Tag Archives: zionism

Leftism: Zionism, Jewish Supremacy, Neuroticism and Sheep-Shagging

Noam Chomsky’s Radical Zionism and Jewish Supremacism

One personal benefit to me of the death of the Alt Right is that after spending the last five or so years reading right-wing stuff I have some space in my head for more reading of left-wing stuff. The “left” per-se is basically dead; it’s all Trump Derangement Syndrome and the only alternative is the hard left or the far left.

In my college days I did what everyone did and read a lot of Noam Chomsky, until I figured out his gimmick. He’s completely right that the media is simply the PR department for corporate power; they are powerful corporations. Chomsky’s also right that US foreign policy is realpolitik based on economic interests and that US imperialism is as brutal as anything the Soviets or historical empires have done.

But Chomsky is a Jewish Supremacist, full stop, and a Zionist disinformationist. His goal, which shines through every single word he’s written or spoken, is to distract from Jewish power in the American Empire. It’s never powerful Jews doing things in the interests of Jews, it’s always “white” men. Chomsky, laughably, wants us to believe that the Israel lobby has no power and even if they did it’s not run by Jews, it’s really Evangelical Christians – as if working class, high school educated Bible-thumpers have any effect on US foreign policy. Chomsky goes into absolute hysterics whenever Jewish power is noticed.

You can see Jewish power by its distortion of US imperial policy, when the US does something that is not in its own interests but instead in the interest of the Zionist entity. You can also disern what Jews are scared about by noticing when Chomsky goes off script. When the Israel Lobby book came out, Chomsky went into hysterical damage control. He goes into full attack mode, complete with bald faced lies and smears when 9/11 is questioned.

An unusual book of his, the Camelot Myth, also makes sense in light of the context. He wrote this in anticipation of the release of a large number of files being declassified about the JFK assassination. Many leftists and liberals believe that JFK was assassinated because of his supposed opposition to the Vietnam war. Chomsky quickly wrote a book attacking this idea and painting JFK as a war hawk. And, of course, Chomsky was terrified that the Jewish and Zionist connections to the JFK assassination might have come out, so he had to put the left off of JFK, going so far as saying “who cares, people get shot all the time.”

What is good in Chomsky isn’t unique to him – the good work on the media was actually from someone else – and what is unique to Chomsky is simply Jewish and Zionist disinformation. He’ll be dead soon and when the left and the mainstream media start their hagiographies immediately upon his death, it will be a good time to demonstrate just what a liar and disinformation artist he is.

Taking Kaczynski’s Name In Vain

So I was researching Ted Kaczynski and came across this group Deep Green Resistance. I’m wondering why in the world this supposedly radical environmental group spends most of their time discussing feminism. Derrick Jensen is a nutcase, a fruit-loop, with utterly wrong ideas and willful blindness to reality, but I have to admit he has a soothing voice and an engaging speaking style.

I posit that a lot of left-wing activism is driven by child abuse. Jensen says his father raped and beat him and his entire family and it’s obvious that he is very much influenced by therapy culture.

So when he says that at the root of “the war against nature” is the “patriarchal need to dominate” it’s clear he’s based his worldview on his father’s abusive nature. When Paglia pointed out that virtually all of the celebrity feminists had sexually and physically abusive fathers, it puts the whole thing in context.

Jordan Peterson points out that these people have likely never experienced good masculinity, good male authority, good male expressions of power. They cannot distinguish between positive masulinity and negative masculinity and they are not mature enough people to think outside of their own experience. He also notices that women with personality disorders are highly overrepresented in feminism.

Kaczynski had these people nailed in Industrial Society and it’s awful that these people claim inspiration from him when he opposed everything they say.

The “need to dominate” is not at the root of environmental destruction. It’s not an emotional thing. It is literally short term rational self-interest leading to long term disaster. These people claim to be Marxist yet Marx totally opposed this kind of thinking; he was a materialist.

I guess at the end of the day the left is just not serious. They are either liars or emotional cripples.

The emotional cripples don’t get it: it is the lack of patriarchy that caused their abuse. A stronger patriarchy would discipline these abusive men. Family values of the kind Christianity teaches helps women and children and moderates male violence.

These people would get thrown out of the left if they were pro-white, which is too bad, because we really need a pro-white leftist perspective, if the term “left” even means anything anymore, and I’m not sure it does.

The real valuable concept that Marx gave was the concept of class struggle. Class was defined by your relationship to the means of production and property. This is still an incredibly useful concept and it drives a lot.

But the left gained power and dropped Marx and instead followed Trotsky. Trotsky was simply a Jew. He was a Jewish supremacist – literally – a hater of Slavic people which he openly derided as racially inferior. He was exactly like Hitler on this. Trotsky simply wanted to destroy European society and White people and to establish a Jewish dictatorship. He wanted to recruit the non-white world to destroy the white world – he was very clear on this.

Trotsky was, essentially, a Zionist, just not particularly concerned about real estate as far as we know.

And these white leftists – and face it, there are no non-white leftists – these white leftists have internalized Jewish hatred of “gentiles” and loudly advocate Trotsky’s strategy of recruiting non-whites to genocide white people. They are driven by hate.

The Feminization of the Left

There is a sterotype that Ashkenazis have of themselves, and there is data to support it, that they tend to be high on neuroticism.

Individuals who score high on neuroticism are more likely than average to be moody and to experience such feelings as anxiety, worry, fear, anger, frustration, envy, jealousy, guilt, depressed mood, and loneliness.

Women tend to be more neurotic than men, and feminist women tend to be more neurotic than non-feminist women.

So you see where this is going. The contemporary left threw out the masculine blue-collar White men that populated the labor movement. This happened because Ashkenazis had taken over the ruling class of the United States and no longer had common interests with blue-collar white men and their entire culture is based around a hatred of those very men. So, enter “cultural Marxism.” No longer would class – and class struggle – be defined by one’s relationship to property and the means of production. Now it was “social classes.”

Ashkenazis – one of the richest, most educated, and most elite ethnicities in America – were now on the other side of class struggle in the Marxist sense. They were no longer a proletariat fighting against capitalists, they were the new rulers. They had no interest at all in sharing power with the masculine, blue collar white “gentiles” that they hated; they had won.

As Peterson points out, feminists cannot distinguish between “good” masculinity and “bad” masculinity. So, all masculinity is suspect. At the root of this is their trauma from their abusive upbringing. They cannot distinguish negative male “need to dominate” with the “positive” male need to master – as in mastery, competence.

Hence, this frankly stupid notion that environmental destruction is caused by the “patriarchal need to dominate.” What we see is the feminization of the left due to the absence of masculine thinking styles. A real man – like Ted Kaczynski – looked at environmental destruction like an engineer; he understood the materialist causes. He understood these things systematically.

Women don’t have that thinking style. So the abused women – and men like Jensen who, despite being a materials engineer, likely due to his physical and sexual abuse at the hands of his father – abandond Kaczynski’s systematic, materialist understanding of the War Against Nature and came up with an emotional cause.

It’s because bad men need to “dominate” nature. Bad White men – but not Jews, because Hitler.

You see this absurdity with Jensen’s special pleading for homosexuality. He lists four sexual paraphilias: homosexuality, pedophilia, beastiality, and BDSM, and says homosexuality doesn’t belong on the list because it’s not based on the “need to dominate.”

Oh, really, Jensen? Considering the central place of pederasty in homosexuality, both contemporary and ancient, are you sure about that?

Also, beastiality: is this really based on the “need to dominate” an animal? I don’t think so. There are long standing jokes about “sheep-shagging.” It was more common than one might think in pastoral times. I was told by a woman farmer that, supposedly, it is believed that a sheep’s vagina feels the closest to a human woman’s. There is no need to dominate the sheep, it’s literally the desire to feel wet friction on your penis. There is a hilarious and/or disturbing viral video showing a Chinese family at the zoo freaking out because a monkey is putting its penis in the mouth of a frog. Did the monkey have a “need to dominate” the frog? Or was the monkey desiring wet friction on his penis?

Jensen rails against “the myth of human supremacism” but he still believes that humans aren’t animals, apparently.

Next time: what these leftists are missing is called psycopathy and its relation to narcissisism. Not all narcissists are psycopaths, but all psycopaths are narcissists.

Jensen and Deep Green Resistance are radical feminists, thus oppose Queer Theory. Well guess what social subgroup scores off-the-charts on narcissism?


That’s your connection to Queer Theory, Jensen. It’s not the patriarchal “need to dominate” behind this. It’s off the charts narcissism.

Guess what other groups tend to score high on narcissism?

Radical feminists are right that there is a difference between sex and gender. They are wrong that gender roles are entirely “socially constructed” but are, in fact, “socially reinforced.” The fact that some girls are tomboys does not negate the clustering, nor does the fact that some boys are “artistic.”

Jensen and the rest of the Deep Green Resistance should try actually reading Kaczynski.

And they should get over their childhood trauma, distance themselves from “gentile” hating Jews, and actually do the work to understand – and halt – the material conditions that are driving environmental destruction.

If that is, in fact, their goal. Which it probably isn’t. Their “activism” serves their emotional need to hate.

Heartiste Gets Banned For Criticizing Advertisers

(((Weev))) was arrested for messing with Apple’s product launch. Breitbart.com survived despite General Mills dropping their ads. Tucker Carlson had his advertisers attacked and lost at least a few.

Glenn Beck had his show cancelled because he started questioning neo-con wars. But although he was the number one show, extremely popular with old people, senior citizens, the show didn’t make much money because they couldn’t get ads.

All these “free” sites are not “free” – they are paid for by the advertisers. Google isn’t a “search” company – it’s an advertising broker.

Henry Ford explained all this way back in the era of newspaper ads for supermarkets. There are certain, er, (((interests))) that are highly organized and will pressure companies to boycott their perceived enemies.

So what did Heartiste do? He criticized a major advertiser, one that WordPress relies on to stay in business:


NRx Zionist Jew Pedophile Advocate Attempts To Defame Hipster Racist

A few months ago I saw some traffic coming to my blog and found it linked by an article titled “I Am A Jailbait” on a blog called “Triweekly Antifeminist” written by an author calling itself “Tom Grauer.” He promotes an idea he calls “Male Sexualism.”

I’m sure you can figure out the basic idea from this quote from his article:

it is perfectly natural, healthy, and normal for all men to sexually desire 15-year-olds. Once you admit to the truth, there is no going back away from the truth. You took the bait – and, the internet being what it is, you are busted forever. Score a victory for Male Sexualism. Every man who admits to it being natural to sexually desire teenagers is a victory for our side.

He then quotes a paragraph from my “Baltimore Stories,” a fictional series about a teenage boy living in Baltimore:

Now, Amanda had gone to high school with us. My first memory of Amanda is helping her break into her father’s house. Of course, her father was obviously rich as shit, judging by the house. I mean, I asked her what was up. She said she hated her father. I said why? She didn’t want to talk about it, and Amy – you know, the little Blondie slip of a thing I had been fucking since she was 15 – just gave me a look that basically said “don’t ask.” Amanda said, “the things he did to me, he owes me. I’d take every fucking cent he had just to get away from him.”

Apparently, this paragraph got Tom Grauer all excited and he decided that now I was a part of his “Male Sexualism” movement, whether I liked it or not. You can simply read the language hinting at some sort of threat:

Once you tell the truth, can’t deny it anymore. It is documented. It is archived for eternity, at least somewhere. No joke, everything ever written is documented. “Hipster Racist,” a blogger, once wrote the following on one of his blogs … What’s that, Hipster? Granted, his story may be fictional. Who knows. But, be it truthful or fanciful, it is revealing. You are one of us, Hipster. … Nor can you effectively shut yourself down. “Delete everything” is just not a viable option in this day and age. Once written, can’t be un-written.

But Tom Grauer deleted that blog and started a new one, called “Male Sexualism Blog: Exploring an Alternative to Modern Sex-Crime Legislation” at tomantifeminist.home.blog. He essentially rewrote his article “I Am A Jailbait” as ““Muh 16” May be The Puritan-Feminist Party Line, But The Party Itself is Losing Popularity” and, apparently to get my attention, posted this comment on my blog as “Surreal.”

Oy vey goyim, muh age of consent, support Palestine.

In the vernacular of the “Alt Right” – and especially the (((Hollywood Nazi))) faction, this sentence means, “Hey stupid goy, the JOOOOOZ you are so paranoid about want you to support an age of consent law and to support Palestine.

“Muh 16” May be The Puritan-Feminist Party Line, But The Party Itself is Losing Popularity

I found it funny – and revealing – that he just couldn’t help himself and freaked out because I sometimes write about the Palestinian cause and the apartheid regime of Jew bigotry in Zionist-occupied Palestine. This makes me a target of Zionist Jews because I support the human rights of Palestinian people. To a Zionist Jew, this is “anti-semitic” and so this Jew has decided to throw around back-handed threats to me, suggest I’m some sort of pervert that wants to lower the age of consent and have sex with 15 year old girls – and points out, on multiple occasions, that even if I were to delete this story, it wouldn’t matter because the internet is forever, etc.

Of course, I’m not the one deleting my blogs and posts – that’s him. Nor am I advocating lowering the age of consent nor creating an ideology called “Male Sexualism” all about normalizing adult men having sex with teenage girls. That would be him, Tom Grauer, who does those things and in fact cites Jewish rabbis to back him up in his four part series, “Obadiah Shoher’s Relevance to Male Sexualism.”

Obadiah Shoher’s Relevance to Male Sexualism, 1/4

Interestingly, like most “neo-reactionary” followers of (((Curtin Yarvin’s))) “NRx” ideology, to Tom Grauer all problems are caused by … “Puritans” (i.e., White Anglo-Saxon Protestants) … and it is these “Puritans” and the modern “Feminist” partners that are oppressing men by making it illegal for men to have sex with girls under the age of sixteen, and, I suspect, to “consume” pornography featuring girls under the age of 18.

He’s not the only NRx blogger who talks about “ten year old girls” being sexually interested in adult men either – so does “Jim” of Blog.Jim.com – another (((Curtin Yarvin))) NRx fan who is also a Zionist and hates “anti-seeeeemites” and Palestinians who also blames “Puritans” for all the problems of the world.

(Full disclosure: I am the decendant of Puritans.)

I would have of course ignored Tom Grauer, in fact never even had heard of him, if he didn’t try to rope me into his bizarre “ideology” by purposefully trying to defame me by mischaracterizing a paragraph from a fictional story.

But when you mention the human rights of Palestinians, it’s really only a matter of time until a Zionist Jew like Tom Grauer comes after you, trying to defame your character, paint you as an “extremist” and an “anti-seeeeeeeemite” and even go so far as to start an ostensibly pro-pedophilia blog to try to defame people by association – or in this case, non-association.

A quick glance at his blog made me think at first he is simply a pornsick man desperately trying to justify his “legal teen porn” addiction – and that may be a part of it.

But when you have a Zionist Jew like Tom Grauer attacking Palestinians and those who support their human rights by trying to defame them as pedophiles, it’s pretty obviously one of those “Canary Mission” employees – professional Zionist hasbara engaged in a smear campaign against anyone noticing Zionist Jew genocide against Palestinians – and “Puritans” – “Puritan” being a code word for “WASP” and, more generally, “White American.”

Anyone familiar with my blogging career knows that I’ve never advocated for the lowering of the age of consent (as far as I can remember I’ve never even written about the age of consent) nor have I ever suggested that men were oppressed by “AOC laws” nor that it’s acceptable for adult men to have sex with 15 or 16 year old girls. Nor have I ever done what NRx Jim and Tom Grauer do and claim that ten year old girls want to have sex with adult men.

That sounds like a pedophile projecting, does it not?

Best advice: stay away from these NRx freaks, advocates for pedophilia, and Jews who are into “neo-reaction.”

Sincerely, “Hipster Puritan.”

“Mother’s Baby, Daddy’s Maybe”

The Atlantic was once a respectable White Anglo-Saxon Protestant magazine for the New England liberal elites.

Since it was bought by the Jew Jeffrey Goldberg it has devolved into a laughable tabloid trying to sell hardcore Zionist Jew apartheid and Palestinian genocide – and White Genocide – to the remnants of the White upper middle classes. Goldberg actually hired George W. Bush’s old speechwriter David Frum, who coined the term “Axis of Evil” to get Americans to destroy Israel’s enemies, Iraq and Iran. Why? Because Judaism is a racist hate cult that wants to murder Arabs particularly and Muslims in general.

Taking advice from a racist hate cult that wants your people genocided is generally a bad idea.

So of course now The Atlantic is no longer a magazine for intellectual White liberals, but is reduced to Salon.com style Social Justice Warriorism. A recent article asks: Why Don’t More Men Take Their Wives’ Last Names?

You can read it if you want, here:


But of course the answer is simple. Patriarchy is the bedrock of civilization, and the way you connect fathers to sons – and thereby get men to invest in children and grandchildren – is by offering them immortality through a family name. A legacy.

As my former co-blogger Cly once pointed out, it used to be common for the American (and I suppose European) middle classes to name their small family businesses “Smith and Sons.”

Why this emphasis on the male lineage? Because everyone already knows the matriarchal lineage. “Mother’s Baby, Daddy’s Maybe.” You have to convince the father the children are actually his and women have created an entire culture around doing just that.

Not only do grandmothers assure their sons in law that “your baby has your eyes” – they now even claim that the sonograms look “just like” the supposed father!

He looks just like you! A spitting image of daddy. He even has your eyes! Trust me!

As soon as patriarchy – including young women being married as virgins – went out of style – so did marriage. Otherwise, what is the point? Of all the problems caused by the destruction of traditional marriage, for me the most annoying are all the articles in blogs by post-wall women complaining “where have all the good men gone?” “How come after spending my 20s engaging in promiscuity that would make a Parisian whore blush I can’t find a wealthy, handsome man to pretend I’m a nervous 17 year old virgin bride and pledge the rest of his life to me in return for a single child that is probably his?”

If I were a petty man, I’d guffaw at all the middle aged single women I’ve seen go ballistic when a successful 30 year old man ignores all the single over-credentialed 30 year old women to take up with young, fertile 20-somethinig baristas. Hell, I know of this because I’ve done it myself – and seen the reaction.

But the costs to my people and my society is just too damn high – below replacement fertility, bitter spinsters and “single” mothers, and an epidemic of divorce.

If any older White women actually cared about our people, they would be the FIRST telling those young, fertile, attractive women – “he’s a good catch – marry him now and start making babies! You’ll be happier in the long term.”

Listening to some nutty feminist being published by a bunch of racist, White-and-Palestinian-genociding Zionist Jews telling us that instead men should take their wive’s name in some sort of bizarre cross-dressing fetish that appeals to no one is pretty much the worst thing that anyone could do.

What next? Gender-bending for kids?

You want to take MY last name? What are you gay?

Occidental Observer Exposes Zionist Fraud Noam Chomsky

I’ve written about this guy many times. It’s amazing how many people fail to put two and two together. I will note four interesting things about Chomsky:

1. When the JFK papers started to be released – something “the left” and “liberals” were very interested in – Chomsky wrote a hit piece against the Kennedy administration titled “Rethinking Camelot.”

AryanSkynet has been particularly thorough in pointing out the Israeli connections to the JFK (and RFK) assassinations.

2. Chomsky famously attacked 9/11 Truth in the most blatantly dishonest and underhanded ways. Even some of his own lefty cultists were left scratching their heads.

3. When Mearsheimer and Walt wrote their groundbreaking work, “The Israel Lobby” – Chomsky immediately went on the attack – even before he read the book, as he himself admitted.

4. Chomsky has actually played defense for the Federal Reserve. Imagine that – a supposedly “anti-capitalist” and “anti-fascist” that actually supports the ultimate merger of state and corporate power – not to mention the core institution of the “Wall Street 1%” that the Occupy people complain about.

Chomsky is a great example of the “Jewish guru effect” that Dr. Kevin MacDonald has discussed. His followers revere him as some sort of Old Testament prophet, and any criticism is met with hysteria.

Full disclosure: I’ve not only attended a Chomsky lecture in person, I’ve read at least half of his books and articles.


Kinky Sex Fetish: A Manhattan Murder Mystery 13

Before Tinder, it was Craigslist.

Look – young people from all over the country move to New York to work at prestigious companies for a lot of money. Everyone is working all the time. The gals are not interested in settling down and having babies. The men are focused, lazer like, on making money.

So what do you think horny young 20 somethings do?

They “hook up.”

And back in 2001, it was Craigslist. Craigslist was still virtually unknown outside of a few cities like New York, Chicago, and San Francisco. The only people that used Craigslist were 20 something hipsters from the city. So back then, women would still put up personal ads and sometimes even post a picture. It wasn’t “private” exactly but the audience was small and exclusive.

Her ad said “No Time To Date” and it was a litany of “small town gal in the big city.” Works all the time, never gets to meet guys. Looking for this and that, something. Loves this. Whatever.

Reading between the lines it means “busy career gal, haven’t been laid in months, looking for a man to fuck me silly all weekend then leave me alone.”

For me, this was my bread and butter pretty much, because, hey, I was in the same situation. I did have a girlfriend, but she lived all the way across the country in California and it’s not cheating if you’re in a different state.

Whatever, I never claimed to be a “good person.”

So this was like textbook. We had met for drinks on Wednesday at the dive bar near the towers. Aisha would flirt with me when I had some girl there, to help me out. She was a sweetheart. Aisha wasn’t interested in me at all but she liked me hanging around so she’d help out when she could. So this girl – I don’t remember her name – she’s about 27, a few years older than me. Cute, slender, long hair, dressed real nice. I forgot what she did. We have three drinks, I tell her I’ll walk her to the subway around the corner. She turns to say goodbye so I kiss her, we make plans to meet on Monday, after she gets back from whatever she’s doing on the weekend.

On Monday, god, I could barely concentrate at work. I had half a hard on all day thinking about fucking this girl tonight. At lunch, my bosses, Jimmy and Richie, took me and a few of the guys out to some fancy Thai place at the World Financial Center a few blocks away. Jimmy is bitching and bitching about the power downs. It didn’t make any damn sense. Why would both buildings have all of their power – including emergency power – shut off over the weekend? Everyone had been working late backing up all of the systems, making sure we could bring them back up without any problems. This did not make Jimmy happy at all.

Jimmy was probably 40 something, blonde hair, blue eyes, looked like a grown up boy scout but cursed like a sailor. He actually came across as rather relaxed and informal but the man was responsible for billions of dollars flowing through the company on a daily basis, yet he never broke a sweat. And the power down thing did not please him at all. He had been working on some roll out for months then, all a sudden, without any warning, the building management told everyone they had to prepare for two weekends of power downs, in both towers. “Upgrading the internet” or “fixing the electricity” or something, and that was why Jimmy was bitching about it so much.

Anyway he was a cool guy and it was nice of him to take us peons out for lunch with the big bosses. You know, older guys, they love to show off to the younger men. As I was like 24, just out of college working my first job, I never paid for lunch, or drinks after work. Guys like Jimmy and Richie, they loved to pull out hundred dollar bills and give outrageous tips to the bartenders and waitresses. I suspect both of them were loaded far beyond the kind of money I could imagine.

Of course, for me, 24 year old kid from the suburbs, I was making fucking bank. I’d pull out twenty dollar bills to tip the girls at the bar but it came from the same place honestly.

So we’re all chomping away on $40 entrees while Jimmy and Richie are having a cussing contest talking about the power downs. I’m pretending to pay attention but all I can think about is this chick I’m meeting later that night.


You know, thinking back on it, I figured it was just a regular job. I had pulled my one string to get this job, some kid I knew in college worked for one of the banks and knew Richie and had gotten me an interview. I wasn’t an employee, I was a consultant, working on a small team with a contract. Now I figured, sure, some of these guys had probably worked at NSA and the like, and I knew some of the guys from the DC office worked down in Maryland and had security clearances, but how was I to know, some kid, how connected finance is to the spook industry?

So I’m guessing, and it’s just a guess, that one of the guys on our team was assigned to this company for reasons a bit more complex than just a salary. LOL, I was surrounded by these people but I didn’t have a fucking clue.

But whatever – all I can think about is meeting Hot Chick uptown later than night, around nine. Meeting for drinks at nine basically means you’ve already scored, as long as you don’t fuck it up.

So that’s why I was uptown. We meet over at a bar close to her place, lubricate ourselves with a shot of whiskey each and two glasses of wine, then hop in a cab back to her place. I was basically raping her in the back of the cab. The driver says, “no please don’t touch her. Not here, no please.”

I swear, if I was the conspiracy theory type, I’d say the cab driver was Osama Bin Laden himself. Full bushy beard, some kind of tablecloth on his head, the whole nine yards. Of course Osama Bin Laden was on the news every once in a while but you know, we had no idea of what was coming.

So all night long I’m fucking this girl. We just walk into her apartment, she starts to get a bottle of wine by I’m just kissing all over her and just drag her into the bedroom. Two horny strangers just needing some attention and to get off. Well she wakes me up around seven and I’m hustling to get to work. No time to go back to my place but I have a change of clothes at the office for just this sort of thing. So I shower and put on last night’s clothes, which smell like smoke and whiskey. Frankly I look like shit, unshaven, but hell it was worth it.

So I walk blocks to the subway and get onto the train. This train is always fucking crowded. Miraculously, I get a seat and start reading my Wall Street Journal (best newspaper in America, at least back in those days.) Hey, I work in finance so it’s what you’re supposed to read.

I’m almost at my stop, but then, the train stops and all the lights go out. “Shit,” I’m thinking, “I’m going to be late. Jimmy is going to chew my ass out.” We sit there for five minutes – it seems like forever. The light comes on for like two seconds, then go back off. You could hear everyone on the train groaning, cursing under their breath and sighing. The announcer comes on and says, “there’s a delay.” Well, no shit, I thought. Five more minutes.

Finally, the train starts moving, but it’s going backwards. Now people are whining real loud, but it keeps going backwards. We go all the way back to the previous stop, and the announcer says, “there’s been an accident at the World Trade Center. Everyone must exit the train here. Everyone must exit.” People are mumbling, but the lights come on at the station, the doors open, and we all get off the train. The announcer says everyone must exit the station too. This sucks, but we all line up and start walking up the stairs.

I look at my watch, it’s already nine o’clock. I’m thinking, “shit I’m going to be so late.” Well I finally make it up the stairs to ground level and there’s a huge crowd standing in front of one of the buildings. Everyone is pointing and staring, some people even have video cameras out. I’m thinking what the hell is going on? So I look over to where everyone is looking and – let me tell you – I couldn’t fucking believe what I saw.


I can’t stand it I know you planned it
I’m gonna set it straight, this watergate
I can’t stand rocking when I’m in here
Because your crystal ball ain’t so crystal clear
So while you sit back and wonder why
I got this fucking thorn in my side
Oh my God, it’s a mirage
I’m tellin’ y’all it’s sabotage

Taylor Swift’s New Hipster Racist Video Earns Her A Good Hard Spanking

Taylor Swift has been a very, very naughty girl, what with her new hipster racist video for “Wildest Dreams.”

It’s not that I want to turn her over my knee and give her a good hard spanking but someone has to do it so I’ll take one for the team and volunteer.

Everytime I go to youtube Taylor Swift dominates the front page. Face it, she’s just about genetic perfection. I would impregnate her all night long and some the next morning too. That gal could birth some beautiful White babies. She can have my 14 babies and 88 grandbabies any day (h/t Rudeforthought and Ghost of Virtve Past @ TheRightStuff.biz.)

She’s about as classy as a pop singer can be and she’s only dated hot White hunks – no Miley Virus is she. She started out singing country – The White Music – and now she holds up the Implicitly White end of the pop spectrum. I wouldn’t mind my 12 year old daughter – or my 28 year old trophy wife – being a fan of Taylor Swift.

Apparently, she’s pissed off the Usual Suspects for her new video suggesting the total Racial Cleansing of Africa – that’s our gal! (h/t CantSpellAshkenaziWithoutNAZI @ TheRightStuff.biz.)

“Taylor Swift’s new Wildest Dreams video is criticized for being ‘racist’ and based on a ‘glamorous white colonial fantasy’ of Africa”


Of course, the video is directed by Joseph Kahn (*cough*) but no one is going to mention that … but he says it’s ok, he didn’t murder any Palestinian babies while filming the video and he included a couple of Token Negroes in a few shots.


I nominate Taylor Swift as the new Official Hipster Racist Goddess.

Sieg Swift! Heil Taylor!

Sieg Heil
Sieg Heil

All of Taylor’s proceeds from this video will be donated to wild animal conservation efforts through the African Parks Foundation of America.