Tag Archives: sluts

Why Women Love Me But Hate You

So Little Miss Fuck and Run – 24 years old, by the way – well she tells me she’s reading 50 Shades of Grey. So, of course, she wants to try it. Ten minutes later, I had her hands tied to her bedposts, she’s blindfolded and I’m smacking her ass really, really hard.

Good lord is was *so fucking hot* for both of us.

A year later, rinse and repeat with a new one – Yoga Ass. She liked me so much she had my baby.

See, you beta boys don’t get it. You think it’s weird and kinky – you think it’s some porn thing, that if you watch a bunch of porn, you’ll start to like flogging women.

But don’t worry, that will never happen. You are either born with it, or you are not. The fact you are “betas” and women despise you – it is precisely because you don’t have a taste for controlling women and being rough with them. Women *love it* – most of them. All of them, I’m convinced. Blindfolds, restraints, spanking, hair pulling – they love it. To them, it’s just a good night. But you betas – you boys that are shy around women or whatever – eh, well, somebody has to do all the work while us “alphas” fuck your women.

Now, I’m older, I’m not the young slutty stud I used to be, but the story of one year of my life is far more interesting than the story of your entire life.

They call it “power exchange” and it is when you have all the power, and the woman has no power. She’s literally hog tied, unable to move. You can do anything you want to her. Women, see, they love the suspense, they tie themselves in knots (!) thinking, anticipating what awful, horrible things her Alpha Sadist is going to do to her. Will it hurt? Probably. Will it be humiliating? Certainly. And it will make her come harder than she ever has, and when she is in bed with her Beta, it will give her something to fantasize about.

So their little yelps of pain, the involuntary jerks, the way their little butt muscles tense up, the way they twist around on their toes – fuck fuck fuck it makes me fucking hard. Can’t help it. I don’t know why, it just is.

See, guys like us, we’re really just doing a public service. You should like, pay us.

See, it used to be a secret. “Our little secret” we called it. You could tell the gals that were into it, because they would usually signal it someway. Those were the ones that knew what they were. Many gals need to be introduced to it, and sure they are scared at first, but that just adds to the hotness.

Now, the dim-witted Church Ladies will scream about “jew porn” but the reality is, they like it too, they just like to keep up appearances.

So 50 Shades brought it all out of the closet. You’ll notice that virtually every woman read it. Even though it is supposedly terribly written, they still bought it. It’s a massive bestseller.

I have to laugh at the Nazitards at places like Daily Stormer, full of betas whining about how women are sluts – that’s just jealousy. Women are sluts – for guys like me – and they are chaste virgins for guys like you. See how that works? The Nazitards actually wrote an anti-50 Shades article, a bunch of betas posing as “family values” types wanking it to stories of white sluts they wish they could have. Lulz.

I’ve never even had a “third date” – in fact, I’ve barely had a second date. Because I’m the “bad boy.” Frankly, it’s s burden, but someone has to do it. You certainly aren’t giving your woman what she wants.

So, I will.

You’re welcome.

Feminism – Not Porn – Ruined Marriage

The most dangerous people to any sort of renaissance of Western culture and the European peoples are White feminist women, especially those middle age or older.

Full stop.

I realize I’m already treading on thin ice, because these old biddies remind too many people of their mothers. But not me; my mother was not a feminist in the slightest. That’s probably why she is still happily married – to my father – had more that double replacement level children, and is now a beloved grandmother – *and* great-grandmother. She had both boys and girls and has both male and female grandchildren and great-grandchildren.

So none of these aging second wave feminist women remind me of my mother, at all. I feel perfectly ok criticising them.

So one of the most common feminist complaints is the “double standard.” Women who are promiscuous as sluts, while men who are promiscuous as studs. Leaving aside this really isn’t the case, no one seems to ask – why should there be a “single standard” for both men and women? Considering that men and women are different – not just their reproductive systems, but even their cognition – why would anyone expect there to be one single rule for both?

It’s actually a really simple thing to figure out. Ask one of these aging second wave feminists how they want to “fix” this problem of double standards. Should we start “stud shaming” promiscuous men? Christian and many traditional men seem to think so, which you see in the backlash against “game” and “PUA.” This is why Christians and traditionalist men like to assert there is some “gay” or homosexual about promiscuous men. (The more women you have sex with, the gayer you are, apparently. That’s the sort of logic conservatives are famous for.) The problem is, of course, women *love* promiscuous men. How do you think they had the opportunity to be so promiscuous?

So the aging second wave feminists will tell us the solution to the “double standard” is to stop “slut shaming.” Since men are praised (by women) for being promiscuous, women should be praised by men for being promiscuous.

Really, they give themselves away. For all the bra-burning and blabber about “equal rights” and the like, what they really want is to have their sluttery praised. Notice that they do *not* want men to stop being promiscuous, they want it to be ok for women to be promiscuous. In other words, these aging second wave feminists are not very different than their Third Wave Sex-Positive Feminist counterparts – the only difference is, the Third Wavers had the ovaries to admit they were Empowered Sluts. The aging second wavers don’t have the courage their younger counterparts do.

Now even the pseudo-traditionalist types who say they are against men being promiscuous too make it awfully convenient for themselves. They will say that men and women should avoid promiscuity, but it can be overlooked in either sex. It’s just that, at some point, the promiscuous men are supposed to “man up,” stop being so promiscuous and marry the women – *when the women decide they are good and ready for marriage, and not a moment before.*

I mean, they spent their teens and 20s fucking these promiscuous men, and now the men won’t “man up” and marry them. Instead – horror of horrors – these promiscuous men just started screwing around with younger women! That’s basically rape, child molestation, and certainly exploitation in some way, right?

The pussy should have been enough. I mean, these Feminist Princesses were so gracious to “allow” you to have sex with them, so now you owe them a ring, a house, and alimony and child support when she decides to replace you. Otherwise, misogyny. You hate women.

So one of these things these aging second wave bra-burners will tell us is that it was Playboy – porn – that ruined marriage. Or the media – anything, anything, except any hint that it might be women – particularly, women under the sway of that left wing crank ideology of feminism – that actually caused the massive shift in public morals that led to the sky high divorce rates, fatherless children, the massive decline in white fertility and all of the associated dysfunctions caused by these things.

Many feminists openly stated they wanted to destroy marriage, and they did it in two simple steps. First, they encouraged women to give away the milk for free, thus removing one of the major incentives for buying the cow. The fact that this little saying is conventional folk wisdom – something your married, non-feminist grandmother might have said – shows you there is some wisdom behind the notion.

The second thing they did was even worse. Plenty, perhaps most, men will overlook a woman’s past – *if he got the other benefits of marriage.* After all, marriage is not just about sex. But feminists took away all those benefits as well. Let’s see – presumptive maternal custody. If wifey decides she is unhaaaaaapy and wants a divorce, she gets the kids. The courts favor this and the culture favors this, only the most highly motivated fathers will fight the culture and the courts to get custody.

A man used to get married because it came with certain benefits – regular sex, children that were his, the leadership of his family, and the social prestige that came with being a married family man.

Well now, thanks to feminism *and nothing else* a husband can have no expectation of regular sex. That is “entitlement to a woman’s body” – which makes you just like that half Asian pretty boy killer – not to mention it’s marital RAPE!!!

Second, “leadership of your family” – what is that, some sort of misogynist throwback to the 1950s? Why should the man be in charge? It has to be “equal” – or better, the woman should have the final say, because women are just so much more mature and sensitive than men, they are just morally superior of course.

Is there any social prestige left in marriage? I don’t see any. The culture assumes that married men are morons who are lucky to have his sweet precious long suffering wife, a dopey moron always being corrected in the TV commercials by his wife and an ever present African American gentlemen.

You see, chivalry works when a man who has *more power than a woman* uses that power in a gentle, respectful way. If the men don’t have power, then they are just “beta orbiters,” supplicators and pedestalizers. Chivalry from a beta schlub is creepy or pathetic – at best – and sexual harassment at worst.

The manosphere classic, Sexual Utopia in Power by F. Roger Devlin catalogs all this brilliantly. This is the new arrangement that men are supposed to accept:

A white woman is expect to “find herself” by having lots of sex with many numerous sexy bad boys from her 16th birthday until her 29th birthday. Then, one of these studs she has been regularly servicing for 13 years is supposed to “man up” and make an honest woman of her. They will have 1.5 kids, then divorce (his fault, he probably watched internet porn or something) and he’s stuck paying for her, the kids, and her new boyfriend who is quite possibly living at the house he paid for.

Failing that, she might panic and find some “beta” schlub she isn’t particularly attracted to, but since he’s never had sexual attention from a woman before, he gets all pussy crazed and actually wifes up one of these amateur prostitutes. This, of course, will inspire nothing but *contempt* in the woman, because this beta schlub actually found her to be marriage material – when she knows damn well that she is not.

Is anyone really shocked that men are no longer signing up for this “privilege?”

To fix the problem is actually pretty simple – STOP EXPLOITING YOUNG WOMEN. Teach young women the differences between men and women. Teach them that their duty is to compliment – not compete with – her husband and bear children. I urge all the young virgin women who are interested in marriage – say so. Say you’re saving yourself for marriage. Say you are going to be the kind of wife a man wants. And start it young. 16 years old? You’re old enough to be considering marriage. If you are old enough to “find yourself” by having sex with boys and men – you’re old enough to consider marrying one of those boys/men.

Feminist don’t want this. Feminists believe they should be able to have two children by two different “alpha studs” and have the welfare state pay to support them should Alpha Badboy not come through with the ring and the mortgage. Feminists believe that women will invent as much as men, will build the large corporations that dominate the economy just like men do, and that given the right education, women will become construction engineers, just like men.

The only thing holding them back is The Patriarchy – that social construct where by men know they are the father of their own children. To a feminist, that *is* oppression. Not just a double standard, it’s actually “misogyny” – hatred of women!

There has always been a class of prostitutes in every society. It’s just that in the modern West, our prostitutes are usually amateurs. Which means it’s great for whoremongers – sleazy hipsters who just happen to be relatively good looking and not shy around women – and it’s terrible for those good, responsible family men that women want to marry them on their 29th birthday after the whoremongers have moved onto younger flesh.

Bed, made, lie in it, feminists.

No rings for sluts.

P.S. – feminists go out of their way to suppress how much feminism itself was sold to them by big business, most notoriously, Big Tobacco. From the “Torches of Liberty” march to the Virginia Slims commercials of the 60s and 70s, women were told it was a “double standard” that men could smoke and not be socially shamed while women were looked down upon for smoking cigarettes.

Was the feminists response to fight against men smoking? Of course not. It was to fight for the right for women to smoke as well. Good job, wimminz, you totally weren’t suckered by men far smarter than you that did not have your best interests at heart.

You’ve come a long way, baby!

Are Christians Fucking Stupid?

I just discovered this. A big argument against early marriage is “well you want your daughter to go to college, right? How can she go to college if she’s married with children?”

Are Christians so literally – measurably – dim that they bought this “argument?”

I’m sorry, please point out the statute forbidding married women from attending college? Please point out the statute forbidding mothers from attending college?

What – there is no such law?

Then why are Christians and other supposed “traditionalists” wetting their pants anytime a leftist whines about early marriage preventing women from going to college?

What you will find, quick like, is that your own women – the so-called “traditional” women – are against early marriage too. They want girls to be able to postpone marriage and child bearing as long as possible. Also, no hang ups about girls losing their virginity to their husbands – that’s so 1950s – even for conservatives.

The a) age that women lose their virginity b) to whom, and c) whether they have children or use birth control – is the main issue in the so called “manosphere” – and “feminism” – and all the handwaving over “PUA” and “game” and “men’s right” and all that rot just prove it.

But everyone is afraid of discussing the obvious issue.

I blame the fathers, personally. They married sluts and are afraid to “man up” in front of their slut wives and reign in their daughters. All it would take is telling little Johnny he can only get the pussy if he “mans up” and marries her first.

But wives will NOT allow their fathers to do that – and the fathers, evidently either too cowed by Divorce Inc., or otherwise just beta schlubs, are too chicken to stand up to their wives.

So, their daughters slut it up with sleazy hipsters then expect to marry a “nice guy” someday.

Give them two options – a) kill all the sleazy hipsters and “PUAs” that “seduced” your innocent daughters who were raped, they totally didn’t want it …

or b) marry your daughter off before she starts spreading her legs for whichever mildly handsome guy happens to flirt with her that day…

and Christians and conservatives clearly prefer option a).

And they will whine all day long about boys who “ruined” their daughters and who should have just kept it in their pants – and out of their daughter’s mouth – then complain when Nice Guy won’t marry her at 30/99 dicks later?

Good job, guys. No, don’t shake my hand – you don’t want to know where it’s been.

Cue the wailing from the Elder Sluts – especially the Racist Feminists – who would rather Western society die a slow death than ever restrict a young woman’s sluttiness. That might imply they weren’t perfect and it was all the men’s fault.

Yes, I’m looking at you, aging Second Wavers … what about Playboy now?

New Year’s Resolution

Ah, Chrissy, the school slut. Thanks for the blow jobs in the band room. You walking around with your mouth full of my spunk looking for a place to spit it out was hilarious, and I still feel bad for whichever music teacher found the cup.

Dottie, you date rapist, taking a drunk boy’s innocence like that. Years later, when Fred told me what a lousy lay you were, I was surprised, because you rode me like a champ that first night.

Bree – sigh. My first love. The fact you gave me your virginity made the whole thing special in a way you never really understood. I would have forgiven you fucking Paul – since we were “on a break” – but the lying was unforgivable. It would have never lasted anyway.

Steph – um, sorry about that. I didn’t realize you were really into me. I was blitzed out on acid!

Amy – good lord almighty. The statute of limitations has passed right? When I bent your little 15 year old ass over the desk and fucked you doggy style, that was the first time I felt like a man. Good lord you were such a slut though, I always wondered if you and Mandy ever did make it down to New Orleans and become strippers or not.

What’s her name, Jon’s friend? Christina? Yeah, I guess that was a pump and dump. Didn’t I fuck you in the laundry room? LOL. Jon’s dad was pissed when he found us all sleeping in the same room, horrifying visions of orgies and the like going through his head. We were good church kids, remember?

Rena – the bitch. A lifeguard, no less. You had an amazing body. I still laugh thinking about how you literally had to pull my cock out of your mouth to go answer the door when the Air Force Lt. showed up to take you out. When he kissed you after your date, I wonder if he could taste me? LOL.

There’s a few between high school and college that I’m forgetting.

OK, first girl in the dorms, can’t remember your name. Nice tits. Second girl in the dorms, not even sure I remember much of that night. The rest of the semester in the dorms I’m forgetting too.

The chicks we picked up in DC that night, whatever your names were. Thanks, I guess.

Margie. The best fuck of my life. I was 19, I couldn’t keep up with you. My favorite time – it was 2am, I had to be at work the next morning and wouldn’t fuck you. So, you just did the tiniest little shake of your ass against me, barely perceptible, and within 10 seconds I was so hard I just grabbed you and took you to town. You were a thoroughbred. You taught me how to fuck. Your fault you started being a bitch and hanging around with that dyke next door. The belly button piercing was sexy, but the haircut? Gross. Ah well, you can’t turn a whore into a house wife.

Shannon. Sigh. My mom said, “that little black haired girl, she really like you.” If I hadn’t have been coming off of that nasty break up with Margie, it could have worked between us. Of the trio, you had the best body, I’ll always remember seeing you all naked for the first time in the hot tub.

California next. That’s where I start losing count.

Then, NYC, sluttiest girls on the planet. I don’t remember most of your names. NYC girls are the ones that got me into all the kinky stuff. I guess it got to full blown sex addiction at that point. Hey crazy bitch, remember when we fucked at the bar, everyone watching while you just sort of bounced on my lap? The playground? The girl’s room at the club? Good times.

Then, Dixie. I keep getting older, they keep staying the same age. LOL, I always wanted to use that line.

New Year’s Resolution: Stop being such a slut and settle down with a nice Christian girl. I’ll be like a reborn virgin.

Why We Hate Feminism

Women: when you read this, try to reign in your own solipsism and realize it’s not about you personally. Try – really try – to empathize with those invisible “beta” men that you don’t even see as individual human beings. Realize that it’s you that project your own thoughts and feelings on to men, and it’s women that objectify men, sexually and otherwise. Try to stop yourself when you immediately want to scream “but I’m not like that! But you’re a slut too! Rape!!!” Also, it’s not about Hipster Racist, personally, either. I want you to really be able to understand feminism from the perspective of an average man, those “beta males.”

Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee. -- Genesis 3:16
Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee. — Genesis 3:16

First wave feminism was all about women getting the vote – and it was men, not women, that did the deed. First wave feminist pioneers like Lucy Stone hated their fathers and wanted to be men. So they struck the first blow at patriarchy: she wouldn’t take her husband’s last name. While mostly symbolic, the symbolism is important. There’s an old saying, “mother’s baby, father’s maybe.” Ensuring paternity of children is extremely important to a man, the only way it could really be done pre-genetic testing was guaranteeing that your wife was a virgin. Raising another man’s children is genetic death; it’s anti-self, it’s cuckolding. This is likely why men tend to have a preference for virgins.

Of course women did get the privilege of voting, but shirked on the responsibility that came with it – taking up arms against rival states. The whole purpose of voting was to control the state, and as Mao said, political power grows out of the barrel of a gun. It’s the military that makes the state, therefore democracy was all about the men governed by the state having a say in the affairs of the state. Women weren’t expected to join the military, therefore there was no reason for them to vote. A man’s vote was essentially for his whole family; his wife and children, it was expected that he would vote in the interests of his family, and did. Women were not part of the state, thus wouldn’t participate in either fighting or voting.

Second wave feminism was even worse, this was upper class educated housewives with two (at best) grown children who sat around their very nice suburban houses bored out of their minds. Instead of coming up with something creative and useful to do, they bitched about housework. To this day, you have the aging second wave feminists with so little imagination that anything to do with housewifery is automatically associated with vacuuming or doing the dishes. This, more than anything, illustrates how moronic second wave feminists really were and are. That’s the best you can come up with, housework? Compare to the Biblical description of an ideal wife; the Proverbs 31 wife. She didn’t just sit around vacuuming, she ran the home, as a business. The idea is that the man works outside of the home, with a group of other men, while women ran the home business. Imagine if second wave feminists were smarter, more creative, and less shallow. Imagine the complex economic networks that bored housewives could have made, the businesses they could have started, the education they could have provided for the next generation. Instead, they decided they wanted to wear pants and work along side men not their husbands. The elites and the banksters promoted second wave feminism because now there were two incomes to tax, two bank accounts, two cars to commute to the office, and double the pool of labor, thus lowering wages.

Third wave feminism was essentially a revolt against the lesbians who had taken over second wave feminism by the early 80s and the anti-sex prudes that hated men. Third wave feminism, starting about the 90s, was all about slut power. Women have the notion that men go around fucking their secretaries and living it up in a Playboy paradise. This is projection of their part, most men pretty much only have sex with their wives. The top “alpha” men that do get to womanize are a very limited group, but since women do not even register “beta” men as human beings, they suffer from the Apex Fallacy. Since Hugh Hefner has lots of women, “men” have lots of women, so it’s ok for women to slut it up just like the men do. But because of the nature of the sex differences, women tend to have more opportunity to sleep around then men, basic hypergamy explains this.

The other thing that third wave feminism did was to cry RAPE!!! if a lowly beta man tried to flirt with a woman, or if an “alpha” didn’t call the day after a hookup. Take Back the Night rallies where they spray painted “All Men Are Potential Rapists” all over campus. I’ll never forget a college girlfriend telling me about being raped, this guy she had been seeing came into her dorm room and held her down and forced her. She was crying as she told me this. I loved this woman, and was filled with rage at this man. I had a fantasy about hunting him down and killing him. I learned my lesson a few weeks later when she explained that after the rape, she still dated this guy for a while, had plenty of consensual sex with him before and after the “rape.” Sure, he raped her, but he was pretty hot in bed, so she forgave him and continued to sex him up until he moved on later. Third wave feminism has made it so the actual victims of “real rape” – “rape rape” – are lumped in with post-drunken hookup regrets. Real rape victims should be outraged, but evidently not.

Before It's Too Late
Before It’s Too Late

Women love opportunistically while men love idealistically. I think Rollo calls this the “war brides dynamic.” Alice Thomas Ellis famously said, “There is no reciprocity. Men love women. Women love children. Children love hamsters. Hamsters don’t love anyone.” Women have to adjust to the new men that killed their husbands and took them as war brides, so they are evolutionarily adapted to loving whichever strong man has the power, thus ensuring her own survival and, most importantly, the survival of her children. This dynamic likely explains rape/ravishment fantasies as well; if you’re going to get raped by the commander of the conquering tribe, you may as well enjoy it and hope he doesn’t kill your children like he killed your husband. Humanity is messy business, there’s no point in being angry at women for being the way they are, hell, you probably should blame men for being violent and starting all the wars in the first place.

Neither men nor women are monogamous by nature; monogamy was a compromise.

http://www.reddit.com/r/RedPillWomen/comments/1rpnx3/toward_a_reconciliation_of_male_and_female_nature/

So, what is the nature of humans in the state of nature according to The Red Pill?

1. Male ephebephiliac polygyny–A mouthful. Let’s unpack it. If Men existed in a universe where fully formed, hot 16-18 year old girls with long, silky hair and .7 hip-waist ratios grew out of the ground without agency, wants, needs and desires of their own and without families to care for and protect them, men would kill each other to collect as many of them as possible–replacing them with new ones as the older ones cycled out.

2. Female hypergamy–If 6’2″ 34 year old I-Banker millionaires grew out of the ground fully formed with no agency, wants, needs and desires of their own and no families to look after their interests–25 women would each chase and even consent to share the one that managed to make $1000001, while keeping a weather eye on any one who manages to make $1000002 as an option for jumping ship.

Thanks to modern, reliable birth control, women are able to slut it up as much as possible, and they tend to have more opportunities to do so then men do. The feminists always say that men are “insecure” about a woman’s sexual past, this is true. If your woman spent her college years sexing up Alpha McStudly the football quarterback with 14 inch biceps and a 5 inch thick cock, yeah, Regular Joe is right to feel insecure, that he will never measure up to her first “alpha.” She is likely fantasizing about Alpha McStudly fucking her brains out while her husband is rubbing her feet and tenderly giving her vanilla intercourse. Who wants to sign up for that?

Because men and women are different, even cheating has different ramifications for men and women. If a man cheat with his secretary, he doesn’t stop loving his wife. In fact, it’s a common trope, the mistress patiently waiting for her lover to leave his wife, but he never does. Women don’t cheat like that. By the time a woman cheats, she’s already checked out of the relationship, she is likely already out of love with her husband anyway.

So that’s why feminism is so damaging to monogamy and the family. If a woman really does make more than her husband, she will come to resent him, he will be emasculated in her eyes. If a woman spends all day long working for a man that makes more than her husband and has more power than her husband, that she willingly *submits* to on a daily basis, she’s going to come home and want to tell her husband about her day. What self-respecting man would want to hear the story of his wife spending all day submitting to another man that is more “alpha” than he is?

When men had more social power then women, every woman could fulfill her own hypergamy because her husband was her “alpha” – even if he was only alpha to her. Now, with men and women “equal” women increasingly compete for the very limited pool of “alphas.” Some guys are rolling in pussy now, but most men are not. Half of marriages are ending in divorce now, for just these reasons.

But here’s the deal – these career women did NOT create their own companies. They joined men’s companies. The feminists didn’t continue to invest in women’s colleges, they wanted to join the men’s colleges. They did not create their own female groups and organizations, they joined men’s instead. Why? Because they *can’t.* Groups of women cannot form the complex hierarchy that men can. That’s why once a group gets more than about 20% female, the men start to leave in droves. You can’t really compete with a woman, you lose either way. Lose to a woman, it’s de-masculinizing and humiliating. Win over a woman, well, what honor is it in beating a girl? At best you’re a bully, a mean nasty man hurting a woman’s feelings.

Don't Worry Sweetheart, It's Coming Back
Don’t Worry Sweetheart, It’s Coming Back

Women’s sexual strategy is “alpha fucks and beta bucks.” She wants the sperm of the top guy – the same guy that all the other women want – but she needs support and provisioning from the “beta” men. This is why women tend to vote for socialism – the beta men are de-individualized, just “society” providing and provisioning for women and children collectively. So women can actually sex up and bear the children of the “alphas” while still getting the “beta bucks” – but in this ideal feminism world, she never even has to sex up the lowly beta, or treat them as an individual human being, she just gets the check in the mail and the services of the nice betas.

How long will this state of affairs last? It’s already crashing down. Men aren’t marrying anymore, because they don’t get young virgin wives who are actual partners in creating a family and a home. They get a career woman, working for another man, bringing home a paycheck, competing with him and other men, just two labor units who like to bump uglies. When she births one or at best two children, they go into day care and the local government run public school while she’s working.

It’s almost like a “gay marriage” now, isn’t it? That’s “equality” for you.

At the end of the day, women simply don’t give a shit, about anyone or anything except themselves and their children. Women are deceptive by nature, ever since humans evolved past the chimpanzees whose ass turns bright red when she’s in heat. Right now, white women have it pretty damn good in America and Europe. No matter what choices she makes, there will always be the feminist media telling her it’s ok. Slut it up? That’s great and empowering. Divorce your husband? Great, he was probably abusive anyway, you go girl. Want a career? Great, they even have affirmative action so you will get promoted even if Beta Slob works harder than you.

But no matter what empowering and flattering lies the feminists tell you, you know deep down that you are not happy as independent wimminz that don’t need no man. Women are less happy then they were back in the bad old days of the 1950s. Your job pushing papers in the HR department will never give you the deep emotional satisfaction that seeing your grandchildren will. No matter how many guys you fuck on birth control, it won’t make you sexually empowered like you think men are.

Misogyny is the hatred of women. Nobody, but nobody, hates women like other women, feminists, and especially, themselves.

But don’t worry, sweethearts, the Man on the White Horse is on the way. The new sexism is just over the horizon; we’ve reached Peak Feminism. White men will win this battle, and you will be the spoils. We’re literally going to drag you by the hair back to our cave, put you back in your place, barefoot, pregnant, and in the kitchen. If you think that vacuuming your three bedroom suburban rancher and doing the dishes in your brand new, high tech dishwasher (you’re welcome) is hard work, just be warned that home schooling and neighborhood organizing are much harder.

But also much more rewarding.

Barefoot-pregnant-and-in-the-kitchen