s Red State “Christian” group shows up. Now, it does a perfect job “interpreting the Bible” just like a true Primitive Baptist Church does. Think that Florida church that used to burn the Koran every once in a while. They get massive media exposure, and they are “terrorists” – they even make “terrorist” videos of their crimes.

It all happens far away from your Madison, Wisconsin townhouse, mind you. But you can certainly believe those Crazy Right Wing Religious Racist Nutjob Christians in Dixie would totally be Lynching Negroes and holding secret, Satanic, KKK rallies. Plus, they are probably gay and fuck boys.

Come on, admit it. You’d totally believe it. And there would be plenty of Nice White Liberal bloggers who would get click-bait from these stories.

It’s like outrage porn, right? Arrogant political speeches from Radical Anti-Choice Clinic Bombers.

Now, how easy would it be to find some “real” Christian-Zionist from Texas and have him deliver youtube sermons about nuking Iran for Israel. Or, how about some “real” Muslim from Iran talking about nuking Israel for Islam?

Here’s a handy Hipster Racist fact:

Clerics are cheaper than call girls.

(P.S. – just in case I’m not clear, “Clerics Are Cheaper Than Call Girls” is not some profound statement on religion or sex. It’s more like a statement of basic economic fact. Call girls are like hundreds of dollars an hour. Clerics – rabbis, imams, priests, preachers, and the like – can often be had for something close to minimum wage.)

NPI Gets A Clue

The National Policy Institute is “real” – it has a budget. Richard Spencer is a professional. In theory, it’s a pro-White think tank. It could be lobbying officials to restrict immigration or just put out policy papers in the interests of White people.

RadixJournal.com usually has some interesting articles. Gregory Hood, who I’ve been reading for years since he used to post on OccidentalDissent, blogs there.

But I was shocked when I read Louis Jahn’s Major National Security Threats article. In it, he:

1. Refers to Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 as a “false flag.”

2. Acknowledges that NATO has been arming our “enemy” ISIS/ISIL.

For a White Nationalist blog, this shows a huge amount of courage. Gregory Johnson of Counter Currents, for example, attacks “conspiracy theorists.” But of course, if you read the comments on the Radix thread, the usual suspects are trying to shove everything back into the militia/counter-jihad box.

But it is like watching a light bulb go off over someone’s head. For once. Maybe there is some hope for this “White Nationalist” movement after all.


The story of Dr. Steven Jones of Brigham Young University is quite telling. He’s just some work-a-day chemist and studies the dust from the World Trade Center demolition on 9/11.

Immediately, someone in the “nuclear industry” contacts him, demanding his retract his paper. Jones is offered money for co-operation, or losing his job if he does not.

Why would anyone bother to attack some work-a-day chemist for publishing a “conspiracy theory?”

In Hypothesis, they interview the guy that threatened and attempted to bribe Dr. Jones (he lost his job anyway. 9/11 Truth is not quite illegal, but it’s pretty close. You can be fired. It’s just like “racism” or “anti-semitism” in that way.)

Anyway, watch the shill as he explains why he threatened/bribed Dr. Jones. Listen to him explain that Dr. Jones might be “helping terrorists” if he publishes about the thermetic material found in the dust.

He obviously doesn’t do a convincing job, but it doesn’t matter.

This is how the system works. Dissident are threatened or bought off.

The Penis Police

Over at radixjournal, the poster named “wattylersrevolt” derailed the conversation to talk about his favorite subject: homos. He spent a lot of time in the comment box telling us how he was totally against homos, how he thought they were “filthy” and went into lurid details about buttsex and the like.

TMI, dude.

Of all the legitimate problems whites have with our sexual culture, how crass things have become, our declining fertility rate, hostility between men and women, divorce, etc. All that being true – how do rants about “sluts” help anything? Probably a quarter of my subscribers are “manosphere” types and (for whatever reason) I’m listed on people’s blogs as being part of the “manosphere” – but at the end of the day, I’m sure as hell not in the category of “betas” bitching that I can’t get laid. Quite the opposite, frankly.

Women – hell, even actual feminists – have some legitimate concerns with things like the pornography culture. Men – even the obnoxious “men’s rights advocates” – have some legitimate issues with things like family court and divorce.

But the proof is in the pudding, folks. Which women out there have blogs helping young women to find husbands? Which women out there are encouraging white women to have children? Which women out there are encouraging women to not divorce their husbands at the drop of the hat? Basically, none. Instead, it’s constant whining and bitching about men, porn, etc.

Where are the manosphere types helping men not just learn “game” to get laid, but actually helping young men gain the necessary talents, money, education, and the like to marry and raise a family? Where are the manosphere types mentoring young men on what it takes to keep a family together? Mostly, none. Lots of whining and bitching about “sluts” that would rather fuck sleazy hipsters – like me – rather than pathetic whining “beta” “m’ladies” – like you.

Then – really – what kind of man is obsessed with homosexuals? What kind of man seeks out pictures of gay pride parades and queers parading around in their underwear? What kind of man thinks that homos are even an issue that rates somewhere above, say, 89th of the 100 things wrong with the way things are today?

Richard Spencer’s recent interview where he was asked about this, he said essentially, “let’s stop pretending that homosexuality was invented in the 1960s.” Go throughout history, there have always been homos. These things go in cycles, you’ll have gays being open, then they will be suppressed, then they “come out” again. This particular cycle is just another in this long line of things.

I admit, I read the Daily Stormer every once in a while because it can be funny. But – the Daily Stormer is pretty much everything we don’t need. The Daily Stormer – because it’s a troll site related to the old 4chan forum /pol/ – appeals to a particular group of people – namely, young white nerdy boys that like to use the internet a lot. It can be funny, maybe even cathartic, but it’s just trolling – it’s just humor. If you were to take it too seriously, I would question your judgement.

So what does the Daily Stormer do on a regular basis? “Hey, look at this fag! Look at this slut! Perverted sex! Porno! Jews!”

What kind of people would be attracted to that sort of thing? It doesn’t take much to guess, now does it?

So their latest is – of course, you knew it would come to this eventually – something about pedophilia. There is, of course, some Grand Jew Conspiracy to legalize pedophilia. Again, it’s as if these people think that pedophilia was invented in the 1960s. Don’t people remember that Mohammad married a 9 year old? Pedophilia has always existed. It’s not new. It goes in cycles – at some point angry women get together and suppress the worst kind of men, then they go too far and things get relaxed, and the cycle repeats itself.

If people were actually interested in stopping child molestation, they would promote an open sexual culture for children, so they understand “stranger danger” and they understand that no adults should touch them “in the bathing suit area.” Frank sex education should be taught to children from day one. That, more than anything, would keep children from being victims.

But, of course, these people don’t actually give two shits about children – that’s an excuse. The reality is, they LOVE to think about pedophiles and child molestation. They *love* to look at advertisements with children in them and say, “look pedophile! They are making that child look sexy! Pervert! Jews!”

They get off on it. They love it. They love to look for aberrant sexuality and point to it, because they get off on it. They love to find perverts, homos, and other sexual aberrations and spend a lot of time thinking about them.

They don’t actually care about a healthy sexual culture – they care about projecting how totally “not gay” they are, or “not perverted” they are.

It’s idiotic, is what it is. It’s Penis Policing. I wrote a handful of spanking stories, and some people were like “it’s the Jews! You must be a Jew because you got a blowjob and wrote about it! You must be a Jew because you write sexy stories!”

Come on, you know what this is – this is church ladies getting all hot and bothered. I’ll be honest – I love love love trolling feminists on reddit. I write “rapey” stories and they buzz around like flies on shit. I hope you people realize that feminists are always talking about “rape culture” and “domestic abuse” because they *are really really turned on by rape fantasies and violent men.* Just look at some “anti-domestic violence” media sometime. It looks like 50 Shades of Grey style porn doesn’t it? Remember the recent UVA “rape story?” It was nothing but an elaborate gang-bang fantasy some young lady made up to get the attention of some boy she liked.

I think dalrock is one of the best Christian manosphere sites. From a Christian perspective, he shows how utterly hypocritical feminists are, how utterly against traditional Christian morality “modern women” have become. The sexual revolution was a women’s movement – women didn’t like the fact they were only allowed to have sex with their husbands. They wanted to take a turn gang banging the Hot But Sleazy Hipsters before they had to settle down with their boring but nice husbands. That’s why women freak the hell out about virginity – they don’t want to settle down before they get to “ride the carousel” and they will come up with all sorts of reasons why any man would avoid marrying a promiscuous women is really bad, in some way.

The difference is, no one has any problem pointing to bad behavior in men. A man cheats on his wife? We call him a cheating bastard. A woman cheats on her husband? Well, her husband must have done something bad. She wasn’t happy. He probably abused her.

White Knights are afraid to call out women on their bad behavior because they think if they never say anything bad to a woman it will get them laid. The big secret of “game” is that women actually love it when they are dragged off that pedestal and treated like the horny little things they are. The man that sees through a woman’s “shit tests” – that’s the kind of guy who gets laid like tile.

People who are obsessed with sluts, homos, and pedophiles are just that – people who are obsessed with aberrant sexuality. They are not more moral than others – quite the opposite. Remember when Pete Townshend was busted for child porn? What did he say? He was just doing it “for research.” You know, like guys read Playboy “for the articles.” Just like Ted Haggard was hanging around gay meth dealers to “tell them about Jesus.” Uh-huh. Sure thing.

Here’s my new rule. I read the Daily Stormer – if anything I write sounds anything like the Daily Stormer – I know I’m doing it wrong.